Cargando…

Width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether preserved dorsal and ventral midsagittal tissue bridges after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) encode tract-specific electrophysiologic properties and are predictive of appropriate recovery. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, we retrospectively assessed MRI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vallotton, Kevin, Huber, Eveline, Sutter, Reto, Curt, Armin, Hupp, Markus, Freund, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007642
_version_ 1783430835539542016
author Vallotton, Kevin
Huber, Eveline
Sutter, Reto
Curt, Armin
Hupp, Markus
Freund, Patrick
author_facet Vallotton, Kevin
Huber, Eveline
Sutter, Reto
Curt, Armin
Hupp, Markus
Freund, Patrick
author_sort Vallotton, Kevin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess whether preserved dorsal and ventral midsagittal tissue bridges after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) encode tract-specific electrophysiologic properties and are predictive of appropriate recovery. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, we retrospectively assessed MRI scans at 1 month after SCI that provided data on width and location (dorsal vs ventral) of midsagittal tissue bridges in 28 tetraplegic patients. Regression analysis assessed associations between midsagittal tissue bridges and motor- and sensory-specific electrophysiologic recordings and appropriate outcome measures at 12 months after SCI. RESULTS: Greater width of dorsal midsagittal tissue bridges at 1 month after SCI identified patients who were classified as being sensory incomplete at 12 months after SCI (p = 0.025), had shorter sensory evoked potential (SEP) latencies (r = −0.57, p = 0.016), and had greater SEP amplitudes (r = 0.61, p = 0.001). Greater width of dorsal tissue bridges predicted better light-touch score at 12 months (r = 0.40, p = 0.045) independently of baseline clinical score and ventral tissue bridges. Greater width of ventral midsagittal tissue bridges at 1 month identified patients who were classified as being motor incomplete at 12 months (p = 0.002), revealed shorter motor evoked potential (MEP) latencies (r = −0.54, p = 0.044), and had greater ratios of MEP amplitude to compound muscle action potential amplitude (r = 0.56, p = 0.005). Greater width of ventral tissue bridges predicted better lower extremity motor scores at 12 months (r = 0.41, p = 0.035) independently of baseline clinical score and dorsal tissue bridges. CONCLUSION: Midsagittal tissue bridges, detectable early after SCI, underwrite tract-specific electrophysiologic communication and are predictors of appropriate sensorimotor recovery. Neuroimaging biomarkers of midsagittal tissue bridges may be integrated into the diagnostic workup, prediction of recovery, and patients' stratification in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6598793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65987932019-07-24 Width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury Vallotton, Kevin Huber, Eveline Sutter, Reto Curt, Armin Hupp, Markus Freund, Patrick Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To assess whether preserved dorsal and ventral midsagittal tissue bridges after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) encode tract-specific electrophysiologic properties and are predictive of appropriate recovery. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, we retrospectively assessed MRI scans at 1 month after SCI that provided data on width and location (dorsal vs ventral) of midsagittal tissue bridges in 28 tetraplegic patients. Regression analysis assessed associations between midsagittal tissue bridges and motor- and sensory-specific electrophysiologic recordings and appropriate outcome measures at 12 months after SCI. RESULTS: Greater width of dorsal midsagittal tissue bridges at 1 month after SCI identified patients who were classified as being sensory incomplete at 12 months after SCI (p = 0.025), had shorter sensory evoked potential (SEP) latencies (r = −0.57, p = 0.016), and had greater SEP amplitudes (r = 0.61, p = 0.001). Greater width of dorsal tissue bridges predicted better light-touch score at 12 months (r = 0.40, p = 0.045) independently of baseline clinical score and ventral tissue bridges. Greater width of ventral midsagittal tissue bridges at 1 month identified patients who were classified as being motor incomplete at 12 months (p = 0.002), revealed shorter motor evoked potential (MEP) latencies (r = −0.54, p = 0.044), and had greater ratios of MEP amplitude to compound muscle action potential amplitude (r = 0.56, p = 0.005). Greater width of ventral tissue bridges predicted better lower extremity motor scores at 12 months (r = 0.41, p = 0.035) independently of baseline clinical score and dorsal tissue bridges. CONCLUSION: Midsagittal tissue bridges, detectable early after SCI, underwrite tract-specific electrophysiologic communication and are predictors of appropriate sensorimotor recovery. Neuroimaging biomarkers of midsagittal tissue bridges may be integrated into the diagnostic workup, prediction of recovery, and patients' stratification in clinical trials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6598793/ /pubmed/31092621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007642 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Vallotton, Kevin
Huber, Eveline
Sutter, Reto
Curt, Armin
Hupp, Markus
Freund, Patrick
Width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury
title Width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury
title_full Width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury
title_fullStr Width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury
title_full_unstemmed Width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury
title_short Width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury
title_sort width and neurophysiologic properties of tissue bridges predict recovery after cervical injury
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007642
work_keys_str_mv AT vallottonkevin widthandneurophysiologicpropertiesoftissuebridgespredictrecoveryaftercervicalinjury
AT hubereveline widthandneurophysiologicpropertiesoftissuebridgespredictrecoveryaftercervicalinjury
AT sutterreto widthandneurophysiologicpropertiesoftissuebridgespredictrecoveryaftercervicalinjury
AT curtarmin widthandneurophysiologicpropertiesoftissuebridgespredictrecoveryaftercervicalinjury
AT huppmarkus widthandneurophysiologicpropertiesoftissuebridgespredictrecoveryaftercervicalinjury
AT freundpatrick widthandneurophysiologicpropertiesoftissuebridgespredictrecoveryaftercervicalinjury