Cargando…

Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background: Numerous studies reported that RAS-association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) methylation might act as diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer (BC), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the value of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC. Methods: Such databases as PubMed, Cochrane Li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Mingyi, Wang, Chunpeng, Yu, Binbin, Zhang, Xueyuan, Shi, Fang, Liu, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Portland Press Ltd. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190923
_version_ 1783430657776549888
author Li, Mingyi
Wang, Chunpeng
Yu, Binbin
Zhang, Xueyuan
Shi, Fang
Liu, Xin
author_facet Li, Mingyi
Wang, Chunpeng
Yu, Binbin
Zhang, Xueyuan
Shi, Fang
Liu, Xin
author_sort Li, Mingyi
collection PubMed
description Background: Numerous studies reported that RAS-association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) methylation might act as diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer (BC), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the value of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC. Methods: Such databases as PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for literatures until May 2019. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing STATA and Revman softwares. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was adopted to determine likely sources of heterogeneity. Results: Totally 19 literatures with 1849 patients and 1542 controls were included in the present study. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC were 0.49, 0.95, 19.0 and 0.83, respectively. The sensitivity (0.54 vs 0.43), DOR (30.0 vs 10.0) and AUC (0.84 vs 0.81) of RASSF1A methylation in Caucasian were higher than other ethnicities. The sensitivity (0.64 vs 0.57), DOR (21.0 vs 14.0) and AUC (0.89 vs 0.86) of methylation-specific PCR (MSP) were superior to other methods (q-MSP, OS-MSP and MethyLight). The sensitivity, DOR and AUC of serum RASSF1A methylation vs RASSF1A methylation in other samples (tissue or plasma) were 0.55 vs 0.40, 22.0 vs 14.0 and 0.86 vs 0.74, respectively. Conclusions: RASSF1A methylation might be a potential diagnostic biomarker for BC. Considering its low sensitivity and high specificity, it should combine with others to upgrade the sensitivity. Besides, under such conditions, MSP detection, serum RASSF1A methylation and Caucasian are shown to be more effective and suitable for diagnosing BC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6597854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Portland Press Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65978542019-07-05 Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis Li, Mingyi Wang, Chunpeng Yu, Binbin Zhang, Xueyuan Shi, Fang Liu, Xin Biosci Rep Research Articles Background: Numerous studies reported that RAS-association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) methylation might act as diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer (BC), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the value of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC. Methods: Such databases as PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for literatures until May 2019. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing STATA and Revman softwares. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was adopted to determine likely sources of heterogeneity. Results: Totally 19 literatures with 1849 patients and 1542 controls were included in the present study. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC were 0.49, 0.95, 19.0 and 0.83, respectively. The sensitivity (0.54 vs 0.43), DOR (30.0 vs 10.0) and AUC (0.84 vs 0.81) of RASSF1A methylation in Caucasian were higher than other ethnicities. The sensitivity (0.64 vs 0.57), DOR (21.0 vs 14.0) and AUC (0.89 vs 0.86) of methylation-specific PCR (MSP) were superior to other methods (q-MSP, OS-MSP and MethyLight). The sensitivity, DOR and AUC of serum RASSF1A methylation vs RASSF1A methylation in other samples (tissue or plasma) were 0.55 vs 0.40, 22.0 vs 14.0 and 0.86 vs 0.74, respectively. Conclusions: RASSF1A methylation might be a potential diagnostic biomarker for BC. Considering its low sensitivity and high specificity, it should combine with others to upgrade the sensitivity. Besides, under such conditions, MSP detection, serum RASSF1A methylation and Caucasian are shown to be more effective and suitable for diagnosing BC. Portland Press Ltd. 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6597854/ /pubmed/31196964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190923 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Li, Mingyi
Wang, Chunpeng
Yu, Binbin
Zhang, Xueyuan
Shi, Fang
Liu, Xin
Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
title Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic value of rassf1a methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190923
work_keys_str_mv AT limingyi diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT wangchunpeng diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT yubinbin diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT zhangxueyuan diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT shifang diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT liuxin diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis