Cargando…

Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Central venous catheterization is a frequently performed procedure in anesthesia and critical care, and is indispensable in the practice of emergency medicine. Correct positioning of the central venous catheter (CVC) tip is often regarded as a secondary goal and there are variou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayaraman, Jayaprakash, Shah, Veena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303709
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_125_16
_version_ 1783430804122107904
author Jayaraman, Jayaprakash
Shah, Veena
author_facet Jayaraman, Jayaprakash
Shah, Veena
author_sort Jayaraman, Jayaprakash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Central venous catheterization is a frequently performed procedure in anesthesia and critical care, and is indispensable in the practice of emergency medicine. Correct positioning of the central venous catheter (CVC) tip is often regarded as a secondary goal and there are various complications that can occur due to abnormal position of the catheter tip. Different methods have been advocated to guide accurate prediction of optimal CVC depth insertion before or during the procedure at the bedside. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized double blinded study was conducted in 180 patients aged between 18 to 65 years requiring central venous catheterization. The optimal depth of insertion of right internal jugular vein (IJV) catheter using three different techniques, Peres' formula method, Landmark technique and Intra atrial Electrocardiography (ECG) guided technique was performed and the three techniques were compared with respect to optimal positioning using carina as a landmark in post procedural chest radiograph. Correct position of the catheter tip was considered upto 1 cm above or below the carina in post procedure X ray. RESULTS: The average final depth of insertion was 15.30 ± 0.62 cms in the Formula group, 12.74 ± 0.77 cms in landmark group and 12.64 ± 0.70 cms in ECG group. The vertical distance from carina was 0.91 ± 0.94 cms in formula group, 0.54 ± 0.67 cms in landmark group and 0.53 ± 0.43 cms in ECG group. The CVC tip was properly positioned within 1 cm above and below the carina in 58.33% patients in the formula group, 93.33% patients in landmark group and 96.67% patients in ECG group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that both landmark guidance and ECG guidance are comparable with regard to accurate central venous catheter tip positioning when CVCs are placed through right internal jugular vein whereas formula based technique is least accurate and results in over insertion of CVCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6598586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65985862019-07-12 Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques Jayaraman, Jayaprakash Shah, Veena J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Central venous catheterization is a frequently performed procedure in anesthesia and critical care, and is indispensable in the practice of emergency medicine. Correct positioning of the central venous catheter (CVC) tip is often regarded as a secondary goal and there are various complications that can occur due to abnormal position of the catheter tip. Different methods have been advocated to guide accurate prediction of optimal CVC depth insertion before or during the procedure at the bedside. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized double blinded study was conducted in 180 patients aged between 18 to 65 years requiring central venous catheterization. The optimal depth of insertion of right internal jugular vein (IJV) catheter using three different techniques, Peres' formula method, Landmark technique and Intra atrial Electrocardiography (ECG) guided technique was performed and the three techniques were compared with respect to optimal positioning using carina as a landmark in post procedural chest radiograph. Correct position of the catheter tip was considered upto 1 cm above or below the carina in post procedure X ray. RESULTS: The average final depth of insertion was 15.30 ± 0.62 cms in the Formula group, 12.74 ± 0.77 cms in landmark group and 12.64 ± 0.70 cms in ECG group. The vertical distance from carina was 0.91 ± 0.94 cms in formula group, 0.54 ± 0.67 cms in landmark group and 0.53 ± 0.43 cms in ECG group. The CVC tip was properly positioned within 1 cm above and below the carina in 58.33% patients in the formula group, 93.33% patients in landmark group and 96.67% patients in ECG group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that both landmark guidance and ECG guidance are comparable with regard to accurate central venous catheter tip positioning when CVCs are placed through right internal jugular vein whereas formula based technique is least accurate and results in over insertion of CVCs. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6598586/ /pubmed/31303709 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_125_16 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jayaraman, Jayaprakash
Shah, Veena
Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques
title Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques
title_full Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques
title_fullStr Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques
title_full_unstemmed Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques
title_short Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques
title_sort bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – comparison of different techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303709
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_125_16
work_keys_str_mv AT jayaramanjayaprakash bedsidepredictionofthecentralvenouscatheterinsertiondepthcomparisonofdifferenttechniques
AT shahveena bedsidepredictionofthecentralvenouscatheterinsertiondepthcomparisonofdifferenttechniques