Cargando…
Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population
Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30924051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5 |
_version_ | 1783430970902315008 |
---|---|
author | Amin, Alpesh Keshishian, Allison Dina, Oluwaseyi Dhamane, Amol Nadkarni, Anagha Carda, Eric Russ, Cristina Rosenblatt, Lisa Mardekian, Jack Yuce, Huseyin Baker, Christine L. |
author_facet | Amin, Alpesh Keshishian, Allison Dina, Oluwaseyi Dhamane, Amol Nadkarni, Anagha Carda, Eric Russ, Cristina Rosenblatt, Lisa Mardekian, Jack Yuce, Huseyin Baker, Christine L. |
author_sort | Amin, Alpesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin. NVAF patients aged ≥ 65 years who initiated DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin were selected from 01JAN2013-31DEC2015 in CMS Medicare data. Propensity score matching was used to balance DOAC and warfarin cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of stroke/SE, MB, NCO, and MACE. 37,525 apixaban–warfarin, 18,131 dabigatran–warfarin, and 55,359 rivaroxaban–warfarin pairs were included. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.59–0.81) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.91) had lower risk of stroke/SE, and dabigatran (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07) had similar risk of stroke/SE. Apixaban (MB: HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.57–0.67; NCO: HR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.60–0.69) and dabigatran (MB: HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71–0.89; NCO: HR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.76–0.93) had lower risk of MB and NCO, and rivaroxaban had higher risk of MB (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.02–1.14) and similar risk of NCO (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.99–1.09). Compared to warfarin, apixaban had a lower risk for stroke/SE, MB, and NCO; dabigatran had a lower risk of MB and NCO; and rivaroxaban had a lower risk of stroke/SE but higher risk of MB. All DOACs had lower risk of MACE compared to warfarin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6599494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65994942019-07-18 Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population Amin, Alpesh Keshishian, Allison Dina, Oluwaseyi Dhamane, Amol Nadkarni, Anagha Carda, Eric Russ, Cristina Rosenblatt, Lisa Mardekian, Jack Yuce, Huseyin Baker, Christine L. J Thromb Thrombolysis Article Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin. NVAF patients aged ≥ 65 years who initiated DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin were selected from 01JAN2013-31DEC2015 in CMS Medicare data. Propensity score matching was used to balance DOAC and warfarin cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of stroke/SE, MB, NCO, and MACE. 37,525 apixaban–warfarin, 18,131 dabigatran–warfarin, and 55,359 rivaroxaban–warfarin pairs were included. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.59–0.81) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.91) had lower risk of stroke/SE, and dabigatran (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07) had similar risk of stroke/SE. Apixaban (MB: HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.57–0.67; NCO: HR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.60–0.69) and dabigatran (MB: HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71–0.89; NCO: HR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.76–0.93) had lower risk of MB and NCO, and rivaroxaban had higher risk of MB (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.02–1.14) and similar risk of NCO (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.99–1.09). Compared to warfarin, apixaban had a lower risk for stroke/SE, MB, and NCO; dabigatran had a lower risk of MB and NCO; and rivaroxaban had a lower risk of stroke/SE but higher risk of MB. All DOACs had lower risk of MACE compared to warfarin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-03-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6599494/ /pubmed/30924051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Amin, Alpesh Keshishian, Allison Dina, Oluwaseyi Dhamane, Amol Nadkarni, Anagha Carda, Eric Russ, Cristina Rosenblatt, Lisa Mardekian, Jack Yuce, Huseyin Baker, Christine L. Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population |
title | Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population |
title_full | Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population |
title_fullStr | Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population |
title_short | Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population |
title_sort | comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the cms medicare population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30924051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aminalpesh comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT keshishianallison comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT dinaoluwaseyi comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT dhamaneamol comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT nadkarnianagha comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT cardaeric comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT russcristina comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT rosenblattlisa comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT mardekianjack comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT yucehuseyin comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation AT bakerchristinel comparativeclinicaloutcomesbetweendirectoralanticoagulantsandwarfarinamongelderlypatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationinthecmsmedicarepopulation |