Cargando…

Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using ticagrelor (T-DAPT) versus clopidogrel (C-DAPT) in a real-world ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 655 consecutive patients having...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hee, Leia, Gibbs, Oliver J., Assad, Joseph G., Sharma, Lokesh D., Hopkins, Andrew, Juergens, Craig P., Lo, Sidney, Mussap, Christian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsha.2019.05.005
_version_ 1783430890315055104
author Hee, Leia
Gibbs, Oliver J.
Assad, Joseph G.
Sharma, Lokesh D.
Hopkins, Andrew
Juergens, Craig P.
Lo, Sidney
Mussap, Christian J.
author_facet Hee, Leia
Gibbs, Oliver J.
Assad, Joseph G.
Sharma, Lokesh D.
Hopkins, Andrew
Juergens, Craig P.
Lo, Sidney
Mussap, Christian J.
author_sort Hee, Leia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using ticagrelor (T-DAPT) versus clopidogrel (C-DAPT) in a real-world ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 655 consecutive patients having primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia (from January 2013 to April 2016). Medical and procedural therapies were at clinician discretion. Patient data were retrieved from hospital records and primary clinicians. RESULTS: T-DAPT (65%) was used more frequently, and in patients with lower mean CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) score, than C-DAPT (24.6 vs. 32.2; p < 0.0001, respectively). All-cause mortality was 9.0% at 2.7 years follow-up, with fewer deaths for T-DAPT (4.5% vs. 17.2%; p < 0.0001). T-DAPT incurred less BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) 3–5 major bleeding (5.0% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001). Multivariate regression showed that C-DAPT, GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events) score, and renal insufficiency were independently associated with mortality. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and GRACE score independently predicted BARC 3–5 bleeding. Early DAPT discontinuation (1.7%) and ticagrelor intolerance (7.6%) was rare. Switching DAPT regimen was infrequent (21.7%) and mostly attributed to clinician preference (73.2%). Independent determinants of C-DAPT selection were older age, diabetes, prior PCI, IABP, and higher CRUSADE score. CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor was preferred in low bleeding risk patients, which may have contributed to less BARC 3–5 bleeding and lower mortality for T-DAPT. Thus, bleeding mitigation is a clinical priority when selecting DAPT for PCI-treated STEMI patients. Continuation of initial DAPT regimen was typical, but early switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor shows willingness to optimize DAPT. Patients with very low CRUSADE scores (<21.5) may be appropriate for switching to a potent P2Y12 inhibitor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65990872019-07-11 Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study Hee, Leia Gibbs, Oliver J. Assad, Joseph G. Sharma, Lokesh D. Hopkins, Andrew Juergens, Craig P. Lo, Sidney Mussap, Christian J. J Saudi Heart Assoc Original Article OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using ticagrelor (T-DAPT) versus clopidogrel (C-DAPT) in a real-world ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 655 consecutive patients having primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia (from January 2013 to April 2016). Medical and procedural therapies were at clinician discretion. Patient data were retrieved from hospital records and primary clinicians. RESULTS: T-DAPT (65%) was used more frequently, and in patients with lower mean CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) score, than C-DAPT (24.6 vs. 32.2; p < 0.0001, respectively). All-cause mortality was 9.0% at 2.7 years follow-up, with fewer deaths for T-DAPT (4.5% vs. 17.2%; p < 0.0001). T-DAPT incurred less BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) 3–5 major bleeding (5.0% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001). Multivariate regression showed that C-DAPT, GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events) score, and renal insufficiency were independently associated with mortality. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and GRACE score independently predicted BARC 3–5 bleeding. Early DAPT discontinuation (1.7%) and ticagrelor intolerance (7.6%) was rare. Switching DAPT regimen was infrequent (21.7%) and mostly attributed to clinician preference (73.2%). Independent determinants of C-DAPT selection were older age, diabetes, prior PCI, IABP, and higher CRUSADE score. CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor was preferred in low bleeding risk patients, which may have contributed to less BARC 3–5 bleeding and lower mortality for T-DAPT. Thus, bleeding mitigation is a clinical priority when selecting DAPT for PCI-treated STEMI patients. Continuation of initial DAPT regimen was typical, but early switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor shows willingness to optimize DAPT. Patients with very low CRUSADE scores (<21.5) may be appropriate for switching to a potent P2Y12 inhibitor. Elsevier 2019-10 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6599087/ /pubmed/31296977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsha.2019.05.005 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hee, Leia
Gibbs, Oliver J.
Assad, Joseph G.
Sharma, Lokesh D.
Hopkins, Andrew
Juergens, Craig P.
Lo, Sidney
Mussap, Christian J.
Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study
title Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study
title_full Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study
title_fullStr Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study
title_full_unstemmed Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study
title_short Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study
title_sort real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated st-elevation myocardial infarction patients: a single-center registry study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsha.2019.05.005
work_keys_str_mv AT heeleia realworlduseofticagrelorversusclopidogrelinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontreatedstelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsasinglecenterregistrystudy
AT gibbsoliverj realworlduseofticagrelorversusclopidogrelinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontreatedstelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsasinglecenterregistrystudy
AT assadjosephg realworlduseofticagrelorversusclopidogrelinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontreatedstelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsasinglecenterregistrystudy
AT sharmalokeshd realworlduseofticagrelorversusclopidogrelinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontreatedstelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsasinglecenterregistrystudy
AT hopkinsandrew realworlduseofticagrelorversusclopidogrelinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontreatedstelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsasinglecenterregistrystudy
AT juergenscraigp realworlduseofticagrelorversusclopidogrelinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontreatedstelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsasinglecenterregistrystudy
AT losidney realworlduseofticagrelorversusclopidogrelinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontreatedstelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsasinglecenterregistrystudy
AT mussapchristianj realworlduseofticagrelorversusclopidogrelinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontreatedstelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientsasinglecenterregistrystudy