Cargando…

Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy

BACKGROUND: System science approaches are increasingly used to explore complex public health problems. Quantitative methods, such as participatory dynamic simulation modelling, can mobilise knowledge to inform health policy decisions. However, the analytic and practical steps required to turn collab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freebairn, Louise, Atkinson, Jo-An, Osgood, Nathaniel D., Kelly, Paul M., McDonnell, Geoff, Rychetnik, Lucie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31247006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218875
_version_ 1783430566159319040
author Freebairn, Louise
Atkinson, Jo-An
Osgood, Nathaniel D.
Kelly, Paul M.
McDonnell, Geoff
Rychetnik, Lucie
author_facet Freebairn, Louise
Atkinson, Jo-An
Osgood, Nathaniel D.
Kelly, Paul M.
McDonnell, Geoff
Rychetnik, Lucie
author_sort Freebairn, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: System science approaches are increasingly used to explore complex public health problems. Quantitative methods, such as participatory dynamic simulation modelling, can mobilise knowledge to inform health policy decisions. However, the analytic and practical steps required to turn collaboratively developed, qualitative system maps into rigorous and policy-relevant quantified dynamic simulation models are not well described. This paper reports on the processes, interactions and decisions that occurred at the interface between modellers and end-user participants in an applied health sector case study focusing on diabetes in pregnancy. METHODS: An analysis was conducted using qualitative data from a participatory dynamic simulation modelling case study in an Australian health policy setting. Recordings of participatory model development workshops and subsequent meetings were analysed and triangulated with field notes and other written records of discussions and decisions. Case study vignettes were collated to illustrate the deliberations and decisions made throughout the model development process. RESULTS: The key analytic objectives and decision-making processes included: defining the model scope; analysing and refining the model structure to maximise local relevance and utility; reviewing and incorporating evidence to inform model parameters and assumptions; focusing the model on priority policy questions; communicating results and applying the models to policy processes. These stages did not occur sequentially; the model development was cyclical and iterative with decisions being re-visited and refined throughout the process. Storytelling was an effective strategy to both communicate and resolve concerns about the model logic and structure, and to communicate the outputs of the model to a broader audience. CONCLUSION: The in-depth analysis reported here examined the application of participatory modelling methods to move beyond qualitative conceptual mapping to the development of a rigorously quantified and policy relevant, complex dynamic simulation model. The analytic objectives and decision-making themes identified provide guidance for interpreting, understanding and reporting future participatory modelling projects and methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6597234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65972342019-07-05 Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy Freebairn, Louise Atkinson, Jo-An Osgood, Nathaniel D. Kelly, Paul M. McDonnell, Geoff Rychetnik, Lucie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: System science approaches are increasingly used to explore complex public health problems. Quantitative methods, such as participatory dynamic simulation modelling, can mobilise knowledge to inform health policy decisions. However, the analytic and practical steps required to turn collaboratively developed, qualitative system maps into rigorous and policy-relevant quantified dynamic simulation models are not well described. This paper reports on the processes, interactions and decisions that occurred at the interface between modellers and end-user participants in an applied health sector case study focusing on diabetes in pregnancy. METHODS: An analysis was conducted using qualitative data from a participatory dynamic simulation modelling case study in an Australian health policy setting. Recordings of participatory model development workshops and subsequent meetings were analysed and triangulated with field notes and other written records of discussions and decisions. Case study vignettes were collated to illustrate the deliberations and decisions made throughout the model development process. RESULTS: The key analytic objectives and decision-making processes included: defining the model scope; analysing and refining the model structure to maximise local relevance and utility; reviewing and incorporating evidence to inform model parameters and assumptions; focusing the model on priority policy questions; communicating results and applying the models to policy processes. These stages did not occur sequentially; the model development was cyclical and iterative with decisions being re-visited and refined throughout the process. Storytelling was an effective strategy to both communicate and resolve concerns about the model logic and structure, and to communicate the outputs of the model to a broader audience. CONCLUSION: The in-depth analysis reported here examined the application of participatory modelling methods to move beyond qualitative conceptual mapping to the development of a rigorously quantified and policy relevant, complex dynamic simulation model. The analytic objectives and decision-making themes identified provide guidance for interpreting, understanding and reporting future participatory modelling projects and methods. Public Library of Science 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6597234/ /pubmed/31247006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218875 Text en © 2019 Freebairn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Freebairn, Louise
Atkinson, Jo-An
Osgood, Nathaniel D.
Kelly, Paul M.
McDonnell, Geoff
Rychetnik, Lucie
Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy
title Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy
title_full Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy
title_fullStr Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy
title_short Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy
title_sort turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: an australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31247006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218875
work_keys_str_mv AT freebairnlouise turningconceptualsystemsmapsintodynamicsimulationmodelsanaustraliancasestudyfordiabetesinpregnancy
AT atkinsonjoan turningconceptualsystemsmapsintodynamicsimulationmodelsanaustraliancasestudyfordiabetesinpregnancy
AT osgoodnathanield turningconceptualsystemsmapsintodynamicsimulationmodelsanaustraliancasestudyfordiabetesinpregnancy
AT kellypaulm turningconceptualsystemsmapsintodynamicsimulationmodelsanaustraliancasestudyfordiabetesinpregnancy
AT mcdonnellgeoff turningconceptualsystemsmapsintodynamicsimulationmodelsanaustraliancasestudyfordiabetesinpregnancy
AT rychetniklucie turningconceptualsystemsmapsintodynamicsimulationmodelsanaustraliancasestudyfordiabetesinpregnancy