Cargando…
Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves
BACKGROUND: This study compared long-term outcomes of biological and mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients requiring replacement of the mitral valve where repair was not feasible. METHODS: A single-centre registry of patients receiving MVR between 2005 and 2015 was established. Thirt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31253187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0943-6 |
_version_ | 1783430931273482240 |
---|---|
author | Cetinkaya, Ayse Poggenpohl, Julia Bramlage, Karin Hein, Stefan Doss, Mirko Bramlage, Peter Schönburg, Markus Richter, Manfred |
author_facet | Cetinkaya, Ayse Poggenpohl, Julia Bramlage, Karin Hein, Stefan Doss, Mirko Bramlage, Peter Schönburg, Markus Richter, Manfred |
author_sort | Cetinkaya, Ayse |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study compared long-term outcomes of biological and mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients requiring replacement of the mitral valve where repair was not feasible. METHODS: A single-centre registry of patients receiving MVR between 2005 and 2015 was established. Thirty-day mortality and long-term outcomes were analysed and compared. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty four patients underwent MVR (265 biological; 59 mechanical valves). Patients receiving biological valves were older (p < 0.001), had a higher log EuroSCORE (p < 0.001) and received less minimally invasive surgery (p < 0.001). Immediate procedural mortality was 1.9%, which only occurred in the biological valve group. At 30 days, 9.0% of patients had died, 4.0% experienced stroke, 8.0% received a pacemaker and 10.5% suffered an acute renal failure. The rate of re-thoracotomy (14.2%) was lower in the biological (12.5%) than in the mechanical valve group (22.0%; adjOR 0.45 [0.20–1.00]; p = 0.050). Frequent long-term complications were stroke (9.2%) and bleeding (4.8%), with bleeding complications being higher in the mechanical valve group (p = 0.009). During the follow-up period biological valves showed a numerically higher survival rate during the first years, which shifted after 3 years in favour of mechanical valves. At 10 years, survival rates were 62.4% vs. 77.1% in the biological and mechanical valve groups (p = 0.769). Hazard ratio after adjustment was 0.833 (95% CI 0.430–1.615). CONCLUSION: These data confirm that mechanical valve implantation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. While there was a potential survival benefit during the first years after surgery for patients receiving a biological valves the difference became insignificant after a follow-up of 10 years. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13019-019-0943-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6599286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65992862019-07-11 Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves Cetinkaya, Ayse Poggenpohl, Julia Bramlage, Karin Hein, Stefan Doss, Mirko Bramlage, Peter Schönburg, Markus Richter, Manfred J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: This study compared long-term outcomes of biological and mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients requiring replacement of the mitral valve where repair was not feasible. METHODS: A single-centre registry of patients receiving MVR between 2005 and 2015 was established. Thirty-day mortality and long-term outcomes were analysed and compared. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty four patients underwent MVR (265 biological; 59 mechanical valves). Patients receiving biological valves were older (p < 0.001), had a higher log EuroSCORE (p < 0.001) and received less minimally invasive surgery (p < 0.001). Immediate procedural mortality was 1.9%, which only occurred in the biological valve group. At 30 days, 9.0% of patients had died, 4.0% experienced stroke, 8.0% received a pacemaker and 10.5% suffered an acute renal failure. The rate of re-thoracotomy (14.2%) was lower in the biological (12.5%) than in the mechanical valve group (22.0%; adjOR 0.45 [0.20–1.00]; p = 0.050). Frequent long-term complications were stroke (9.2%) and bleeding (4.8%), with bleeding complications being higher in the mechanical valve group (p = 0.009). During the follow-up period biological valves showed a numerically higher survival rate during the first years, which shifted after 3 years in favour of mechanical valves. At 10 years, survival rates were 62.4% vs. 77.1% in the biological and mechanical valve groups (p = 0.769). Hazard ratio after adjustment was 0.833 (95% CI 0.430–1.615). CONCLUSION: These data confirm that mechanical valve implantation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. While there was a potential survival benefit during the first years after surgery for patients receiving a biological valves the difference became insignificant after a follow-up of 10 years. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13019-019-0943-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6599286/ /pubmed/31253187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0943-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cetinkaya, Ayse Poggenpohl, Julia Bramlage, Karin Hein, Stefan Doss, Mirko Bramlage, Peter Schönburg, Markus Richter, Manfred Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves |
title | Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves |
title_full | Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves |
title_fullStr | Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves |
title_short | Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves |
title_sort | long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31253187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0943-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cetinkayaayse longtermoutcomeaftermitralvalvereplacementusingbiologicalversusmechanicalvalves AT poggenpohljulia longtermoutcomeaftermitralvalvereplacementusingbiologicalversusmechanicalvalves AT bramlagekarin longtermoutcomeaftermitralvalvereplacementusingbiologicalversusmechanicalvalves AT heinstefan longtermoutcomeaftermitralvalvereplacementusingbiologicalversusmechanicalvalves AT dossmirko longtermoutcomeaftermitralvalvereplacementusingbiologicalversusmechanicalvalves AT bramlagepeter longtermoutcomeaftermitralvalvereplacementusingbiologicalversusmechanicalvalves AT schonburgmarkus longtermoutcomeaftermitralvalvereplacementusingbiologicalversusmechanicalvalves AT richtermanfred longtermoutcomeaftermitralvalvereplacementusingbiologicalversusmechanicalvalves |