Cargando…

Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study

Objectives: To assess the safety and the effectiveness of bipolar energy in the transurethral resection of primary large bladder tumours (TURBT) and compare it to conventional monopolar energy. Patients and methods: From November 2015 to June 2017, 80 patients underwent endoscopic resection primaril...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmoud, Mahmoud A., Tawfick, Ahmed, Mostafa, Diaa Eldin, Elawady, Hossam, Abuelnaga, Mohamed, Omar, Karim, Elshawaf, Hisham, Hasan, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6600073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590517
_version_ 1783431041735720960
author Mahmoud, Mahmoud A.
Tawfick, Ahmed
Mostafa, Diaa Eldin
Elawady, Hossam
Abuelnaga, Mohamed
Omar, Karim
Elshawaf, Hisham
Hasan, Mohamed
author_facet Mahmoud, Mahmoud A.
Tawfick, Ahmed
Mostafa, Diaa Eldin
Elawady, Hossam
Abuelnaga, Mohamed
Omar, Karim
Elshawaf, Hisham
Hasan, Mohamed
author_sort Mahmoud, Mahmoud A.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To assess the safety and the effectiveness of bipolar energy in the transurethral resection of primary large bladder tumours (TURBT) and compare it to conventional monopolar energy. Patients and methods: From November 2015 to June 2017, 80 patients underwent endoscopic resection primarily for large bladder cancer tumours of >3 cm. They were randomly assigned into two groups: 40 patients underwent a TURBT with conventional monopolar current (M-TURBT) and 40 were treated with bipolar current (B-TURBT). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for the patients’ demographic and tumour characteristics. There was a significant difference between M-TURBT and B-TURBT for resection time, obturator reflex, hospital stay, and catheterisation time, which were all higher in the M-TURBT group; the mean (SD) resection time was 26.45 (5.73) vs 22.85 (7.52) min (P = 0.048), the obturator reflex was 25% vs 5% (P = 0.025), the median hospital stay and catheterisation times were 2 vs 1 day (P = 0.012 and P = 0.023, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups for bladder perforation, TUR syndrome, drop in haemoglobin level, and blood transfusion rate. However, there was statically significant difference in the postoperative haematuria rate, which was higher in the M-TURBT group, at 24 patients vs eight in the B-TURBT group (60% vs 20%; P = 0.01). After 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the groups. Conclusion: B-TURBT is a safe and effective alternative procedure to M-TURBT for the management of primary large bladder tumours of >3 cm. Abbreviations: CONSORT: consolidated standards of reporting Trials; Hb: haemoglobin; NMIBC: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; TUR: transurethral resection; (B-)(M-)TURBT: (bipolar) (monopolar) transurethral resection of bladder tumour
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6600073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66000732019-07-08 Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study Mahmoud, Mahmoud A. Tawfick, Ahmed Mostafa, Diaa Eldin Elawady, Hossam Abuelnaga, Mohamed Omar, Karim Elshawaf, Hisham Hasan, Mohamed Arab J Urol Oncology/Reconstruction Objectives: To assess the safety and the effectiveness of bipolar energy in the transurethral resection of primary large bladder tumours (TURBT) and compare it to conventional monopolar energy. Patients and methods: From November 2015 to June 2017, 80 patients underwent endoscopic resection primarily for large bladder cancer tumours of >3 cm. They were randomly assigned into two groups: 40 patients underwent a TURBT with conventional monopolar current (M-TURBT) and 40 were treated with bipolar current (B-TURBT). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for the patients’ demographic and tumour characteristics. There was a significant difference between M-TURBT and B-TURBT for resection time, obturator reflex, hospital stay, and catheterisation time, which were all higher in the M-TURBT group; the mean (SD) resection time was 26.45 (5.73) vs 22.85 (7.52) min (P = 0.048), the obturator reflex was 25% vs 5% (P = 0.025), the median hospital stay and catheterisation times were 2 vs 1 day (P = 0.012 and P = 0.023, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups for bladder perforation, TUR syndrome, drop in haemoglobin level, and blood transfusion rate. However, there was statically significant difference in the postoperative haematuria rate, which was higher in the M-TURBT group, at 24 patients vs eight in the B-TURBT group (60% vs 20%; P = 0.01). After 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the groups. Conclusion: B-TURBT is a safe and effective alternative procedure to M-TURBT for the management of primary large bladder tumours of >3 cm. Abbreviations: CONSORT: consolidated standards of reporting Trials; Hb: haemoglobin; NMIBC: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; TUR: transurethral resection; (B-)(M-)TURBT: (bipolar) (monopolar) transurethral resection of bladder tumour Taylor & Francis 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6600073/ /pubmed/31285924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590517 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology/Reconstruction
Mahmoud, Mahmoud A.
Tawfick, Ahmed
Mostafa, Diaa Eldin
Elawady, Hossam
Abuelnaga, Mohamed
Omar, Karim
Elshawaf, Hisham
Hasan, Mohamed
Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study
title Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study
title_full Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study
title_fullStr Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study
title_short Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study
title_sort can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? a prospective randomised study
topic Oncology/Reconstruction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6600073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590517
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudmahmouda canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT tawfickahmed canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT mostafadiaaeldin canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT elawadyhossam canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT abuelnagamohamed canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT omarkarim canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT elshawafhisham canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT hasanmohamed canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy