Cargando…

Automated macrophage counting in DLBCL tissue samples: a ROF filter based approach

BACKGROUND: For analysis of the tumor microenvironment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) tissue samples, it is desirable to obtain information about counts and distribution of different macrophage subtypes. Until now, macrophage counts are mostly inferred from gene expression analysis of whol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Marcus, Hänsel, René, Reinke, Sarah, Richter, Julia, Altenbuchinger, Michael, Braumann, Ulf-Dietrich, Spang, Rainer, Löffler, Markus, Klapper, Wolfram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6600891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0098-9
_version_ 1783431203645292544
author Wagner, Marcus
Hänsel, René
Reinke, Sarah
Richter, Julia
Altenbuchinger, Michael
Braumann, Ulf-Dietrich
Spang, Rainer
Löffler, Markus
Klapper, Wolfram
author_facet Wagner, Marcus
Hänsel, René
Reinke, Sarah
Richter, Julia
Altenbuchinger, Michael
Braumann, Ulf-Dietrich
Spang, Rainer
Löffler, Markus
Klapper, Wolfram
author_sort Wagner, Marcus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For analysis of the tumor microenvironment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) tissue samples, it is desirable to obtain information about counts and distribution of different macrophage subtypes. Until now, macrophage counts are mostly inferred from gene expression analysis of whole tissue sections, providing only indirect information. Direct analysis of immunohistochemically (IHC) fluorescence stained tissue samples is confronted with several difficulties, e.g. high variability of shape and size of target macrophages and strongly inhomogeneous intensity of staining. Consequently, application of commercial software is largely restricted to very rough analysis modes, and most macrophage counts are still obtained by manual counting in microarrays or high power fields, thus failing to represent the heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment adequately. METHODS: We describe a Rudin-Osher-Fatemi (ROF) filter based segmentation approach for whole tissue samples, combining floating intensity thresholding and rule-based feature detection. Method is validated against manual counts and compared with two commercial software kits (Tissue Studio 64, Definiens AG, and Halo, Indica Labs) and a straightforward machine-learning approach in a set of 50 test images. Further, the novel method and both commercial packages are applied to a set of 44 whole tissue sections. Outputs are compared with gene expression data available for the same tissue samples. Finally, the ROF based method is applied to 44 expert-specified tumor subregions for testing selection and subsampling strategies. RESULTS: Among all tested methods, the novel approach is best correlated with manual count (0.9297). Automated detection of evaluation subregions proved to be fully reliable. Comparison with gene expression data obtained for the same tissue samples reveals only moderate to low correlation levels. Subsampling within tumor subregions is possible with results almost identical to full sampling. Mean macrophage size in tumor subregions is 152.5±111.3 μm(2). CONCLUSIONS: ROF based approach is successfully applied to detection of IHC stained macrophages in DLBCL tissue samples. The method competes well with existing commercial software kits. In difference to them, it is fully automated, externally repeatable, independent on training data and completely documented. Comparison with gene expression data indicates that image morphometry constitutes an independent source of information about antibody-polarized macrophage occurence and distribution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12575-019-0098-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6600891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66008912019-07-12 Automated macrophage counting in DLBCL tissue samples: a ROF filter based approach Wagner, Marcus Hänsel, René Reinke, Sarah Richter, Julia Altenbuchinger, Michael Braumann, Ulf-Dietrich Spang, Rainer Löffler, Markus Klapper, Wolfram Biol Proced Online Methodology BACKGROUND: For analysis of the tumor microenvironment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) tissue samples, it is desirable to obtain information about counts and distribution of different macrophage subtypes. Until now, macrophage counts are mostly inferred from gene expression analysis of whole tissue sections, providing only indirect information. Direct analysis of immunohistochemically (IHC) fluorescence stained tissue samples is confronted with several difficulties, e.g. high variability of shape and size of target macrophages and strongly inhomogeneous intensity of staining. Consequently, application of commercial software is largely restricted to very rough analysis modes, and most macrophage counts are still obtained by manual counting in microarrays or high power fields, thus failing to represent the heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment adequately. METHODS: We describe a Rudin-Osher-Fatemi (ROF) filter based segmentation approach for whole tissue samples, combining floating intensity thresholding and rule-based feature detection. Method is validated against manual counts and compared with two commercial software kits (Tissue Studio 64, Definiens AG, and Halo, Indica Labs) and a straightforward machine-learning approach in a set of 50 test images. Further, the novel method and both commercial packages are applied to a set of 44 whole tissue sections. Outputs are compared with gene expression data available for the same tissue samples. Finally, the ROF based method is applied to 44 expert-specified tumor subregions for testing selection and subsampling strategies. RESULTS: Among all tested methods, the novel approach is best correlated with manual count (0.9297). Automated detection of evaluation subregions proved to be fully reliable. Comparison with gene expression data obtained for the same tissue samples reveals only moderate to low correlation levels. Subsampling within tumor subregions is possible with results almost identical to full sampling. Mean macrophage size in tumor subregions is 152.5±111.3 μm(2). CONCLUSIONS: ROF based approach is successfully applied to detection of IHC stained macrophages in DLBCL tissue samples. The method competes well with existing commercial software kits. In difference to them, it is fully automated, externally repeatable, independent on training data and completely documented. Comparison with gene expression data indicates that image morphometry constitutes an independent source of information about antibody-polarized macrophage occurence and distribution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12575-019-0098-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6600891/ /pubmed/31303867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0098-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Wagner, Marcus
Hänsel, René
Reinke, Sarah
Richter, Julia
Altenbuchinger, Michael
Braumann, Ulf-Dietrich
Spang, Rainer
Löffler, Markus
Klapper, Wolfram
Automated macrophage counting in DLBCL tissue samples: a ROF filter based approach
title Automated macrophage counting in DLBCL tissue samples: a ROF filter based approach
title_full Automated macrophage counting in DLBCL tissue samples: a ROF filter based approach
title_fullStr Automated macrophage counting in DLBCL tissue samples: a ROF filter based approach
title_full_unstemmed Automated macrophage counting in DLBCL tissue samples: a ROF filter based approach
title_short Automated macrophage counting in DLBCL tissue samples: a ROF filter based approach
title_sort automated macrophage counting in dlbcl tissue samples: a rof filter based approach
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6600891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0098-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnermarcus automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach
AT hanselrene automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach
AT reinkesarah automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach
AT richterjulia automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach
AT altenbuchingermichael automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach
AT braumannulfdietrich automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach
AT spangrainer automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach
AT lofflermarkus automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach
AT klapperwolfram automatedmacrophagecountingindlbcltissuesamplesaroffilterbasedapproach