Cargando…

The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism

BACKGROUND: This study compares the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism greater than − 10 D, and − 10 D or less respectively. METHODS: 60 eyes/patients were equally selected into group 1 (myopia and my...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Bing, Zhao, Jing, Li, Meiyan, Yao, Peijun, Zhou, Xingtao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31248387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1135-9
_version_ 1783430753587036160
author Qin, Bing
Zhao, Jing
Li, Meiyan
Yao, Peijun
Zhou, Xingtao
author_facet Qin, Bing
Zhao, Jing
Li, Meiyan
Yao, Peijun
Zhou, Xingtao
author_sort Qin, Bing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compares the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism greater than − 10 D, and − 10 D or less respectively. METHODS: 60 eyes/patients were equally selected into group 1 (myopia and myopic astigmatism of − 10 D or less) and group 2 (myopia and myopic astigmatism of over − 10 D), both of which were treated with SMILE. Visual and refractive outcomes, corneal higher-order aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions were evaluated preoperatively, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of group 1 and group 2 was − 0.069 ± 0.047 and − 0.053 ± 0.073 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.48). 100% eyes in group 1 and 97% in group 2 were within 1 D of targeted correction (P = 0.45). Meanwhile, 100% eyes in group 1 and 97% in group 2 had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better (P = 0.20). Changes in corneal higher-order aberrations root mean square, coma, and trefoil were similar between the two groups but spherical aberration was higher in group 2 (P < 0.01). Micro-distortions were observed in 53% in group 1 and 77% in group 2. More micro-distortions were observed in group 2 (3.40 ± 2.66) than in group 1 (2.07 ± 2.29) (P = 0.041). The total number of micro-distortions was not correlated with postoperative CDVA (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes showed similar results of SMILE for myopic correction of > − 10 D and ≤ − 10 D. Refractive outcomes showed slightly under-correction in higher myopic eyes. Higher myopic treatment tends to induce more spherical aberrations. Micro-distortions had no impact in visual and refractive outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6598346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65983462019-07-11 The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism Qin, Bing Zhao, Jing Li, Meiyan Yao, Peijun Zhou, Xingtao BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study compares the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism greater than − 10 D, and − 10 D or less respectively. METHODS: 60 eyes/patients were equally selected into group 1 (myopia and myopic astigmatism of − 10 D or less) and group 2 (myopia and myopic astigmatism of over − 10 D), both of which were treated with SMILE. Visual and refractive outcomes, corneal higher-order aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions were evaluated preoperatively, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of group 1 and group 2 was − 0.069 ± 0.047 and − 0.053 ± 0.073 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.48). 100% eyes in group 1 and 97% in group 2 were within 1 D of targeted correction (P = 0.45). Meanwhile, 100% eyes in group 1 and 97% in group 2 had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better (P = 0.20). Changes in corneal higher-order aberrations root mean square, coma, and trefoil were similar between the two groups but spherical aberration was higher in group 2 (P < 0.01). Micro-distortions were observed in 53% in group 1 and 77% in group 2. More micro-distortions were observed in group 2 (3.40 ± 2.66) than in group 1 (2.07 ± 2.29) (P = 0.041). The total number of micro-distortions was not correlated with postoperative CDVA (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes showed similar results of SMILE for myopic correction of > − 10 D and ≤ − 10 D. Refractive outcomes showed slightly under-correction in higher myopic eyes. Higher myopic treatment tends to induce more spherical aberrations. Micro-distortions had no impact in visual and refractive outcomes. BioMed Central 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6598346/ /pubmed/31248387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1135-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qin, Bing
Zhao, Jing
Li, Meiyan
Yao, Peijun
Zhou, Xingtao
The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism
title The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism
title_full The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism
title_fullStr The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism
title_short The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism
title_sort comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (smile) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31248387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1135-9
work_keys_str_mv AT qinbing thecomparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT zhaojing thecomparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT limeiyan thecomparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT yaopeijun thecomparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT zhouxingtao thecomparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT qinbing comparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT zhaojing comparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT limeiyan comparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT yaopeijun comparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism
AT zhouxingtao comparisonofvisualoutcomesaberrationsandbowmanslayermicrodistortionsafterfemtosecondlasersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileforthecorrectionofhighandmoderatemyopiaandmyopicastigmatism