Cargando…
Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study
Objectives: To assess the safety and the effectiveness of bipolar energy in the transurethral resection of primary large bladder tumours (TURBT) and compare it to conventional monopolar energy. Patients and methods: From November 2015 to June 2017, 80 patients underwent endoscopic resection primaril...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6600073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590517 |
_version_ | 1783431041735720960 |
---|---|
author | Mahmoud, Mahmoud A. Tawfick, Ahmed Mostafa, Diaa Eldin Elawady, Hossam Abuelnaga, Mohamed Omar, Karim Elshawaf, Hisham Hasan, Mohamed |
author_facet | Mahmoud, Mahmoud A. Tawfick, Ahmed Mostafa, Diaa Eldin Elawady, Hossam Abuelnaga, Mohamed Omar, Karim Elshawaf, Hisham Hasan, Mohamed |
author_sort | Mahmoud, Mahmoud A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: To assess the safety and the effectiveness of bipolar energy in the transurethral resection of primary large bladder tumours (TURBT) and compare it to conventional monopolar energy. Patients and methods: From November 2015 to June 2017, 80 patients underwent endoscopic resection primarily for large bladder cancer tumours of >3 cm. They were randomly assigned into two groups: 40 patients underwent a TURBT with conventional monopolar current (M-TURBT) and 40 were treated with bipolar current (B-TURBT). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for the patients’ demographic and tumour characteristics. There was a significant difference between M-TURBT and B-TURBT for resection time, obturator reflex, hospital stay, and catheterisation time, which were all higher in the M-TURBT group; the mean (SD) resection time was 26.45 (5.73) vs 22.85 (7.52) min (P = 0.048), the obturator reflex was 25% vs 5% (P = 0.025), the median hospital stay and catheterisation times were 2 vs 1 day (P = 0.012 and P = 0.023, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups for bladder perforation, TUR syndrome, drop in haemoglobin level, and blood transfusion rate. However, there was statically significant difference in the postoperative haematuria rate, which was higher in the M-TURBT group, at 24 patients vs eight in the B-TURBT group (60% vs 20%; P = 0.01). After 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the groups. Conclusion: B-TURBT is a safe and effective alternative procedure to M-TURBT for the management of primary large bladder tumours of >3 cm. Abbreviations: CONSORT: consolidated standards of reporting Trials; Hb: haemoglobin; NMIBC: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; TUR: transurethral resection; (B-)(M-)TURBT: (bipolar) (monopolar) transurethral resection of bladder tumour |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6600073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66000732019-07-08 Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study Mahmoud, Mahmoud A. Tawfick, Ahmed Mostafa, Diaa Eldin Elawady, Hossam Abuelnaga, Mohamed Omar, Karim Elshawaf, Hisham Hasan, Mohamed Arab J Urol Oncology/Reconstruction Objectives: To assess the safety and the effectiveness of bipolar energy in the transurethral resection of primary large bladder tumours (TURBT) and compare it to conventional monopolar energy. Patients and methods: From November 2015 to June 2017, 80 patients underwent endoscopic resection primarily for large bladder cancer tumours of >3 cm. They were randomly assigned into two groups: 40 patients underwent a TURBT with conventional monopolar current (M-TURBT) and 40 were treated with bipolar current (B-TURBT). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for the patients’ demographic and tumour characteristics. There was a significant difference between M-TURBT and B-TURBT for resection time, obturator reflex, hospital stay, and catheterisation time, which were all higher in the M-TURBT group; the mean (SD) resection time was 26.45 (5.73) vs 22.85 (7.52) min (P = 0.048), the obturator reflex was 25% vs 5% (P = 0.025), the median hospital stay and catheterisation times were 2 vs 1 day (P = 0.012 and P = 0.023, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups for bladder perforation, TUR syndrome, drop in haemoglobin level, and blood transfusion rate. However, there was statically significant difference in the postoperative haematuria rate, which was higher in the M-TURBT group, at 24 patients vs eight in the B-TURBT group (60% vs 20%; P = 0.01). After 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the groups. Conclusion: B-TURBT is a safe and effective alternative procedure to M-TURBT for the management of primary large bladder tumours of >3 cm. Abbreviations: CONSORT: consolidated standards of reporting Trials; Hb: haemoglobin; NMIBC: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; TUR: transurethral resection; (B-)(M-)TURBT: (bipolar) (monopolar) transurethral resection of bladder tumour Taylor & Francis 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6600073/ /pubmed/31285924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590517 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Oncology/Reconstruction Mahmoud, Mahmoud A. Tawfick, Ahmed Mostafa, Diaa Eldin Elawady, Hossam Abuelnaga, Mohamed Omar, Karim Elshawaf, Hisham Hasan, Mohamed Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study |
title | Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study |
title_full | Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study |
title_fullStr | Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study |
title_full_unstemmed | Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study |
title_short | Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study |
title_sort | can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? a prospective randomised study |
topic | Oncology/Reconstruction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6600073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahmoudmahmouda canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT tawfickahmed canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT mostafadiaaeldin canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT elawadyhossam canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT abuelnagamohamed canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT omarkarim canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT elshawafhisham canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT hasanmohamed canbipolarenergyserveasanalternativetomonopolarenergyinthemanagementoflargebladdertumours3cmaprospectiverandomisedstudy |