Cargando…

Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators?

[Image: see text] In Zeeman deceleration, only a small subset of low-field-seeking particles in the incoming beam possess initial velocities and positions that place them within the phase-space acceptance of the device. In order to maximize the number of particles that are successfully decelerated t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toscano, Jutta, Wu, Lok Yiu, Hejduk, Michal, Heazlewood, Brianna R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b00655
_version_ 1783431221763637248
author Toscano, Jutta
Wu, Lok Yiu
Hejduk, Michal
Heazlewood, Brianna R.
author_facet Toscano, Jutta
Wu, Lok Yiu
Hejduk, Michal
Heazlewood, Brianna R.
author_sort Toscano, Jutta
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In Zeeman deceleration, only a small subset of low-field-seeking particles in the incoming beam possess initial velocities and positions that place them within the phase-space acceptance of the device. In order to maximize the number of particles that are successfully decelerated to a selected final velocity, we seek to optimize the phase-space acceptance of the decelerator. Three-dimensional particle trajectory simulations are employed to investigate the potential benefits of using a covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES) optimization method for decelerators longer than 12 stages and for decelerating species other than H atoms. In all scenarios considered, the evolutionary algorithm-optimized sequences yield vastly more particles within the target velocity range. This is particularly evident in scenarios where standard sequences are known to perform poorly; simulations show that CMA-ES optimization of a standard sequence decelerating H atoms from an initial velocity of 500 ms(–1) down to a final velocity of 200 ms(–1) in a 24-stage decelerator produces a considerable 5921% (or 60-fold) increase in the number of successfully decelerated particles. Particle losses that occur with standard pulse sequences—for example, arising from the coupling of longitudinal and transverse motion—are overcome in the CMA-ES optimization process as the passage of all particles through the decelerator is explicitly considered and focusing effects are accounted for in the optimization process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6601004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66010042019-07-02 Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators? Toscano, Jutta Wu, Lok Yiu Hejduk, Michal Heazlewood, Brianna R. J Phys Chem A [Image: see text] In Zeeman deceleration, only a small subset of low-field-seeking particles in the incoming beam possess initial velocities and positions that place them within the phase-space acceptance of the device. In order to maximize the number of particles that are successfully decelerated to a selected final velocity, we seek to optimize the phase-space acceptance of the decelerator. Three-dimensional particle trajectory simulations are employed to investigate the potential benefits of using a covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES) optimization method for decelerators longer than 12 stages and for decelerating species other than H atoms. In all scenarios considered, the evolutionary algorithm-optimized sequences yield vastly more particles within the target velocity range. This is particularly evident in scenarios where standard sequences are known to perform poorly; simulations show that CMA-ES optimization of a standard sequence decelerating H atoms from an initial velocity of 500 ms(–1) down to a final velocity of 200 ms(–1) in a 24-stage decelerator produces a considerable 5921% (or 60-fold) increase in the number of successfully decelerated particles. Particle losses that occur with standard pulse sequences—for example, arising from the coupling of longitudinal and transverse motion—are overcome in the CMA-ES optimization process as the passage of all particles through the decelerator is explicitly considered and focusing effects are accounted for in the optimization process. American Chemical Society 2019-04-19 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6601004/ /pubmed/31002514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b00655 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.
spellingShingle Toscano, Jutta
Wu, Lok Yiu
Hejduk, Michal
Heazlewood, Brianna R.
Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators?
title Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators?
title_full Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators?
title_fullStr Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators?
title_full_unstemmed Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators?
title_short Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators?
title_sort evolutionary algorithm optimization of zeeman deceleration: is it worthwhile for longer decelerators?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b00655
work_keys_str_mv AT toscanojutta evolutionaryalgorithmoptimizationofzeemandecelerationisitworthwhileforlongerdecelerators
AT wulokyiu evolutionaryalgorithmoptimizationofzeemandecelerationisitworthwhileforlongerdecelerators
AT hejdukmichal evolutionaryalgorithmoptimizationofzeemandecelerationisitworthwhileforlongerdecelerators
AT heazlewoodbriannar evolutionaryalgorithmoptimizationofzeemandecelerationisitworthwhileforlongerdecelerators