Cargando…

Interpretation of In-air Output Ratio of Wedged Fields in Different Measurement Conditions

BACKGROUND: The collimator scatter factor (S(c)) is one of the most important parameters in monitor unit (MU) calculation. There are several factors that impact S(c) values, including head structures, backscatter in dose monitoring chambers, and wedges. The objective of this study was to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehnati, Parinaz, Biglari, Farideh, Jomehzadeh, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316905
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_36_18
_version_ 1783431262966382592
author Mehnati, Parinaz
Biglari, Farideh
Jomehzadeh, Ali
author_facet Mehnati, Parinaz
Biglari, Farideh
Jomehzadeh, Ali
author_sort Mehnati, Parinaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The collimator scatter factor (S(c)) is one of the most important parameters in monitor unit (MU) calculation. There are several factors that impact S(c) values, including head structures, backscatter in dose monitoring chambers, and wedges. The objective of this study was to investigate the variation of S(c) with different buildup cap materials, wall thickness of buildup caps, source-to-chamber distances (SCDs), ionization chambers, and wedge angles in 6 MV photon beam. METHODS: In this study, copper and Perspex buildup caps were made with two different thicknesses for each buildup cap. Measurements were performed on an Elekta Compact medical linear accelerator (6 MV) using RK dosimeter with a sensitive volume of 0.120 cm(3) and Farmer-type ion chamber with a sensitive volume of 0.65 cm(3). In all measurements, buildup caps and ionization chambers were positioned such as to stand vertically to the beam central axis. It was also investigated the effect of internal wedge with different angles (30° and 60°) different SCDs on S(c). RESULTS: It was found in large field sizes, S(c) values in Perspex buildup cap were higher than copper. Different SCDs and type of ion chamber and wall thickness of buildup caps had no significant influence on S(c) values. The presence of wedge influenced S(c) values significantly. Variation of S(c) in wedged fields compared to open fields had a maximum deviation of 0.9% and 6.8% in 30° and 60° wedge angles, respectively. CONCLUSION: It was found that the presence of wedges had a significant influence on S(c) and increases with wedge angles. As such, it should be taken into account in manual MU calculations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6601223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66012232019-07-17 Interpretation of In-air Output Ratio of Wedged Fields in Different Measurement Conditions Mehnati, Parinaz Biglari, Farideh Jomehzadeh, Ali J Med Signals Sens Original Article BACKGROUND: The collimator scatter factor (S(c)) is one of the most important parameters in monitor unit (MU) calculation. There are several factors that impact S(c) values, including head structures, backscatter in dose monitoring chambers, and wedges. The objective of this study was to investigate the variation of S(c) with different buildup cap materials, wall thickness of buildup caps, source-to-chamber distances (SCDs), ionization chambers, and wedge angles in 6 MV photon beam. METHODS: In this study, copper and Perspex buildup caps were made with two different thicknesses for each buildup cap. Measurements were performed on an Elekta Compact medical linear accelerator (6 MV) using RK dosimeter with a sensitive volume of 0.120 cm(3) and Farmer-type ion chamber with a sensitive volume of 0.65 cm(3). In all measurements, buildup caps and ionization chambers were positioned such as to stand vertically to the beam central axis. It was also investigated the effect of internal wedge with different angles (30° and 60°) different SCDs on S(c). RESULTS: It was found in large field sizes, S(c) values in Perspex buildup cap were higher than copper. Different SCDs and type of ion chamber and wall thickness of buildup caps had no significant influence on S(c) values. The presence of wedge influenced S(c) values significantly. Variation of S(c) in wedged fields compared to open fields had a maximum deviation of 0.9% and 6.8% in 30° and 60° wedge angles, respectively. CONCLUSION: It was found that the presence of wedges had a significant influence on S(c) and increases with wedge angles. As such, it should be taken into account in manual MU calculations. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6601223/ /pubmed/31316905 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_36_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mehnati, Parinaz
Biglari, Farideh
Jomehzadeh, Ali
Interpretation of In-air Output Ratio of Wedged Fields in Different Measurement Conditions
title Interpretation of In-air Output Ratio of Wedged Fields in Different Measurement Conditions
title_full Interpretation of In-air Output Ratio of Wedged Fields in Different Measurement Conditions
title_fullStr Interpretation of In-air Output Ratio of Wedged Fields in Different Measurement Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of In-air Output Ratio of Wedged Fields in Different Measurement Conditions
title_short Interpretation of In-air Output Ratio of Wedged Fields in Different Measurement Conditions
title_sort interpretation of in-air output ratio of wedged fields in different measurement conditions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316905
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_36_18
work_keys_str_mv AT mehnatiparinaz interpretationofinairoutputratioofwedgedfieldsindifferentmeasurementconditions
AT biglarifarideh interpretationofinairoutputratioofwedgedfieldsindifferentmeasurementconditions
AT jomehzadehali interpretationofinairoutputratioofwedgedfieldsindifferentmeasurementconditions