Cargando…

Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review

BACKGROUND: Stringent requirements exist regarding the transparency of the study selection process and the reliability of results. A 2-step selection process is generally recommended; this is conducted by 2 reviewers independently of each other (conventional double-screening). However, the approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Waffenschmidt, Siw, Knelangen, Marco, Sieben, Wiebke, Bühn, Stefanie, Pieper, Dawid
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31253092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0782-0

Ejemplares similares

Increasing the efficiency of study selection for systematic reviews using prioritization tools and a single-screening approach
por: Waffenschmidt, Siw, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effective study selection using text mining or a single-screening approach: a study protocol
por: Waffenschmidt, Siw, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Benefits and harms of screening for and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: a systematic review
por: Angelescu, Konstanze, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Screening for sickle cell disease in newborns: a systematic review
por: Runkel, Britta, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation
por: Prediger, Barbara, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies
por: Hammel, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study
por: Goossen, Käthe, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

(Update of a) systematic review on the impact of elective early term (< 39th gestational week) caesarean sections on maternal and neonatal health - a protocol
por: Prediger, Barbara, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance
por: Büchter, Roland Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews
por: Affengruber, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations – a review of methodological guidance
por: Weise, Alina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A systematic review and time-response meta-analysis of the optimal timing of elective caesarean sections for best maternal and neonatal health outcomes
por: Prediger, Barbara, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Doni, Katharina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The role of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Becker, Monika, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
por: Rethlefsen, Melissa L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews(*)
por: Rethlefsen, Melissa L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

AnImPaLLO – onkologische Patientenleitlinien im Fokus
por: Meyer, Nora, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Adherence influencing factors – a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Preference between medical outcomes and travel times: an analysis of liver transplantation
por: Burkamp, Jasper Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Morche, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Where to prospectively register a systematic review
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Methodological Quality of PROMs in Psychosocial Consequences of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
por: Gram, Emma Grundtvig, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Usefulness of machine learning softwares to screen titles of systematic reviews: a methodological study
por: dos Reis, Ana Helena Salles, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews: protocol for a systematic methodological review
por: Gutierrez-Arias, Ruvistay, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Systematic Reviews of Animal Models: Methodology versus Epistemology
por: Greek, Ray, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A systematic review of the impact of center volume in dialysis
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Titles versus titles and abstracts for initial screening of articles for systematic reviews
por: Mateen, Farrah J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization in Norwood procedure
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Anticholinergic Burden and Fractures: A Systematic Review with Methodological Appraisal
por: Reinold, Jonas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Is reusing text from a protocol in the completed systematic review acceptable?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Guideline-based quality indicators—a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines: protocol for a systematic review
por: Becker, Monika, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Routine development of objectively derived search strategies
por: Hausner, Elke, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for RhD-negative pregnant women: a systematic review
por: Runkel, Britta, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_2a59s67um2kj6ovstbf80uvciv