Cargando…

Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the assessment of skeletal muscle perfusion in diabetes mellites. MATERIAL/METHODS: Electronic databases (Embase, Google Scholar, Ovid, and PubMed) were searched for required articles, and studies were select...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Lin-lin, Zhai, Jun-xiu, Kang, Jie, Li, You-shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31211767
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.915252
_version_ 1783430559587893248
author Chen, Lin-lin
Zhai, Jun-xiu
Kang, Jie
Li, You-shan
author_facet Chen, Lin-lin
Zhai, Jun-xiu
Kang, Jie
Li, You-shan
author_sort Chen, Lin-lin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the assessment of skeletal muscle perfusion in diabetes mellites. MATERIAL/METHODS: Electronic databases (Embase, Google Scholar, Ovid, and PubMed) were searched for required articles, and studies were selected by following pre-determined eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses of mean differences or standardized mean differences (SMD) were performed to evaluate the significance of difference in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography measured muscle perfusion indices between patients with diabetes and healthy individuals or between basal and final values of perfusion indices after insulin manipulation or physical exercise in patients with diabetes or healthy individuals. RESULTS: There were 15 studies included, with 279 patients with diabetes and 230 healthy individuals in total. The age of the study patients with diabetes mellitus was 55.8 years (95% CI: 49.6 years, 61.9 years) and these patients had disease for 11.4 years (95% CI: 7.7 years, 15.1 years). The percentage of males in group of patients with diabetes was 66% (95% CI: 49%, 84%), body mass index was 29.4 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 26.5 kg/m(2), 32.3 kg/m(2)), hemoglobin A1c was 7.3% (95% CI: 6.7%, 7.9%), and fasting plasma glucose was 149 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 118 kg/m(2), 179 kg/m(2)). Time to peak intensity after provocation was significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in healthy individuals (SMD 1.18 [95% CI: 0.60, 1.76]; P<0.00001). In patients with diabetes, insulin administration did not improve contrast-enhanced ultrasonography measured muscle perfusion indices but exercise improved muscle perfusion but at a level that was statistically non-significant (SMD between basal and post-exercise values (1.03 [95% CI: −0.14, 2.20]; P=0.08). In healthy individuals, lipids in addition to insulin administration was associated with significantly reduced blood volume and blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Our review showed that the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed that diabetes mellitus was associated with altered muscle perfusion in which insulin-mediated metabolic changes played an important role.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6597144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65971442019-07-16 Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis Chen, Lin-lin Zhai, Jun-xiu Kang, Jie Li, You-shan Med Sci Monit Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the assessment of skeletal muscle perfusion in diabetes mellites. MATERIAL/METHODS: Electronic databases (Embase, Google Scholar, Ovid, and PubMed) were searched for required articles, and studies were selected by following pre-determined eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses of mean differences or standardized mean differences (SMD) were performed to evaluate the significance of difference in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography measured muscle perfusion indices between patients with diabetes and healthy individuals or between basal and final values of perfusion indices after insulin manipulation or physical exercise in patients with diabetes or healthy individuals. RESULTS: There were 15 studies included, with 279 patients with diabetes and 230 healthy individuals in total. The age of the study patients with diabetes mellitus was 55.8 years (95% CI: 49.6 years, 61.9 years) and these patients had disease for 11.4 years (95% CI: 7.7 years, 15.1 years). The percentage of males in group of patients with diabetes was 66% (95% CI: 49%, 84%), body mass index was 29.4 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 26.5 kg/m(2), 32.3 kg/m(2)), hemoglobin A1c was 7.3% (95% CI: 6.7%, 7.9%), and fasting plasma glucose was 149 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 118 kg/m(2), 179 kg/m(2)). Time to peak intensity after provocation was significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in healthy individuals (SMD 1.18 [95% CI: 0.60, 1.76]; P<0.00001). In patients with diabetes, insulin administration did not improve contrast-enhanced ultrasonography measured muscle perfusion indices but exercise improved muscle perfusion but at a level that was statistically non-significant (SMD between basal and post-exercise values (1.03 [95% CI: −0.14, 2.20]; P=0.08). In healthy individuals, lipids in addition to insulin administration was associated with significantly reduced blood volume and blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Our review showed that the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed that diabetes mellitus was associated with altered muscle perfusion in which insulin-mediated metabolic changes played an important role. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6597144/ /pubmed/31211767 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.915252 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2019 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Chen, Lin-lin
Zhai, Jun-xiu
Kang, Jie
Li, You-shan
Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
title Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of skeletal muscle perfusion in diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31211767
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.915252
work_keys_str_mv AT chenlinlin utilityofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfortheassessmentofskeletalmuscleperfusionindiabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT zhaijunxiu utilityofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfortheassessmentofskeletalmuscleperfusionindiabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT kangjie utilityofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfortheassessmentofskeletalmuscleperfusionindiabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT liyoushan utilityofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfortheassessmentofskeletalmuscleperfusionindiabetesmellitusametaanalysis