Cargando…
Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
Background: Numerous studies reported that RAS-association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) methylation might act as diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer (BC), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the value of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC. Methods: Such databases as PubMed, Cochrane Li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Portland Press Ltd.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190923 |
_version_ | 1783430657776549888 |
---|---|
author | Li, Mingyi Wang, Chunpeng Yu, Binbin Zhang, Xueyuan Shi, Fang Liu, Xin |
author_facet | Li, Mingyi Wang, Chunpeng Yu, Binbin Zhang, Xueyuan Shi, Fang Liu, Xin |
author_sort | Li, Mingyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Numerous studies reported that RAS-association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) methylation might act as diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer (BC), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the value of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC. Methods: Such databases as PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for literatures until May 2019. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing STATA and Revman softwares. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was adopted to determine likely sources of heterogeneity. Results: Totally 19 literatures with 1849 patients and 1542 controls were included in the present study. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC were 0.49, 0.95, 19.0 and 0.83, respectively. The sensitivity (0.54 vs 0.43), DOR (30.0 vs 10.0) and AUC (0.84 vs 0.81) of RASSF1A methylation in Caucasian were higher than other ethnicities. The sensitivity (0.64 vs 0.57), DOR (21.0 vs 14.0) and AUC (0.89 vs 0.86) of methylation-specific PCR (MSP) were superior to other methods (q-MSP, OS-MSP and MethyLight). The sensitivity, DOR and AUC of serum RASSF1A methylation vs RASSF1A methylation in other samples (tissue or plasma) were 0.55 vs 0.40, 22.0 vs 14.0 and 0.86 vs 0.74, respectively. Conclusions: RASSF1A methylation might be a potential diagnostic biomarker for BC. Considering its low sensitivity and high specificity, it should combine with others to upgrade the sensitivity. Besides, under such conditions, MSP detection, serum RASSF1A methylation and Caucasian are shown to be more effective and suitable for diagnosing BC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6597854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Portland Press Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65978542019-07-05 Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis Li, Mingyi Wang, Chunpeng Yu, Binbin Zhang, Xueyuan Shi, Fang Liu, Xin Biosci Rep Research Articles Background: Numerous studies reported that RAS-association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) methylation might act as diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer (BC), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the value of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC. Methods: Such databases as PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for literatures until May 2019. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing STATA and Revman softwares. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was adopted to determine likely sources of heterogeneity. Results: Totally 19 literatures with 1849 patients and 1542 controls were included in the present study. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC were 0.49, 0.95, 19.0 and 0.83, respectively. The sensitivity (0.54 vs 0.43), DOR (30.0 vs 10.0) and AUC (0.84 vs 0.81) of RASSF1A methylation in Caucasian were higher than other ethnicities. The sensitivity (0.64 vs 0.57), DOR (21.0 vs 14.0) and AUC (0.89 vs 0.86) of methylation-specific PCR (MSP) were superior to other methods (q-MSP, OS-MSP and MethyLight). The sensitivity, DOR and AUC of serum RASSF1A methylation vs RASSF1A methylation in other samples (tissue or plasma) were 0.55 vs 0.40, 22.0 vs 14.0 and 0.86 vs 0.74, respectively. Conclusions: RASSF1A methylation might be a potential diagnostic biomarker for BC. Considering its low sensitivity and high specificity, it should combine with others to upgrade the sensitivity. Besides, under such conditions, MSP detection, serum RASSF1A methylation and Caucasian are shown to be more effective and suitable for diagnosing BC. Portland Press Ltd. 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6597854/ /pubmed/31196964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190923 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Li, Mingyi Wang, Chunpeng Yu, Binbin Zhang, Xueyuan Shi, Fang Liu, Xin Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic value of rassf1a methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limingyi diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis AT wangchunpeng diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis AT yubinbin diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis AT zhangxueyuan diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis AT shifang diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis AT liuxin diagnosticvalueofrassf1amethylationforbreastcancerametaanalysis |