Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills
Background: Hardness is considered an important parameter for evaluating the clinical performance of dental implant bone drills. It is connected to the chemical composition, microstructure conformation and manufacture of the surgical drills. Methods: Microstructure of five dental implant drills usin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12111866 |
_version_ | 1783431273179512832 |
---|---|
author | Marenzi, Gaetano Sammartino, Josè Camilla Scherillo, Fabio Rengo, Carlo De Rosa, Alfredo Graziano, Vincenzo Spagnuolo, Gianrico |
author_facet | Marenzi, Gaetano Sammartino, Josè Camilla Scherillo, Fabio Rengo, Carlo De Rosa, Alfredo Graziano, Vincenzo Spagnuolo, Gianrico |
author_sort | Marenzi, Gaetano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Hardness is considered an important parameter for evaluating the clinical performance of dental implant bone drills. It is connected to the chemical composition, microstructure conformation and manufacture of the surgical drills. Methods: Microstructure of five dental implant drills using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) integrated with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Vickers microhardness was measured using a CV 2000 microhardness tester with an indentation force of 500 g. Results: Composition of the implant drills was typical of martensitic stainless steel (MSS). The drills contained 13%–17% of Cr; Mo, Si and Mn were present as minor ligands. The examined bone drills showed different external surface conformation and hardness in relation to the different industrial production processes. A rougher external surface and a higher hardness value are characteristics of the surgical bone drills produced by hot forming; the implant drills produced by machining showed mailing lines on their external surface and a lower hardness. Conclusions: Different compositions and treatments were used by the manufacturers to improve the hardness of the external layer of the dental implant drills making them prone to a diverse heat generation during the implant site preparation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6601286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66012862019-07-18 Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills Marenzi, Gaetano Sammartino, Josè Camilla Scherillo, Fabio Rengo, Carlo De Rosa, Alfredo Graziano, Vincenzo Spagnuolo, Gianrico Materials (Basel) Article Background: Hardness is considered an important parameter for evaluating the clinical performance of dental implant bone drills. It is connected to the chemical composition, microstructure conformation and manufacture of the surgical drills. Methods: Microstructure of five dental implant drills using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) integrated with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Vickers microhardness was measured using a CV 2000 microhardness tester with an indentation force of 500 g. Results: Composition of the implant drills was typical of martensitic stainless steel (MSS). The drills contained 13%–17% of Cr; Mo, Si and Mn were present as minor ligands. The examined bone drills showed different external surface conformation and hardness in relation to the different industrial production processes. A rougher external surface and a higher hardness value are characteristics of the surgical bone drills produced by hot forming; the implant drills produced by machining showed mailing lines on their external surface and a lower hardness. Conclusions: Different compositions and treatments were used by the manufacturers to improve the hardness of the external layer of the dental implant drills making them prone to a diverse heat generation during the implant site preparation. MDPI 2019-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6601286/ /pubmed/31181858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12111866 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Marenzi, Gaetano Sammartino, Josè Camilla Scherillo, Fabio Rengo, Carlo De Rosa, Alfredo Graziano, Vincenzo Spagnuolo, Gianrico Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills |
title | Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills |
title_sort | comparative analysis of the chemical composition and microstructure conformation between different dental implant bone drills |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12111866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marenzigaetano comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills AT sammartinojosecamilla comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills AT scherillofabio comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills AT rengocarlo comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills AT derosaalfredo comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills AT grazianovincenzo comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills AT spagnuologianrico comparativeanalysisofthechemicalcompositionandmicrostructureconformationbetweendifferentdentalimplantbonedrills |