Cargando…
The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity
A progressive decline in upper limb function is associated with ageing and disease. In this cross-sectional study we assessed the performance of 367 healthy individuals aged of 20 to 95 years across a battery of upper limb clinical tests, which we have termed the upper limb Physiological Profile Ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31247034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218553 |
_version_ | 1783430542329380864 |
---|---|
author | Ingram, Lewis A. Butler, Annie A. Walsh, Lee D. Brodie, Matthew A. Lord, Stephen R. Gandevia, Simon C. |
author_facet | Ingram, Lewis A. Butler, Annie A. Walsh, Lee D. Brodie, Matthew A. Lord, Stephen R. Gandevia, Simon C. |
author_sort | Ingram, Lewis A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A progressive decline in upper limb function is associated with ageing and disease. In this cross-sectional study we assessed the performance of 367 healthy individuals aged of 20 to 95 years across a battery of upper limb clinical tests, which we have termed the upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). The upper limb PPA was designed to quantify the performance of the multiple physiological domains important for adequate function in the upper extremities. Included are tests of muscle strength, unilateral movement and dexterity, position sense, skin sensation, bimanual coordination, arm stability, along with a functional task. We report age and gender normative values for each test. Test-retest reliability ranged from good to excellent in all tests (intra-class correlation coefficients from 0.65 to 0.98) with the exception of position sense (0.31). Ten of the thirteen tests revealed differences in performance between males and females, twelve showed a decline in performance with increasing age, and eight discriminated between older people with and without upper limb functional impairment. Furthermore, most tests showed good external validity with respect to age, an upper limb functional test and self-reported function. This profiling approach provides a reference range for clinical groups with upper limb sensory and motor impairments and may assist in identifying undiagnosed deficits in the general population. Furthermore, the tests are sufficiently reliable to detect motor impairments in people with compromised upper limb function and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6597070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65970702019-07-05 The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity Ingram, Lewis A. Butler, Annie A. Walsh, Lee D. Brodie, Matthew A. Lord, Stephen R. Gandevia, Simon C. PLoS One Research Article A progressive decline in upper limb function is associated with ageing and disease. In this cross-sectional study we assessed the performance of 367 healthy individuals aged of 20 to 95 years across a battery of upper limb clinical tests, which we have termed the upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). The upper limb PPA was designed to quantify the performance of the multiple physiological domains important for adequate function in the upper extremities. Included are tests of muscle strength, unilateral movement and dexterity, position sense, skin sensation, bimanual coordination, arm stability, along with a functional task. We report age and gender normative values for each test. Test-retest reliability ranged from good to excellent in all tests (intra-class correlation coefficients from 0.65 to 0.98) with the exception of position sense (0.31). Ten of the thirteen tests revealed differences in performance between males and females, twelve showed a decline in performance with increasing age, and eight discriminated between older people with and without upper limb functional impairment. Furthermore, most tests showed good external validity with respect to age, an upper limb functional test and self-reported function. This profiling approach provides a reference range for clinical groups with upper limb sensory and motor impairments and may assist in identifying undiagnosed deficits in the general population. Furthermore, the tests are sufficiently reliable to detect motor impairments in people with compromised upper limb function and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Public Library of Science 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6597070/ /pubmed/31247034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218553 Text en © 2019 Ingram et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ingram, Lewis A. Butler, Annie A. Walsh, Lee D. Brodie, Matthew A. Lord, Stephen R. Gandevia, Simon C. The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity |
title | The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity |
title_full | The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity |
title_fullStr | The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity |
title_full_unstemmed | The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity |
title_short | The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity |
title_sort | upper limb physiological profile assessment: description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31247034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218553 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ingramlewisa theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT butleranniea theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT walshleed theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT brodiematthewa theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT lordstephenr theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT gandeviasimonc theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT ingramlewisa upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT butleranniea upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT walshleed upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT brodiematthewa upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT lordstephenr upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity AT gandeviasimonc upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity |