Cargando…

The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity

A progressive decline in upper limb function is associated with ageing and disease. In this cross-sectional study we assessed the performance of 367 healthy individuals aged of 20 to 95 years across a battery of upper limb clinical tests, which we have termed the upper limb Physiological Profile Ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingram, Lewis A., Butler, Annie A., Walsh, Lee D., Brodie, Matthew A., Lord, Stephen R., Gandevia, Simon C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31247034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218553
_version_ 1783430542329380864
author Ingram, Lewis A.
Butler, Annie A.
Walsh, Lee D.
Brodie, Matthew A.
Lord, Stephen R.
Gandevia, Simon C.
author_facet Ingram, Lewis A.
Butler, Annie A.
Walsh, Lee D.
Brodie, Matthew A.
Lord, Stephen R.
Gandevia, Simon C.
author_sort Ingram, Lewis A.
collection PubMed
description A progressive decline in upper limb function is associated with ageing and disease. In this cross-sectional study we assessed the performance of 367 healthy individuals aged of 20 to 95 years across a battery of upper limb clinical tests, which we have termed the upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). The upper limb PPA was designed to quantify the performance of the multiple physiological domains important for adequate function in the upper extremities. Included are tests of muscle strength, unilateral movement and dexterity, position sense, skin sensation, bimanual coordination, arm stability, along with a functional task. We report age and gender normative values for each test. Test-retest reliability ranged from good to excellent in all tests (intra-class correlation coefficients from 0.65 to 0.98) with the exception of position sense (0.31). Ten of the thirteen tests revealed differences in performance between males and females, twelve showed a decline in performance with increasing age, and eight discriminated between older people with and without upper limb functional impairment. Furthermore, most tests showed good external validity with respect to age, an upper limb functional test and self-reported function. This profiling approach provides a reference range for clinical groups with upper limb sensory and motor impairments and may assist in identifying undiagnosed deficits in the general population. Furthermore, the tests are sufficiently reliable to detect motor impairments in people with compromised upper limb function and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6597070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65970702019-07-05 The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity Ingram, Lewis A. Butler, Annie A. Walsh, Lee D. Brodie, Matthew A. Lord, Stephen R. Gandevia, Simon C. PLoS One Research Article A progressive decline in upper limb function is associated with ageing and disease. In this cross-sectional study we assessed the performance of 367 healthy individuals aged of 20 to 95 years across a battery of upper limb clinical tests, which we have termed the upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). The upper limb PPA was designed to quantify the performance of the multiple physiological domains important for adequate function in the upper extremities. Included are tests of muscle strength, unilateral movement and dexterity, position sense, skin sensation, bimanual coordination, arm stability, along with a functional task. We report age and gender normative values for each test. Test-retest reliability ranged from good to excellent in all tests (intra-class correlation coefficients from 0.65 to 0.98) with the exception of position sense (0.31). Ten of the thirteen tests revealed differences in performance between males and females, twelve showed a decline in performance with increasing age, and eight discriminated between older people with and without upper limb functional impairment. Furthermore, most tests showed good external validity with respect to age, an upper limb functional test and self-reported function. This profiling approach provides a reference range for clinical groups with upper limb sensory and motor impairments and may assist in identifying undiagnosed deficits in the general population. Furthermore, the tests are sufficiently reliable to detect motor impairments in people with compromised upper limb function and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Public Library of Science 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6597070/ /pubmed/31247034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218553 Text en © 2019 Ingram et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ingram, Lewis A.
Butler, Annie A.
Walsh, Lee D.
Brodie, Matthew A.
Lord, Stephen R.
Gandevia, Simon C.
The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity
title The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity
title_full The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity
title_fullStr The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity
title_full_unstemmed The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity
title_short The upper limb Physiological Profile Assessment: Description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity
title_sort upper limb physiological profile assessment: description, reliability, normative values and criterion validity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31247034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218553
work_keys_str_mv AT ingramlewisa theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT butleranniea theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT walshleed theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT brodiematthewa theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT lordstephenr theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT gandeviasimonc theupperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT ingramlewisa upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT butleranniea upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT walshleed upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT brodiematthewa upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT lordstephenr upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity
AT gandeviasimonc upperlimbphysiologicalprofileassessmentdescriptionreliabilitynormativevaluesandcriterionvalidity