Cargando…

A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are very common in elderly patients, who present at the Emergency Department. Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation using volar locking plates is widely prevalent despite the lack of evidence proving its superiority to conservative tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedersen, Jonas, Mortensen, Simon Oksbjerre, Rölfing, Jan Duedal, Thorninger, Rikke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31253145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2677-y
_version_ 1783430936051843072
author Pedersen, Jonas
Mortensen, Simon Oksbjerre
Rölfing, Jan Duedal
Thorninger, Rikke
author_facet Pedersen, Jonas
Mortensen, Simon Oksbjerre
Rölfing, Jan Duedal
Thorninger, Rikke
author_sort Pedersen, Jonas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are very common in elderly patients, who present at the Emergency Department. Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation using volar locking plates is widely prevalent despite the lack of evidence proving its superiority to conservative treatment with closed reduction and plaster immobilization. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether conservative treatment is superior to volar plating in terms of number of complications and results in a comparable or superior functional outcome in patients ≥65 years. METHODS: In this single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial, patients ≥65 years with distal radius fractures will be invited to participate. A total of 50 patients per treatment arm is required to provide 80% statistical power at a 5% alpha level assuming a difference of 20% in complication rate between operatively and conservatively treated patients. Primary outcome measures will be complication rate, Quick DASH score (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), PRWE (Patient rated Wrist evaluation), and range of motion of the wrist. Secondary outcome measures will be grip strength, pinch gauge, pain, use of pain medication EQ5D score (European Quality of life – 5 dimensions), standardized radiographs. One year of follow-up is planned with data collection at the day of injury, after 2 weeks, after 5 weeks, after 6 months, and after 12 months. An intention-totreat and per-protocol analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: This prospective trial helps to clarify the best treatment strategy for displaced DRF patients ≥65 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is approved by the Danish Scientific Ethical Committee (ID: 1–10–72-420-17) and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Trial registration number NCT03716661).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65993062019-07-11 A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years Pedersen, Jonas Mortensen, Simon Oksbjerre Rölfing, Jan Duedal Thorninger, Rikke BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are very common in elderly patients, who present at the Emergency Department. Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation using volar locking plates is widely prevalent despite the lack of evidence proving its superiority to conservative treatment with closed reduction and plaster immobilization. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether conservative treatment is superior to volar plating in terms of number of complications and results in a comparable or superior functional outcome in patients ≥65 years. METHODS: In this single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial, patients ≥65 years with distal radius fractures will be invited to participate. A total of 50 patients per treatment arm is required to provide 80% statistical power at a 5% alpha level assuming a difference of 20% in complication rate between operatively and conservatively treated patients. Primary outcome measures will be complication rate, Quick DASH score (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), PRWE (Patient rated Wrist evaluation), and range of motion of the wrist. Secondary outcome measures will be grip strength, pinch gauge, pain, use of pain medication EQ5D score (European Quality of life – 5 dimensions), standardized radiographs. One year of follow-up is planned with data collection at the day of injury, after 2 weeks, after 5 weeks, after 6 months, and after 12 months. An intention-totreat and per-protocol analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: This prospective trial helps to clarify the best treatment strategy for displaced DRF patients ≥65 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is approved by the Danish Scientific Ethical Committee (ID: 1–10–72-420-17) and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Trial registration number NCT03716661). BioMed Central 2019-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6599306/ /pubmed/31253145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2677-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Pedersen, Jonas
Mortensen, Simon Oksbjerre
Rölfing, Jan Duedal
Thorninger, Rikke
A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years
title A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years
title_full A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years
title_fullStr A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years
title_full_unstemmed A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years
title_short A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years
title_sort protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31253145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2677-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pedersenjonas aprotocolforasinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialinvestigatingvolarplatingversusconservativetreatmentofunstabledistalradiusfracturesinpatientsolderthan65years
AT mortensensimonoksbjerre aprotocolforasinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialinvestigatingvolarplatingversusconservativetreatmentofunstabledistalradiusfracturesinpatientsolderthan65years
AT rolfingjanduedal aprotocolforasinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialinvestigatingvolarplatingversusconservativetreatmentofunstabledistalradiusfracturesinpatientsolderthan65years
AT thorningerrikke aprotocolforasinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialinvestigatingvolarplatingversusconservativetreatmentofunstabledistalradiusfracturesinpatientsolderthan65years
AT pedersenjonas protocolforasinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialinvestigatingvolarplatingversusconservativetreatmentofunstabledistalradiusfracturesinpatientsolderthan65years
AT mortensensimonoksbjerre protocolforasinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialinvestigatingvolarplatingversusconservativetreatmentofunstabledistalradiusfracturesinpatientsolderthan65years
AT rolfingjanduedal protocolforasinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialinvestigatingvolarplatingversusconservativetreatmentofunstabledistalradiusfracturesinpatientsolderthan65years
AT thorningerrikke protocolforasinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialinvestigatingvolarplatingversusconservativetreatmentofunstabledistalradiusfracturesinpatientsolderthan65years