Cargando…

Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can be complicated with a complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. The cost of index hospitalization for such patients is higher than usual. However, the magnitude of this increased cost is uncertain. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Mansoor, Patel, Jay N, Loc, Brian L, Vipparthy, Sharath C, Divecha, Chirag, Barzallo, Pablo X, Kim, Minchul, Baman, Timir, Barzallo, Marco, Mungee, Sudhir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31281768
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5005
_version_ 1783430967574134784
author Ahmad, Mansoor
Patel, Jay N
Loc, Brian L
Vipparthy, Sharath C
Divecha, Chirag
Barzallo, Pablo X
Kim, Minchul
Baman, Timir
Barzallo, Marco
Mungee, Sudhir
author_facet Ahmad, Mansoor
Patel, Jay N
Loc, Brian L
Vipparthy, Sharath C
Divecha, Chirag
Barzallo, Pablo X
Kim, Minchul
Baman, Timir
Barzallo, Marco
Mungee, Sudhir
author_sort Ahmad, Mansoor
collection PubMed
description Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can be complicated with a complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. The cost of index hospitalization for such patients is higher than usual. However, the magnitude of this increased cost is uncertain. We have looked at our five-year TAVR experience to analyze the detailed cost for PPM implantation in TAVR. Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TAVR at our tertiary care center from December 2012 to April 2018. The initial sample size was 449. We excluded patients with prior PPM or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (37). Patients who had their procedure aborted or required a cardiopulmonary bypass (16) and those with missing data variables (14) were excluded. The final sample size was 382. The cost for admission was calculated as the US dollars incurred by the hospital. Cohort costs were categorized as a direct cost, which is patient based, and an indirect cost, which represents overhead costs and is independent of patient volume. Patients were divided into two groups based on the placement of PPM after TAVR. Chi-square test, t-test, and logistic linear regression were used for the statistical analysis. Results Of 382 patients, 19 (4.9%) required PPM after TAVR. Baseline variables, including age, gender, and BMI, were not statistically significant. The PPM group had a significantly longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay (48.6 hours vs. 36.7 hours; p<0.001) and total stay in the hospital (4.2 days vs. 3.4 days; p=0.047). PPM implantation after TAVR increased cost on an average of $10,213 more than a typical TAVR admission (p=0.04). The direct cost was also significantly high for the PPM group ($7,087; p=0.02). On detailed analysis, almost all major cost categories showed a higher cost for pacemaker patients when compared with control. Conclusions PPM implantation adds a significant cost burden to TAVR admissions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65994642019-07-06 Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis Ahmad, Mansoor Patel, Jay N Loc, Brian L Vipparthy, Sharath C Divecha, Chirag Barzallo, Pablo X Kim, Minchul Baman, Timir Barzallo, Marco Mungee, Sudhir Cureus Cardiology Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can be complicated with a complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. The cost of index hospitalization for such patients is higher than usual. However, the magnitude of this increased cost is uncertain. We have looked at our five-year TAVR experience to analyze the detailed cost for PPM implantation in TAVR. Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TAVR at our tertiary care center from December 2012 to April 2018. The initial sample size was 449. We excluded patients with prior PPM or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (37). Patients who had their procedure aborted or required a cardiopulmonary bypass (16) and those with missing data variables (14) were excluded. The final sample size was 382. The cost for admission was calculated as the US dollars incurred by the hospital. Cohort costs were categorized as a direct cost, which is patient based, and an indirect cost, which represents overhead costs and is independent of patient volume. Patients were divided into two groups based on the placement of PPM after TAVR. Chi-square test, t-test, and logistic linear regression were used for the statistical analysis. Results Of 382 patients, 19 (4.9%) required PPM after TAVR. Baseline variables, including age, gender, and BMI, were not statistically significant. The PPM group had a significantly longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay (48.6 hours vs. 36.7 hours; p<0.001) and total stay in the hospital (4.2 days vs. 3.4 days; p=0.047). PPM implantation after TAVR increased cost on an average of $10,213 more than a typical TAVR admission (p=0.04). The direct cost was also significantly high for the PPM group ($7,087; p=0.02). On detailed analysis, almost all major cost categories showed a higher cost for pacemaker patients when compared with control. Conclusions PPM implantation adds a significant cost burden to TAVR admissions. Cureus 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6599464/ /pubmed/31281768 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5005 Text en Copyright © 2019, Ahmad et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Ahmad, Mansoor
Patel, Jay N
Loc, Brian L
Vipparthy, Sharath C
Divecha, Chirag
Barzallo, Pablo X
Kim, Minchul
Baman, Timir
Barzallo, Marco
Mungee, Sudhir
Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis
title Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis
title_full Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis
title_fullStr Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis
title_short Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis
title_sort permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a cost analysis
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31281768
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5005
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadmansoor permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT pateljayn permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT locbrianl permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT vipparthysharathc permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT divechachirag permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT barzallopablox permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT kimminchul permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT bamantimir permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT barzallomarco permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis
AT mungeesudhir permanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacostanalysis