Cargando…

Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?

BACKGROUND: The male bias in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnoses is well documented. As a result, less is known about the female ASD phenotype. Recent research suggests that conclusions drawn from predominantly male samples may not accurately capture female behavior. In this study, we explore p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrop, Clare, Jones, Desiree, Zheng, Shuting, Nowell, Sallie, Schultz, Robert, Parish-Morris, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0276-2
_version_ 1783430926056816640
author Harrop, Clare
Jones, Desiree
Zheng, Shuting
Nowell, Sallie
Schultz, Robert
Parish-Morris, Julia
author_facet Harrop, Clare
Jones, Desiree
Zheng, Shuting
Nowell, Sallie
Schultz, Robert
Parish-Morris, Julia
author_sort Harrop, Clare
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The male bias in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnoses is well documented. As a result, less is known about the female ASD phenotype. Recent research suggests that conclusions drawn from predominantly male samples may not accurately capture female behavior. In this study, we explore potential sex differences in attention to social stimuli, which is generally reported to be diminished in ASD. Population-based sex differences in attention to faces have been reported, such that typically developing (TD) females attend more to social stimuli (including faces) from infancy through adulthood than TD males. It is yet unknown whether population-based sex differences in the face domain are preserved in ASD. METHODS: A dynamic, naturalistic infrared eye-tracking paradigm measured attention to social stimuli (faces) in 74 school-aged males and females with ASD (male N = 23; female N = 19) and without ASD (male N = 16; female N = 16). Two kinds of video stimuli were presented that varied in social content: rich social scenes (dyadic play between two children) and lean social scenes (parallel play by two children). RESULTS: Results revealed a significant 3-way interaction between sex, diagnosis, and condition after controlling for chronological and mental age. ASD females attended more to faces than ASD males in the socially lean condition. This effect was not found in the typically developing (TD) group. ASD males attended less to faces regardless of social context; however, ASD females only attended significantly less to faces compared to TD females in the socially rich condition. TD males and ASD females did not differ in their attention to faces in either condition. CONCLUSIONS: This study has implications for how the field understands core social deficits in children with ASD, which should ideally be benchmarked against same-sex peers (male and female). Social attention in ASD females fell on a continuum—greater than their ASD male peers, but not as great as TD females. Overall, their social attention mirrored that of TD males. Improved understanding of the female social phenotype in ASD will enhance early screening and diagnostic efforts and will guide the development of sex-sensitive experimental paradigms and social interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65992592019-07-11 Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences? Harrop, Clare Jones, Desiree Zheng, Shuting Nowell, Sallie Schultz, Robert Parish-Morris, Julia Mol Autism Research BACKGROUND: The male bias in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnoses is well documented. As a result, less is known about the female ASD phenotype. Recent research suggests that conclusions drawn from predominantly male samples may not accurately capture female behavior. In this study, we explore potential sex differences in attention to social stimuli, which is generally reported to be diminished in ASD. Population-based sex differences in attention to faces have been reported, such that typically developing (TD) females attend more to social stimuli (including faces) from infancy through adulthood than TD males. It is yet unknown whether population-based sex differences in the face domain are preserved in ASD. METHODS: A dynamic, naturalistic infrared eye-tracking paradigm measured attention to social stimuli (faces) in 74 school-aged males and females with ASD (male N = 23; female N = 19) and without ASD (male N = 16; female N = 16). Two kinds of video stimuli were presented that varied in social content: rich social scenes (dyadic play between two children) and lean social scenes (parallel play by two children). RESULTS: Results revealed a significant 3-way interaction between sex, diagnosis, and condition after controlling for chronological and mental age. ASD females attended more to faces than ASD males in the socially lean condition. This effect was not found in the typically developing (TD) group. ASD males attended less to faces regardless of social context; however, ASD females only attended significantly less to faces compared to TD females in the socially rich condition. TD males and ASD females did not differ in their attention to faces in either condition. CONCLUSIONS: This study has implications for how the field understands core social deficits in children with ASD, which should ideally be benchmarked against same-sex peers (male and female). Social attention in ASD females fell on a continuum—greater than their ASD male peers, but not as great as TD females. Overall, their social attention mirrored that of TD males. Improved understanding of the female social phenotype in ASD will enhance early screening and diagnostic efforts and will guide the development of sex-sensitive experimental paradigms and social interventions. BioMed Central 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6599259/ /pubmed/31297179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0276-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Harrop, Clare
Jones, Desiree
Zheng, Shuting
Nowell, Sallie
Schultz, Robert
Parish-Morris, Julia
Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?
title Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?
title_full Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?
title_fullStr Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?
title_full_unstemmed Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?
title_short Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?
title_sort visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0276-2
work_keys_str_mv AT harropclare visualattentiontofacesinchildrenwithautismspectrumdisorderaretheresexdifferences
AT jonesdesiree visualattentiontofacesinchildrenwithautismspectrumdisorderaretheresexdifferences
AT zhengshuting visualattentiontofacesinchildrenwithautismspectrumdisorderaretheresexdifferences
AT nowellsallie visualattentiontofacesinchildrenwithautismspectrumdisorderaretheresexdifferences
AT schultzrobert visualattentiontofacesinchildrenwithautismspectrumdisorderaretheresexdifferences
AT parishmorrisjulia visualattentiontofacesinchildrenwithautismspectrumdisorderaretheresexdifferences