Cargando…

Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early psychomotor recovery is an essential part of day care surgery which depends on brain integration of motor and sensory co-ordination. Even though dexmedetomidine is commonly used for day care procedures, the recovery profile was not studied. Hence, this study was designed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perika, Tilak, Gupta, Suman Lata, Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu, Kattimani, Shivanand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303715
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_390_17
_version_ 1783430800426926080
author Perika, Tilak
Gupta, Suman Lata
Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu
Kattimani, Shivanand
author_facet Perika, Tilak
Gupta, Suman Lata
Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu
Kattimani, Shivanand
author_sort Perika, Tilak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early psychomotor recovery is an essential part of day care surgery which depends on brain integration of motor and sensory co-ordination. Even though dexmedetomidine is commonly used for day care procedures, the recovery profile was not studied. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate the psychomotor recovery of sedation with dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients were included. Group D received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (loading dose) followed by 0.2–1 μg/kg/hour. Group P received propofol infusion of 25–100 μg/kg/minute. Psychomotor recovery was assessed by finger-tapping, manual dexterity, visual spatial memory capacity, and pen and paper tests. Psychomotor tasks were given to the patients postoperatively at every 30 minutes for 2 hours followed by every hour up to 4 hours after surgery. Distribution of patients, age, weight, duration of surgery, and the level of sensory blockade was compared using independent t-test. Student's t-test has been used to find the significance of parameters such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), psychomotor recovery between two groups. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The motor recovery using finger tapping test was faster in Group D than Group P (73.94 ± 42.13 vs 101.21 ± 37.98 minutes, P–value = 0.007). Motor recovery using peg board test was faster in Group P than Group D (82.12 ± 40.37 vs 99.39 ± 43.08 minutes, P–value = 0.098). Visual spatial capacity memory test and pen and paper test were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients who received dexmedetomidine showed earlier recovery with finger tapping test. Hence, we suggest to use dexmedetomidine for complete psychomotor recovery and fast-track discharging of the patient after spinal anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6598570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65985702019-07-12 Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial Perika, Tilak Gupta, Suman Lata Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu Kattimani, Shivanand J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early psychomotor recovery is an essential part of day care surgery which depends on brain integration of motor and sensory co-ordination. Even though dexmedetomidine is commonly used for day care procedures, the recovery profile was not studied. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate the psychomotor recovery of sedation with dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients were included. Group D received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (loading dose) followed by 0.2–1 μg/kg/hour. Group P received propofol infusion of 25–100 μg/kg/minute. Psychomotor recovery was assessed by finger-tapping, manual dexterity, visual spatial memory capacity, and pen and paper tests. Psychomotor tasks were given to the patients postoperatively at every 30 minutes for 2 hours followed by every hour up to 4 hours after surgery. Distribution of patients, age, weight, duration of surgery, and the level of sensory blockade was compared using independent t-test. Student's t-test has been used to find the significance of parameters such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), psychomotor recovery between two groups. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The motor recovery using finger tapping test was faster in Group D than Group P (73.94 ± 42.13 vs 101.21 ± 37.98 minutes, P–value = 0.007). Motor recovery using peg board test was faster in Group P than Group D (82.12 ± 40.37 vs 99.39 ± 43.08 minutes, P–value = 0.098). Visual spatial capacity memory test and pen and paper test were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients who received dexmedetomidine showed earlier recovery with finger tapping test. Hence, we suggest to use dexmedetomidine for complete psychomotor recovery and fast-track discharging of the patient after spinal anesthesia. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6598570/ /pubmed/31303715 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_390_17 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Perika, Tilak
Gupta, Suman Lata
Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu
Kattimani, Shivanand
Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial
title Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial
title_full Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial
title_fullStr Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial
title_short Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial
title_sort psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: a randomized control trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303715
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_390_17
work_keys_str_mv AT perikatilak psychomotorrecoveryofdexmedetomidinecomparedwithpropofolaftersedationduringspinalanesthesiaarandomizedcontroltrial
AT guptasumanlata psychomotorrecoveryofdexmedetomidinecomparedwithpropofolaftersedationduringspinalanesthesiaarandomizedcontroltrial
AT elakkumananleninbabu psychomotorrecoveryofdexmedetomidinecomparedwithpropofolaftersedationduringspinalanesthesiaarandomizedcontroltrial
AT kattimanishivanand psychomotorrecoveryofdexmedetomidinecomparedwithpropofolaftersedationduringspinalanesthesiaarandomizedcontroltrial