Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy

BACKGROUND: Published literature suggests that early treatment with natalizumab (“escalation strategy”) is more effective than switch within the same class of immunomodulators (interferons/glatiramer acetate, “switching strategy”) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who failed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furneri, Gianluca, Santoni, Laura, Ricella, Chiara, Prosperini, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31253138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4264-1
_version_ 1783430920898871296
author Furneri, Gianluca
Santoni, Laura
Ricella, Chiara
Prosperini, Luca
author_facet Furneri, Gianluca
Santoni, Laura
Ricella, Chiara
Prosperini, Luca
author_sort Furneri, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Published literature suggests that early treatment with natalizumab (“escalation strategy”) is more effective than switch within the same class of immunomodulators (interferons/glatiramer acetate, “switching strategy”) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who failed first-line self-injectable disease-modifying treatment (DMT). The present analysis aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness profile of escalation strategy vs. switching strategy, adopting the Italian societal perspective. METHODS: A lifetime horizon Markov model was developed to compare early escalation to natalizumab vs. switching among immunomodulators, followed by subsequent escalation to natalizumab. The two compared treatment algorithms were: a) early escalation until progression to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) = 7.0 vs. b) switching until EDSS = 4.0, followed by escalation until EDSS = 7.0. The model analyzed social costs, quality-adjusted survival and effects of therapies in prolonging time without disability progression and burden of relapses. Clinical data were mainly extracted from a published observational study. RESULTS: Lifetime costs of early escalation to natalizumab and switching among immunomodulators amounted to €699,700 and €718,600 per patient, respectively. Early escalation was associated with prolonged quality-adjusted survival (11.19 vs. 9.67 QALYs, + 15.8%). A slight overall survival increase was also observed (20.10 vs. 19.67 life years). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting the Italian social perspective, early escalation to natalizumab is dominant vs. switching among immunomodulators, in RRMS patients who do not respond adequately to conventional immunomodulators. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4264-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65992372019-07-11 Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy Furneri, Gianluca Santoni, Laura Ricella, Chiara Prosperini, Luca BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Published literature suggests that early treatment with natalizumab (“escalation strategy”) is more effective than switch within the same class of immunomodulators (interferons/glatiramer acetate, “switching strategy”) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who failed first-line self-injectable disease-modifying treatment (DMT). The present analysis aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness profile of escalation strategy vs. switching strategy, adopting the Italian societal perspective. METHODS: A lifetime horizon Markov model was developed to compare early escalation to natalizumab vs. switching among immunomodulators, followed by subsequent escalation to natalizumab. The two compared treatment algorithms were: a) early escalation until progression to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) = 7.0 vs. b) switching until EDSS = 4.0, followed by escalation until EDSS = 7.0. The model analyzed social costs, quality-adjusted survival and effects of therapies in prolonging time without disability progression and burden of relapses. Clinical data were mainly extracted from a published observational study. RESULTS: Lifetime costs of early escalation to natalizumab and switching among immunomodulators amounted to €699,700 and €718,600 per patient, respectively. Early escalation was associated with prolonged quality-adjusted survival (11.19 vs. 9.67 QALYs, + 15.8%). A slight overall survival increase was also observed (20.10 vs. 19.67 life years). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting the Italian social perspective, early escalation to natalizumab is dominant vs. switching among immunomodulators, in RRMS patients who do not respond adequately to conventional immunomodulators. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4264-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6599237/ /pubmed/31253138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4264-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Furneri, Gianluca
Santoni, Laura
Ricella, Chiara
Prosperini, Luca
Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in italy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31253138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4264-1
work_keys_str_mv AT furnerigianluca costeffectivenessanalysisofescalatingtonatalizumaborswitchingamongimmunomodulatorsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinitaly
AT santonilaura costeffectivenessanalysisofescalatingtonatalizumaborswitchingamongimmunomodulatorsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinitaly
AT ricellachiara costeffectivenessanalysisofescalatingtonatalizumaborswitchingamongimmunomodulatorsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinitaly
AT prosperiniluca costeffectivenessanalysisofescalatingtonatalizumaborswitchingamongimmunomodulatorsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinitaly