Cargando…
Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators?
[Image: see text] In Zeeman deceleration, only a small subset of low-field-seeking particles in the incoming beam possess initial velocities and positions that place them within the phase-space acceptance of the device. In order to maximize the number of particles that are successfully decelerated t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical
Society
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b00655 |
_version_ | 1783431221763637248 |
---|---|
author | Toscano, Jutta Wu, Lok Yiu Hejduk, Michal Heazlewood, Brianna R. |
author_facet | Toscano, Jutta Wu, Lok Yiu Hejduk, Michal Heazlewood, Brianna R. |
author_sort | Toscano, Jutta |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] In Zeeman deceleration, only a small subset of low-field-seeking particles in the incoming beam possess initial velocities and positions that place them within the phase-space acceptance of the device. In order to maximize the number of particles that are successfully decelerated to a selected final velocity, we seek to optimize the phase-space acceptance of the decelerator. Three-dimensional particle trajectory simulations are employed to investigate the potential benefits of using a covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES) optimization method for decelerators longer than 12 stages and for decelerating species other than H atoms. In all scenarios considered, the evolutionary algorithm-optimized sequences yield vastly more particles within the target velocity range. This is particularly evident in scenarios where standard sequences are known to perform poorly; simulations show that CMA-ES optimization of a standard sequence decelerating H atoms from an initial velocity of 500 ms(–1) down to a final velocity of 200 ms(–1) in a 24-stage decelerator produces a considerable 5921% (or 60-fold) increase in the number of successfully decelerated particles. Particle losses that occur with standard pulse sequences—for example, arising from the coupling of longitudinal and transverse motion—are overcome in the CMA-ES optimization process as the passage of all particles through the decelerator is explicitly considered and focusing effects are accounted for in the optimization process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6601004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Chemical
Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66010042019-07-02 Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators? Toscano, Jutta Wu, Lok Yiu Hejduk, Michal Heazlewood, Brianna R. J Phys Chem A [Image: see text] In Zeeman deceleration, only a small subset of low-field-seeking particles in the incoming beam possess initial velocities and positions that place them within the phase-space acceptance of the device. In order to maximize the number of particles that are successfully decelerated to a selected final velocity, we seek to optimize the phase-space acceptance of the decelerator. Three-dimensional particle trajectory simulations are employed to investigate the potential benefits of using a covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES) optimization method for decelerators longer than 12 stages and for decelerating species other than H atoms. In all scenarios considered, the evolutionary algorithm-optimized sequences yield vastly more particles within the target velocity range. This is particularly evident in scenarios where standard sequences are known to perform poorly; simulations show that CMA-ES optimization of a standard sequence decelerating H atoms from an initial velocity of 500 ms(–1) down to a final velocity of 200 ms(–1) in a 24-stage decelerator produces a considerable 5921% (or 60-fold) increase in the number of successfully decelerated particles. Particle losses that occur with standard pulse sequences—for example, arising from the coupling of longitudinal and transverse motion—are overcome in the CMA-ES optimization process as the passage of all particles through the decelerator is explicitly considered and focusing effects are accounted for in the optimization process. American Chemical Society 2019-04-19 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6601004/ /pubmed/31002514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b00655 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Toscano, Jutta Wu, Lok Yiu Hejduk, Michal Heazlewood, Brianna R. Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration: Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators? |
title | Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration:
Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators? |
title_full | Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration:
Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators? |
title_fullStr | Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration:
Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators? |
title_full_unstemmed | Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration:
Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators? |
title_short | Evolutionary Algorithm Optimization of Zeeman Deceleration:
Is It Worthwhile for Longer Decelerators? |
title_sort | evolutionary algorithm optimization of zeeman deceleration:
is it worthwhile for longer decelerators? |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b00655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toscanojutta evolutionaryalgorithmoptimizationofzeemandecelerationisitworthwhileforlongerdecelerators AT wulokyiu evolutionaryalgorithmoptimizationofzeemandecelerationisitworthwhileforlongerdecelerators AT hejdukmichal evolutionaryalgorithmoptimizationofzeemandecelerationisitworthwhileforlongerdecelerators AT heazlewoodbriannar evolutionaryalgorithmoptimizationofzeemandecelerationisitworthwhileforlongerdecelerators |