Cargando…

Sex Differences in Depression as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Depression is an important risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but little is known about the mechanisms of this association. Given sex differences in both AD and depression, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether there are sex di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Underwood, Emily A, Davidson, Heather P, Azam, Amber B, Tierney, Mary C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31276050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz015
_version_ 1783430960511975424
author Underwood, Emily A
Davidson, Heather P
Azam, Amber B
Tierney, Mary C
author_facet Underwood, Emily A
Davidson, Heather P
Azam, Amber B
Tierney, Mary C
author_sort Underwood, Emily A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Depression is an important risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but little is known about the mechanisms of this association. Given sex differences in both AD and depression, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether there are sex differences in their association, as this may improve understanding of underlying mechanisms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Reviews were searched for observational studies including both sexes and examining the association between history of depression and AD. RESULTS: Forty studies, including 62,729 women and 47,342 men, were identified. Meta-analysis was not possible because only 3 studies provided sufficient data. Seven studies provided information about the influence of sex for a qualitative synthesis. Two found an association in men only, 2 in women only, and 3 reported no sex differences. The 2 studies finding an association in women only were unique in that they had the shortest follow-up periods, and were the only clinic-based studies. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings of our systematic review show that there are important methodological differences among the few studies providing data on the influence of sex on depression as a risk factor for AD. Had all 40 studies provided sex-segregated data, these methodological differences and their impact on sex effects could have been examined quantitatively. We encourage researchers to report these data, as well as potential moderating factors, so that the role of sex differences can be better understood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65994262019-07-03 Sex Differences in Depression as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review Underwood, Emily A Davidson, Heather P Azam, Amber B Tierney, Mary C Innov Aging Scholarly Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Depression is an important risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but little is known about the mechanisms of this association. Given sex differences in both AD and depression, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether there are sex differences in their association, as this may improve understanding of underlying mechanisms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Reviews were searched for observational studies including both sexes and examining the association between history of depression and AD. RESULTS: Forty studies, including 62,729 women and 47,342 men, were identified. Meta-analysis was not possible because only 3 studies provided sufficient data. Seven studies provided information about the influence of sex for a qualitative synthesis. Two found an association in men only, 2 in women only, and 3 reported no sex differences. The 2 studies finding an association in women only were unique in that they had the shortest follow-up periods, and were the only clinic-based studies. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings of our systematic review show that there are important methodological differences among the few studies providing data on the influence of sex on depression as a risk factor for AD. Had all 40 studies provided sex-segregated data, these methodological differences and their impact on sex effects could have been examined quantitatively. We encourage researchers to report these data, as well as potential moderating factors, so that the role of sex differences can be better understood. Oxford University Press 2019-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6599426/ /pubmed/31276050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz015 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Scholarly Review
Underwood, Emily A
Davidson, Heather P
Azam, Amber B
Tierney, Mary C
Sex Differences in Depression as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review
title Sex Differences in Depression as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full Sex Differences in Depression as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Sex Differences in Depression as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences in Depression as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review
title_short Sex Differences in Depression as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review
title_sort sex differences in depression as a risk factor for alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
topic Scholarly Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31276050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz015
work_keys_str_mv AT underwoodemilya sexdifferencesindepressionasariskfactorforalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview
AT davidsonheatherp sexdifferencesindepressionasariskfactorforalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview
AT azamamberb sexdifferencesindepressionasariskfactorforalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview
AT tierneymaryc sexdifferencesindepressionasariskfactorforalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview