Cargando…
Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early psychomotor recovery is an essential part of day care surgery which depends on brain integration of motor and sensory co-ordination. Even though dexmedetomidine is commonly used for day care procedures, the recovery profile was not studied. Hence, this study was designed t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303715 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_390_17 |
_version_ | 1783430800426926080 |
---|---|
author | Perika, Tilak Gupta, Suman Lata Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu Kattimani, Shivanand |
author_facet | Perika, Tilak Gupta, Suman Lata Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu Kattimani, Shivanand |
author_sort | Perika, Tilak |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early psychomotor recovery is an essential part of day care surgery which depends on brain integration of motor and sensory co-ordination. Even though dexmedetomidine is commonly used for day care procedures, the recovery profile was not studied. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate the psychomotor recovery of sedation with dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients were included. Group D received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (loading dose) followed by 0.2–1 μg/kg/hour. Group P received propofol infusion of 25–100 μg/kg/minute. Psychomotor recovery was assessed by finger-tapping, manual dexterity, visual spatial memory capacity, and pen and paper tests. Psychomotor tasks were given to the patients postoperatively at every 30 minutes for 2 hours followed by every hour up to 4 hours after surgery. Distribution of patients, age, weight, duration of surgery, and the level of sensory blockade was compared using independent t-test. Student's t-test has been used to find the significance of parameters such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), psychomotor recovery between two groups. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The motor recovery using finger tapping test was faster in Group D than Group P (73.94 ± 42.13 vs 101.21 ± 37.98 minutes, P–value = 0.007). Motor recovery using peg board test was faster in Group P than Group D (82.12 ± 40.37 vs 99.39 ± 43.08 minutes, P–value = 0.098). Visual spatial capacity memory test and pen and paper test were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients who received dexmedetomidine showed earlier recovery with finger tapping test. Hence, we suggest to use dexmedetomidine for complete psychomotor recovery and fast-track discharging of the patient after spinal anesthesia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6598570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65985702019-07-12 Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial Perika, Tilak Gupta, Suman Lata Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu Kattimani, Shivanand J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early psychomotor recovery is an essential part of day care surgery which depends on brain integration of motor and sensory co-ordination. Even though dexmedetomidine is commonly used for day care procedures, the recovery profile was not studied. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate the psychomotor recovery of sedation with dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients were included. Group D received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (loading dose) followed by 0.2–1 μg/kg/hour. Group P received propofol infusion of 25–100 μg/kg/minute. Psychomotor recovery was assessed by finger-tapping, manual dexterity, visual spatial memory capacity, and pen and paper tests. Psychomotor tasks were given to the patients postoperatively at every 30 minutes for 2 hours followed by every hour up to 4 hours after surgery. Distribution of patients, age, weight, duration of surgery, and the level of sensory blockade was compared using independent t-test. Student's t-test has been used to find the significance of parameters such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), psychomotor recovery between two groups. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The motor recovery using finger tapping test was faster in Group D than Group P (73.94 ± 42.13 vs 101.21 ± 37.98 minutes, P–value = 0.007). Motor recovery using peg board test was faster in Group P than Group D (82.12 ± 40.37 vs 99.39 ± 43.08 minutes, P–value = 0.098). Visual spatial capacity memory test and pen and paper test were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients who received dexmedetomidine showed earlier recovery with finger tapping test. Hence, we suggest to use dexmedetomidine for complete psychomotor recovery and fast-track discharging of the patient after spinal anesthesia. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6598570/ /pubmed/31303715 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_390_17 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Perika, Tilak Gupta, Suman Lata Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu Kattimani, Shivanand Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial |
title | Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial |
title_full | Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial |
title_fullStr | Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial |
title_short | Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial |
title_sort | psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: a randomized control trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303715 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_390_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perikatilak psychomotorrecoveryofdexmedetomidinecomparedwithpropofolaftersedationduringspinalanesthesiaarandomizedcontroltrial AT guptasumanlata psychomotorrecoveryofdexmedetomidinecomparedwithpropofolaftersedationduringspinalanesthesiaarandomizedcontroltrial AT elakkumananleninbabu psychomotorrecoveryofdexmedetomidinecomparedwithpropofolaftersedationduringspinalanesthesiaarandomizedcontroltrial AT kattimanishivanand psychomotorrecoveryofdexmedetomidinecomparedwithpropofolaftersedationduringspinalanesthesiaarandomizedcontroltrial |