Cargando…

Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation

OBJECTIVE: The methane mitigating potential of various plant-based polyphenol sources is known, but effects of combinations have rarely been tested. The aim of the present study was to determine whether binary and 3-way combinations of such phenol sources affect ruminal fermentation less, similar or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinz, Susanne, Marquardt, Svenja, Soliva, Carla R., Braun, Ueli, Liesegang, Annette, Kreuzer, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744370
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0665
_version_ 1783431235039657984
author Sinz, Susanne
Marquardt, Svenja
Soliva, Carla R.
Braun, Ueli
Liesegang, Annette
Kreuzer, Michael
author_facet Sinz, Susanne
Marquardt, Svenja
Soliva, Carla R.
Braun, Ueli
Liesegang, Annette
Kreuzer, Michael
author_sort Sinz, Susanne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The methane mitigating potential of various plant-based polyphenol sources is known, but effects of combinations have rarely been tested. The aim of the present study was to determine whether binary and 3-way combinations of such phenol sources affect ruminal fermentation less, similar or more intensively than separate applications. METHODS: The extracts used were from Acacia mearnsii bark (acacia), Vitis vinifera (grape) seed, Camellia sinensis leaves (green tea), Uncaria gambir leaves (gambier), Vaccinium macrocarpon berries (cranberry), Fagopyrum esculentum seed (buckwheat), and Ginkgo biloba leaves (ginkgo). All extracts were tested using the Hohenheim gas test. This was done alone at 5% of dry matter (DM). Acacia was also combined with all other single extracts at 5% of DM each, and with two other phenol sources (all possible combinations) at 2.5%+2.5% of DM. RESULTS: Methane formation was reduced by 7% to 9% by acacia, grape seed and green tea and, in addition, by most extract combinations with acacia. Grape seed and green tea alone and in combination with acacia also reduced methane proportion of total gas to the same degree. The extracts of buckwheat and gingko were poor in phenols and promoted ruminal fermentation. All treatments except green tea alone lowered ammonia concentration by up to 23%, and the binary combinations were more effective as acacia alone. With three extracts, linear effects were found with total gas and methane formation, while with ammonia and other traits linear effects were rare. CONCLUSION: The study identified methane and ammonia mitigating potential of various phenolic plant extracts and showed a number of additive and some non-linear effects of combinations of extracts. Further studies, especially in live animals, should concentrate on combinations of extracts from grape seed, green tea leaves Land acacia bark and determine the ideal dosages of such combinations for the purpose of methane mitigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6601065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66010652019-07-10 Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation Sinz, Susanne Marquardt, Svenja Soliva, Carla R. Braun, Ueli Liesegang, Annette Kreuzer, Michael Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article OBJECTIVE: The methane mitigating potential of various plant-based polyphenol sources is known, but effects of combinations have rarely been tested. The aim of the present study was to determine whether binary and 3-way combinations of such phenol sources affect ruminal fermentation less, similar or more intensively than separate applications. METHODS: The extracts used were from Acacia mearnsii bark (acacia), Vitis vinifera (grape) seed, Camellia sinensis leaves (green tea), Uncaria gambir leaves (gambier), Vaccinium macrocarpon berries (cranberry), Fagopyrum esculentum seed (buckwheat), and Ginkgo biloba leaves (ginkgo). All extracts were tested using the Hohenheim gas test. This was done alone at 5% of dry matter (DM). Acacia was also combined with all other single extracts at 5% of DM each, and with two other phenol sources (all possible combinations) at 2.5%+2.5% of DM. RESULTS: Methane formation was reduced by 7% to 9% by acacia, grape seed and green tea and, in addition, by most extract combinations with acacia. Grape seed and green tea alone and in combination with acacia also reduced methane proportion of total gas to the same degree. The extracts of buckwheat and gingko were poor in phenols and promoted ruminal fermentation. All treatments except green tea alone lowered ammonia concentration by up to 23%, and the binary combinations were more effective as acacia alone. With three extracts, linear effects were found with total gas and methane formation, while with ammonia and other traits linear effects were rare. CONCLUSION: The study identified methane and ammonia mitigating potential of various phenolic plant extracts and showed a number of additive and some non-linear effects of combinations of extracts. Further studies, especially in live animals, should concentrate on combinations of extracts from grape seed, green tea leaves Land acacia bark and determine the ideal dosages of such combinations for the purpose of methane mitigation. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2019-07 2019-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6601065/ /pubmed/30744370 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0665 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Sinz, Susanne
Marquardt, Svenja
Soliva, Carla R.
Braun, Ueli
Liesegang, Annette
Kreuzer, Michael
Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation
title Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation
title_full Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation
title_fullStr Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation
title_full_unstemmed Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation
title_short Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation
title_sort phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744370
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0665
work_keys_str_mv AT sinzsusanne phenolicplantextractsareadditiveintheireffectsagainstinvitroruminalmethaneandammoniaformation
AT marquardtsvenja phenolicplantextractsareadditiveintheireffectsagainstinvitroruminalmethaneandammoniaformation
AT solivacarlar phenolicplantextractsareadditiveintheireffectsagainstinvitroruminalmethaneandammoniaformation
AT braunueli phenolicplantextractsareadditiveintheireffectsagainstinvitroruminalmethaneandammoniaformation
AT liesegangannette phenolicplantextractsareadditiveintheireffectsagainstinvitroruminalmethaneandammoniaformation
AT kreuzermichael phenolicplantextractsareadditiveintheireffectsagainstinvitroruminalmethaneandammoniaformation