Cargando…

Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study

Determining how best to manage an infectious disease outbreak may be hindered by both epidemiological uncertainty (i.e. about epidemiological processes) and operational uncertainty (i.e. about the effectiveness of candidate interventions). However, these two uncertainties are rarely addressed concur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shou-Li, Ferrari, Matthew J., Bjørnstad, Ottar N., Runge, Michael C., Fonnesbeck, Christopher J., Tildesley, Michael J., Pannell, David, Shea, Katriona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0774
_version_ 1783431026736889856
author Li, Shou-Li
Ferrari, Matthew J.
Bjørnstad, Ottar N.
Runge, Michael C.
Fonnesbeck, Christopher J.
Tildesley, Michael J.
Pannell, David
Shea, Katriona
author_facet Li, Shou-Li
Ferrari, Matthew J.
Bjørnstad, Ottar N.
Runge, Michael C.
Fonnesbeck, Christopher J.
Tildesley, Michael J.
Pannell, David
Shea, Katriona
author_sort Li, Shou-Li
collection PubMed
description Determining how best to manage an infectious disease outbreak may be hindered by both epidemiological uncertainty (i.e. about epidemiological processes) and operational uncertainty (i.e. about the effectiveness of candidate interventions). However, these two uncertainties are rarely addressed concurrently in epidemic studies. We present an approach to simultaneously address both sources of uncertainty, to elucidate which source most impedes decision-making. In the case of the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak, epidemiological uncertainty is represented by a large ensemble of published models. Operational uncertainty about three classes of interventions is assessed for a wide range of potential intervention effectiveness. We ranked each intervention by caseload reduction in each model, initially assuming an unlimited budget as a counterfactual. We then assessed the influence of three candidate cost functions relating intervention effectiveness and cost for different budget levels. The improvement in management outcomes to be gained by resolving uncertainty is generally high in this study; appropriate information gain could reduce expected caseload by more than 50%. The ranking of interventions is jointly determined by the underlying epidemiological process, the effectiveness of the interventions and the size of the budget. An epidemiologically effective intervention might not be optimal if its costs outweigh its epidemiological benefit. Under higher-budget conditions, resolution of epidemiological uncertainty is most valuable. When budgets are tight, however, operational and epidemiological uncertainty are equally important. Overall, our study demonstrates that significant reductions in caseload could result from a careful examination of both epidemiological and operational uncertainties within the same modelling structure. This approach can be applied to decision-making for the management of other diseases for which multiple models and multiple interventions are available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6599986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65999862019-07-01 Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study Li, Shou-Li Ferrari, Matthew J. Bjørnstad, Ottar N. Runge, Michael C. Fonnesbeck, Christopher J. Tildesley, Michael J. Pannell, David Shea, Katriona Proc Biol Sci Ecology Determining how best to manage an infectious disease outbreak may be hindered by both epidemiological uncertainty (i.e. about epidemiological processes) and operational uncertainty (i.e. about the effectiveness of candidate interventions). However, these two uncertainties are rarely addressed concurrently in epidemic studies. We present an approach to simultaneously address both sources of uncertainty, to elucidate which source most impedes decision-making. In the case of the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak, epidemiological uncertainty is represented by a large ensemble of published models. Operational uncertainty about three classes of interventions is assessed for a wide range of potential intervention effectiveness. We ranked each intervention by caseload reduction in each model, initially assuming an unlimited budget as a counterfactual. We then assessed the influence of three candidate cost functions relating intervention effectiveness and cost for different budget levels. The improvement in management outcomes to be gained by resolving uncertainty is generally high in this study; appropriate information gain could reduce expected caseload by more than 50%. The ranking of interventions is jointly determined by the underlying epidemiological process, the effectiveness of the interventions and the size of the budget. An epidemiologically effective intervention might not be optimal if its costs outweigh its epidemiological benefit. Under higher-budget conditions, resolution of epidemiological uncertainty is most valuable. When budgets are tight, however, operational and epidemiological uncertainty are equally important. Overall, our study demonstrates that significant reductions in caseload could result from a careful examination of both epidemiological and operational uncertainties within the same modelling structure. This approach can be applied to decision-making for the management of other diseases for which multiple models and multiple interventions are available. The Royal Society 2019-06-26 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6599986/ /pubmed/31213182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0774 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Li, Shou-Li
Ferrari, Matthew J.
Bjørnstad, Ottar N.
Runge, Michael C.
Fonnesbeck, Christopher J.
Tildesley, Michael J.
Pannell, David
Shea, Katriona
Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study
title Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study
title_full Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study
title_fullStr Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study
title_short Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study
title_sort concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: ebola as a case study
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0774
work_keys_str_mv AT lishouli concurrentassessmentofepidemiologicalandoperationaluncertaintiesforoptimaloutbreakcontrolebolaasacasestudy
AT ferrarimatthewj concurrentassessmentofepidemiologicalandoperationaluncertaintiesforoptimaloutbreakcontrolebolaasacasestudy
AT bjørnstadottarn concurrentassessmentofepidemiologicalandoperationaluncertaintiesforoptimaloutbreakcontrolebolaasacasestudy
AT rungemichaelc concurrentassessmentofepidemiologicalandoperationaluncertaintiesforoptimaloutbreakcontrolebolaasacasestudy
AT fonnesbeckchristopherj concurrentassessmentofepidemiologicalandoperationaluncertaintiesforoptimaloutbreakcontrolebolaasacasestudy
AT tildesleymichaelj concurrentassessmentofepidemiologicalandoperationaluncertaintiesforoptimaloutbreakcontrolebolaasacasestudy
AT pannelldavid concurrentassessmentofepidemiologicalandoperationaluncertaintiesforoptimaloutbreakcontrolebolaasacasestudy
AT sheakatriona concurrentassessmentofepidemiologicalandoperationaluncertaintiesforoptimaloutbreakcontrolebolaasacasestudy