Cargando…
Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study
PURPOSE: Professionalism is one of the most fundamental elements in judgment and moral reasoning and also an essential skill accompanied by other technical and scientific skills in the medical staff. Awareness of ethical aspects involves the clinical decision-making for patients. Therefore, this stu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297003 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S183690 |
_version_ | 1783430964277411840 |
---|---|
author | Kamali, Farahnaz Yousefy, Alireza Yamani, Nikoo |
author_facet | Kamali, Farahnaz Yousefy, Alireza Yamani, Nikoo |
author_sort | Kamali, Farahnaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Professionalism is one of the most fundamental elements in judgment and moral reasoning and also an essential skill accompanied by other technical and scientific skills in the medical staff. Awareness of ethical aspects involves the clinical decision-making for patients. Therefore, this study aimed at explaining the role of professionalism in moral reasoning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted on 17 faculty members and clinical students of medicine department. The participants were selected through purposive sampling method, and the data were collected via semistructured interviews after getting informed consent. Then, data were analyzed using conventional content analysis method. RESULTS: Three main categories and eleven subcategories were classified as follows: professionalism principles with four subscales such as communication with patients, trust building, satisfying the patients, and moralism; professional responsibility with four subscales such as fulfillment of duties, commitment to professional rules, maintaining professional position, and dignity of the patient; professional evidence with three subscales based on data analysis such as patient’s participation in decision-making, personal and other’s experiences, and professional knowledge. CONCLUSION: Training qualified people in medicine is one of the important missions of the professors. Improving the professionalism in students enables them in moral reasoning. Training professional principles, responsibility, and using professional evidence are the strategies used for job commitment in moral reasoning, and emphasis on how to train medical ethics will support graduates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6599444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65994442019-07-11 Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study Kamali, Farahnaz Yousefy, Alireza Yamani, Nikoo Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research PURPOSE: Professionalism is one of the most fundamental elements in judgment and moral reasoning and also an essential skill accompanied by other technical and scientific skills in the medical staff. Awareness of ethical aspects involves the clinical decision-making for patients. Therefore, this study aimed at explaining the role of professionalism in moral reasoning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted on 17 faculty members and clinical students of medicine department. The participants were selected through purposive sampling method, and the data were collected via semistructured interviews after getting informed consent. Then, data were analyzed using conventional content analysis method. RESULTS: Three main categories and eleven subcategories were classified as follows: professionalism principles with four subscales such as communication with patients, trust building, satisfying the patients, and moralism; professional responsibility with four subscales such as fulfillment of duties, commitment to professional rules, maintaining professional position, and dignity of the patient; professional evidence with three subscales based on data analysis such as patient’s participation in decision-making, personal and other’s experiences, and professional knowledge. CONCLUSION: Training qualified people in medicine is one of the important missions of the professors. Improving the professionalism in students enables them in moral reasoning. Training professional principles, responsibility, and using professional evidence are the strategies used for job commitment in moral reasoning, and emphasis on how to train medical ethics will support graduates. Dove Medical Press 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6599444/ /pubmed/31297003 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S183690 Text en © 2019 Kamali et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kamali, Farahnaz Yousefy, Alireza Yamani, Nikoo Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study |
title | Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study |
title_full | Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study |
title_short | Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study |
title_sort | explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297003 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S183690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamalifarahnaz explainingprofessionalisminmoralreasoningaqualitativestudy AT yousefyalireza explainingprofessionalisminmoralreasoningaqualitativestudy AT yamaninikoo explainingprofessionalisminmoralreasoningaqualitativestudy |