Cargando…

The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices that drain into the subconjunctival space can be inserted via an ab externo or ab interno approach. Limited experimental data exists as to the impact of either technique on intraocular pressure (IOP) control. We performed microfluidic studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Richard M. H., Bouremel, Yann, Eames, Ian, Brocchini, Steve, Khaw, Peng Tee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.58
_version_ 1783431340322979840
author Lee, Richard M. H.
Bouremel, Yann
Eames, Ian
Brocchini, Steve
Khaw, Peng Tee
author_facet Lee, Richard M. H.
Bouremel, Yann
Eames, Ian
Brocchini, Steve
Khaw, Peng Tee
author_sort Lee, Richard M. H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices that drain into the subconjunctival space can be inserted via an ab externo or ab interno approach. Limited experimental data exists as to the impact of either technique on intraocular pressure (IOP) control. We performed microfluidic studies by using ex vivo rabbit eyes to assess the effect of each approach on outflow resistance of a subconjunctival drainage device for IOP control. METHODS: A microfluidic experiment system was designed, consisting of a controlled reservoir of water connected to a pressure pump/flow sensor. The flow rate of water was fixed at 2 μl/min to simulate aqueous humor production. The pressure readings for each approach were recorded at a frequency of 1 Hz. A baseline reading was made before tube insertion into the eye (PEEK tube length set to aim for an initial outflow resistance of 5 to 10 mm Hg/μL/min) followed by measurements for a cumulative 2-ml volume entering the subconjunctival space. Results were adjusted for water viscosity at 37°C and reported as outflow resistance (mm Hg/μL/min ± standard error of mean). RESULTS: Outflow resistance via the ab interno approach was 90.4% higher than with the ab externo approach being measured at 0.80 ± 0.11 mm Hg/μL/min and 0.42 ± 0.05 mm Hg/μL/min, respectively. Bleb formation was observed to be less predictable with the ab interno approach. CONCLUSIONS: The ab interno approach demonstrated greater outflow resistance and less predictable bleb formation than the ab externo approach. These results have implications for long-term IOP control and success depending on the approach to device insertion and could be an important consideration for future MIGS devices. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The effect of the ab interno versus ab externo approach of a MIGS device inserted into the subconjunctival space was assessed. The ab interno approach demonstrated greater outflow resistance and less predictable bleb formation that may have implications for the development of future MIGS devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6602120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66021202019-07-10 The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control Lee, Richard M. H. Bouremel, Yann Eames, Ian Brocchini, Steve Khaw, Peng Tee Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices that drain into the subconjunctival space can be inserted via an ab externo or ab interno approach. Limited experimental data exists as to the impact of either technique on intraocular pressure (IOP) control. We performed microfluidic studies by using ex vivo rabbit eyes to assess the effect of each approach on outflow resistance of a subconjunctival drainage device for IOP control. METHODS: A microfluidic experiment system was designed, consisting of a controlled reservoir of water connected to a pressure pump/flow sensor. The flow rate of water was fixed at 2 μl/min to simulate aqueous humor production. The pressure readings for each approach were recorded at a frequency of 1 Hz. A baseline reading was made before tube insertion into the eye (PEEK tube length set to aim for an initial outflow resistance of 5 to 10 mm Hg/μL/min) followed by measurements for a cumulative 2-ml volume entering the subconjunctival space. Results were adjusted for water viscosity at 37°C and reported as outflow resistance (mm Hg/μL/min ± standard error of mean). RESULTS: Outflow resistance via the ab interno approach was 90.4% higher than with the ab externo approach being measured at 0.80 ± 0.11 mm Hg/μL/min and 0.42 ± 0.05 mm Hg/μL/min, respectively. Bleb formation was observed to be less predictable with the ab interno approach. CONCLUSIONS: The ab interno approach demonstrated greater outflow resistance and less predictable bleb formation than the ab externo approach. These results have implications for long-term IOP control and success depending on the approach to device insertion and could be an important consideration for future MIGS devices. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The effect of the ab interno versus ab externo approach of a MIGS device inserted into the subconjunctival space was assessed. The ab interno approach demonstrated greater outflow resistance and less predictable bleb formation that may have implications for the development of future MIGS devices. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6602120/ /pubmed/31293813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.58 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Lee, Richard M. H.
Bouremel, Yann
Eames, Ian
Brocchini, Steve
Khaw, Peng Tee
The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control
title The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control
title_full The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control
title_fullStr The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control
title_full_unstemmed The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control
title_short The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control
title_sort implications of an ab interno versus ab externo surgical approach on outflow resistance of a subconjunctival drainage device for intraocular pressure control
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.58
work_keys_str_mv AT leerichardmh theimplicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT bouremelyann theimplicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT eamesian theimplicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT brocchinisteve theimplicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT khawpengtee theimplicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT leerichardmh implicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT bouremelyann implicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT eamesian implicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT brocchinisteve implicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol
AT khawpengtee implicationsofanabinternoversusabexternosurgicalapproachonoutflowresistanceofasubconjunctivaldrainagedeviceforintraocularpressurecontrol