Cargando…
Direct comparison of [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([(18)F] FET) and [(11)C] choline. METHODS: Eight...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8 |
_version_ | 1783430864654303232 |
---|---|
author | Verburg, Niels Koopman, Thomas Yaqub, Maqsood Hoekstra, Otto S. Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Schwarte, Lothar A. Barkhof, Frederik Pouwels, Petra J. W. Heimans, Jan J. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Rozemuller, Annemieke J. M. Vandertop, William P. Wesseling, Pieter Boellaard, Ronald de Witt Hamer, Philip C. |
author_facet | Verburg, Niels Koopman, Thomas Yaqub, Maqsood Hoekstra, Otto S. Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Schwarte, Lothar A. Barkhof, Frederik Pouwels, Petra J. W. Heimans, Jan J. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Rozemuller, Annemieke J. M. Vandertop, William P. Wesseling, Pieter Boellaard, Ronald de Witt Hamer, Philip C. |
author_sort | Verburg, Niels |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([(18)F] FET) and [(11)C] choline. METHODS: Eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed diffuse glioma underwent dynamic [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET scans. Preceding craniotomy, multiple stereotactic biopsies were obtained from regions inside and outside PET abnormalities. Biopsies were assessed independently for tumour presence by two neuropathologists. Imaging measurements were derived at the biopsy locations from 10 to 40 min [(11)C] choline and 20–40, 40–60 and 60–90 min [(18)F] FET intervals, as standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR). Diagnostic accuracies of both tracers were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis and generalized linear mixed modelling with consensus histopathological assessment as reference. RESULTS: Of the 74 biopsies, 54 (73%) contained tumour. [(11)C] choline SUV and [(18)F] FET SUV and TBR at all intervals were higher in tumour than in normal samples. For [(18)F] FET, the diagnostic accuracy of TBR was higher than that of SUV for intervals 40–60 min (area under the curve: 0.88 versus 0.81, p = 0.026) and 60–90 min (0.90 versus 0.81, p = 0.047). The diagnostic accuracy of [(18)F] FET TBR 60–90 min was higher than that of [(11)C] choline SUV 20–40 min (0.87 versus 0.67, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F] FET was more accurate than [(11)C] choline for detecting glioma infiltration. Highest accuracy was found for [(18)F] FET TBR for the interval 60–90 min post-injection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6598977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65989772019-07-18 Direct comparison of [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients Verburg, Niels Koopman, Thomas Yaqub, Maqsood Hoekstra, Otto S. Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Schwarte, Lothar A. Barkhof, Frederik Pouwels, Petra J. W. Heimans, Jan J. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Rozemuller, Annemieke J. M. Vandertop, William P. Wesseling, Pieter Boellaard, Ronald de Witt Hamer, Philip C. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([(18)F] FET) and [(11)C] choline. METHODS: Eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed diffuse glioma underwent dynamic [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET scans. Preceding craniotomy, multiple stereotactic biopsies were obtained from regions inside and outside PET abnormalities. Biopsies were assessed independently for tumour presence by two neuropathologists. Imaging measurements were derived at the biopsy locations from 10 to 40 min [(11)C] choline and 20–40, 40–60 and 60–90 min [(18)F] FET intervals, as standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR). Diagnostic accuracies of both tracers were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis and generalized linear mixed modelling with consensus histopathological assessment as reference. RESULTS: Of the 74 biopsies, 54 (73%) contained tumour. [(11)C] choline SUV and [(18)F] FET SUV and TBR at all intervals were higher in tumour than in normal samples. For [(18)F] FET, the diagnostic accuracy of TBR was higher than that of SUV for intervals 40–60 min (area under the curve: 0.88 versus 0.81, p = 0.026) and 60–90 min (0.90 versus 0.81, p = 0.047). The diagnostic accuracy of [(18)F] FET TBR 60–90 min was higher than that of [(11)C] choline SUV 20–40 min (0.87 versus 0.67, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F] FET was more accurate than [(11)C] choline for detecting glioma infiltration. Highest accuracy was found for [(18)F] FET TBR for the interval 60–90 min post-injection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6598977/ /pubmed/31254208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Verburg, Niels Koopman, Thomas Yaqub, Maqsood Hoekstra, Otto S. Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Schwarte, Lothar A. Barkhof, Frederik Pouwels, Petra J. W. Heimans, Jan J. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Rozemuller, Annemieke J. M. Vandertop, William P. Wesseling, Pieter Boellaard, Ronald de Witt Hamer, Philip C. Direct comparison of [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title | Direct comparison of [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_full | Direct comparison of [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_fullStr | Direct comparison of [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct comparison of [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_short | Direct comparison of [(11)C] choline and [(18)F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_sort | direct comparison of [(11)c] choline and [(18)f] fet pet to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verburgniels directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT koopmanthomas directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT yaqubmaqsood directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT hoekstraottos directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT lammertsmaadriaana directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT schwartelothara directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT barkhoffrederik directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT pouwelspetrajw directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT heimansjanj directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT reijneveldjaapc directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT rozemullerannemiekejm directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT vandertopwilliamp directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT wesselingpieter directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT boellaardronald directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT dewitthamerphilipc directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients |