Cargando…

Mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of a stemless prosthesis in shoulder arthroplasty represents a novel design whereby the proximal humerus is restored anatomically, while leaving the diaphysis of the humerus untouched. The aim of this study was to present the mid-term results of total evolutive shoulder s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bülhoff, Matthias, Spranz, David, Maier, Michael, Raiss, Patric, Bruckner, Thomas, Zeifang, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.011
_version_ 1783430958098153472
author Bülhoff, Matthias
Spranz, David
Maier, Michael
Raiss, Patric
Bruckner, Thomas
Zeifang, Felix
author_facet Bülhoff, Matthias
Spranz, David
Maier, Michael
Raiss, Patric
Bruckner, Thomas
Zeifang, Felix
author_sort Bülhoff, Matthias
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The introduction of a stemless prosthesis in shoulder arthroplasty represents a novel design whereby the proximal humerus is restored anatomically, while leaving the diaphysis of the humerus untouched. The aim of this study was to present the mid-term results of total evolutive shoulder system (TESS; Biomet(®)), a stemless shoulder prosthesis. METHODS: The study included 38 consecutive patients (18 men and 20 women; mean age: 66 years; range: 55-81 years) treated with shoulder arthroplasty between 2009 and 2011 with TESS for primary glenohumeral arthritis. Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) was performed in 28 cases (74%), hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) in 10 (26%). Constant score, active range of motion, patient satisfaction rate, and radiological assessment were analyzed. Mean time of follow-up was 37 months. RESULTS: Constant score improved from 21.8 points (28.6 adjusted for age) preoperatively to 74.1 points (86.6 adjusted for age) postoperatively. Active range of motion increased significantly from the pre- to postoperative status. Eighty-nine percent were very satisfied or satisfied with shoulder replacement surgery. One cemented glenoid was revised due to aseptic loosening. None of the components were found to be loose at the final follow-up. No signs of stress shielding were seen. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows promising results of this implant concept in the short- to mid-term. These results are comparable with the results achieved with long-established arthroplasty designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65994162019-07-12 Mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis Bülhoff, Matthias Spranz, David Maier, Michael Raiss, Patric Bruckner, Thomas Zeifang, Felix Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Research Article OBJECTIVE: The introduction of a stemless prosthesis in shoulder arthroplasty represents a novel design whereby the proximal humerus is restored anatomically, while leaving the diaphysis of the humerus untouched. The aim of this study was to present the mid-term results of total evolutive shoulder system (TESS; Biomet(®)), a stemless shoulder prosthesis. METHODS: The study included 38 consecutive patients (18 men and 20 women; mean age: 66 years; range: 55-81 years) treated with shoulder arthroplasty between 2009 and 2011 with TESS for primary glenohumeral arthritis. Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) was performed in 28 cases (74%), hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) in 10 (26%). Constant score, active range of motion, patient satisfaction rate, and radiological assessment were analyzed. Mean time of follow-up was 37 months. RESULTS: Constant score improved from 21.8 points (28.6 adjusted for age) preoperatively to 74.1 points (86.6 adjusted for age) postoperatively. Active range of motion increased significantly from the pre- to postoperative status. Eighty-nine percent were very satisfied or satisfied with shoulder replacement surgery. One cemented glenoid was revised due to aseptic loosening. None of the components were found to be loose at the final follow-up. No signs of stress shielding were seen. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows promising results of this implant concept in the short- to mid-term. These results are comparable with the results achieved with long-established arthroplasty designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study. Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2019-05 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6599416/ /pubmed/30956025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.011 Text en © 2019 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Bülhoff, Matthias
Spranz, David
Maier, Michael
Raiss, Patric
Bruckner, Thomas
Zeifang, Felix
Mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis
title Mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis
title_full Mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis
title_short Mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis
title_sort mid-term results with an anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis in patients with primary osteoarthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.011
work_keys_str_mv AT bulhoffmatthias midtermresultswithananatomicstemlessshoulderprosthesisinpatientswithprimaryosteoarthritis
AT spranzdavid midtermresultswithananatomicstemlessshoulderprosthesisinpatientswithprimaryosteoarthritis
AT maiermichael midtermresultswithananatomicstemlessshoulderprosthesisinpatientswithprimaryosteoarthritis
AT raisspatric midtermresultswithananatomicstemlessshoulderprosthesisinpatientswithprimaryosteoarthritis
AT brucknerthomas midtermresultswithananatomicstemlessshoulderprosthesisinpatientswithprimaryosteoarthritis
AT zeifangfelix midtermresultswithananatomicstemlessshoulderprosthesisinpatientswithprimaryosteoarthritis