Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills

Background: Hardness is considered an important parameter for evaluating the clinical performance of dental implant bone drills. It is connected to the chemical composition, microstructure conformation and manufacture of the surgical drills. Methods: Microstructure of five dental implant drills usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marenzi, Gaetano, Sammartino, Josè Camilla, Scherillo, Fabio, Rengo, Carlo, De Rosa, Alfredo, Graziano, Vincenzo, Spagnuolo, Gianrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12111866
_version_ 1783431273179512832
author Marenzi, Gaetano
Sammartino, Josè Camilla
Scherillo, Fabio
Rengo, Carlo
De Rosa, Alfredo
Graziano, Vincenzo
Spagnuolo, Gianrico
author_facet Marenzi, Gaetano
Sammartino, Josè Camilla
Scherillo, Fabio
Rengo, Carlo
De Rosa, Alfredo
Graziano, Vincenzo
Spagnuolo, Gianrico
author_sort Marenzi, Gaetano
collection PubMed
description Background: Hardness is considered an important parameter for evaluating the clinical performance of dental implant bone drills. It is connected to the chemical composition, microstructure conformation and manufacture of the surgical drills. Methods: Microstructure of five dental implant drills using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) integrated with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Vickers microhardness was measured using a CV 2000 microhardness tester with an indentation force of 500 g. Results: Composition of the implant drills was typical of martensitic stainless steel (MSS). The drills contained 13%–17% of Cr; Mo, Si and Mn were present as minor ligands. The examined bone drills showed different external surface conformation and hardness in relation to the different industrial production processes. A rougher external surface and a higher hardness value are characteristics of the surgical bone drills produced by hot forming; the implant drills produced by machining showed mailing lines on their external surface and a lower hardness. Conclusions: Different compositions and treatments were used by the manufacturers to improve the hardness of the external layer of the dental implant drills making them prone to a diverse heat generation during the implant site preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6601286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66012862019-07-18 Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills Marenzi, Gaetano Sammartino, Josè Camilla Scherillo, Fabio Rengo, Carlo De Rosa, Alfredo Graziano, Vincenzo Spagnuolo, Gianrico Materials (Basel) Article Background: Hardness is considered an important parameter for evaluating the clinical performance of dental implant bone drills. It is connected to the chemical composition, microstructure conformation and manufacture of the surgical drills. Methods: Microstructure of five dental implant drills using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) integrated with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Vickers microhardness was measured using a CV 2000 microhardness tester with an indentation force of 500 g. Results: Composition of the implant drills was typical of martensitic stainless steel (MSS). The drills contained 13%–17% of Cr; Mo, Si and Mn were present as minor ligands. The examined bone drills showed different external surface conformation and hardness in relation to the different industrial production processes. A rougher external surface and a higher hardness value are characteristics of the surgical bone drills produced by hot forming; the implant drills produced by machining showed mailing lines on their external surface and a lower hardness. Conclusions: Different compositions and treatments were used by the manufacturers to improve the hardness of the external layer of the dental implant drills making them prone to a diverse heat generation during the implant site preparation. MDPI 2019-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6601286/ /pubmed/31181858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12111866 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Marenzi, Gaetano
Sammartino, Josè Camilla
Scherillo, Fabio
Rengo, Carlo
De Rosa, Alfredo
Graziano, Vincenzo
Spagnuolo, Gianrico
Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills
title Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills
title_sort comparative analysis of the chemical composition and microstructure conformation between different dental implant bone drills
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12111866
work_keys_str_mv AT marenzigaetano comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills
AT sammartinojosecamilla comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills
AT scherillofabio comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills
AT rengocarlo comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills
AT derosaalfredo comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills
AT grazianovincenzo comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills
AT spagnuologianrico comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills