Cargando…

Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review

Women underrepresentation in science has frequently been associated with women being less productive than men (i.e. the gender productivity gap), which may be explained by women having lower success rates, producing science of lower impact and/or suffering gender bias. By performing global meta-anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astegiano, Julia, Sebastián-González, Esther, Castanho, Camila de Toledo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181566
_version_ 1783430995878346752
author Astegiano, Julia
Sebastián-González, Esther
Castanho, Camila de Toledo
author_facet Astegiano, Julia
Sebastián-González, Esther
Castanho, Camila de Toledo
author_sort Astegiano, Julia
collection PubMed
description Women underrepresentation in science has frequently been associated with women being less productive than men (i.e. the gender productivity gap), which may be explained by women having lower success rates, producing science of lower impact and/or suffering gender bias. By performing global meta-analyses, we show that there is a gender productivity gap mostly supported by a larger scientific production ascribed to men. However, women and men show similar success rates when the researchers' work is directly evaluated (i.e. publishing articles). Men's success rate is higher only in productivity proxies involving peer recognition (e.g. evaluation committees, academic positions). Men's articles showed a tendency to have higher global impact but only if studies include self-citations. We detected gender bias against women in research fields where women are underrepresented (i.e. those different from Psychology). Historical numerical unbalance, socio-psychological aspects and cultural factors may influence differences in success rate, science impact and gender bias. Thus, the maintenance of a women-unfriendly academic and non-academic environment may perpetuate the gender productivity gap. New policies to build a more egalitarian and heterogeneous scientific community and society are needed to close the gender gap in science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65997892019-07-16 Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review Astegiano, Julia Sebastián-González, Esther Castanho, Camila de Toledo R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Women underrepresentation in science has frequently been associated with women being less productive than men (i.e. the gender productivity gap), which may be explained by women having lower success rates, producing science of lower impact and/or suffering gender bias. By performing global meta-analyses, we show that there is a gender productivity gap mostly supported by a larger scientific production ascribed to men. However, women and men show similar success rates when the researchers' work is directly evaluated (i.e. publishing articles). Men's success rate is higher only in productivity proxies involving peer recognition (e.g. evaluation committees, academic positions). Men's articles showed a tendency to have higher global impact but only if studies include self-citations. We detected gender bias against women in research fields where women are underrepresented (i.e. those different from Psychology). Historical numerical unbalance, socio-psychological aspects and cultural factors may influence differences in success rate, science impact and gender bias. Thus, the maintenance of a women-unfriendly academic and non-academic environment may perpetuate the gender productivity gap. New policies to build a more egalitarian and heterogeneous scientific community and society are needed to close the gender gap in science. The Royal Society 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6599789/ /pubmed/31312468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181566 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Astegiano, Julia
Sebastián-González, Esther
Castanho, Camila de Toledo
Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
title Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
title_full Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
title_fullStr Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
title_full_unstemmed Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
title_short Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
title_sort unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181566
work_keys_str_mv AT astegianojulia unravellingthegenderproductivitygapinscienceametaanalyticalreview
AT sebastiangonzalezesther unravellingthegenderproductivitygapinscienceametaanalyticalreview
AT castanhocamiladetoledo unravellingthegenderproductivitygapinscienceametaanalyticalreview