Cargando…
Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis
BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a world-wide extended zoonosis that causes a grave problem in developing economies. Animal vaccination and diagnosis are essential to control brucellosis, and the need for accurate but also simple and low-cost tests that can be implemented in low-infrastructure laboratorie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007509 |
_version_ | 1783431358086905856 |
---|---|
author | Gusi, Amahyel M. Bertu, Wilson J. Jesús de Miguel, M. Dieste-Pérez, Lucía Smits, Henk L. Ocholi, Reuben A. Blasco, José M. Moriyón, Ignacio Muñoz, Pilar M. |
author_facet | Gusi, Amahyel M. Bertu, Wilson J. Jesús de Miguel, M. Dieste-Pérez, Lucía Smits, Henk L. Ocholi, Reuben A. Blasco, José M. Moriyón, Ignacio Muñoz, Pilar M. |
author_sort | Gusi, Amahyel M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a world-wide extended zoonosis that causes a grave problem in developing economies. Animal vaccination and diagnosis are essential to control brucellosis, and the need for accurate but also simple and low-cost tests that can be implemented in low-infrastructure laboratories has been emphasized. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated bovine, sheep, goat and swine lateral flow immunochromatography assay kits (LFA), the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and a well-validated protein G indirect ELISA (iELISA) using sera of Brucella culture-positive and unvaccinated brucellosis free livestock. Sera from cattle vaccinated with S19 and RB51 brucellosis vaccines were also tested. Finally, we compared RBT and LFA using sera of white Fulani cattle of unknown bacteriological status from a brucellosis endemic area of Nigeria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although differences were not statistically significant, RBT showed the highest values for diagnostic sensitivity/specificity in cattle (LFA, 96.6/98.8; RBT, 98.9/100; and iELISA, 96.6/100) and the iELISA yielded highest values in sheep (LFA, 94.0/100; RBT, 92.0/100; iELISA, 100/100), goats (LFA, 95.7/96.2; RBT, 97.8/100; iELISA, 100/100) and pigs (LFA, 92.3/100; RBT, 92.3/100; iELISA, 100/100). Vaccine S19 administered subcutaneously interfered in all tests but conjunctival application minimized the problem. Although designed not to interfere in serodiagnosis, vaccine RB51 interfered in LFA and iELISA but not in the RBT. We found closely similar apparent prevalence results when testing the Nigerian Fulani cattle by RBT and LFA. Although both RBT and LFA (showing similar diagnostic performance) are suitable for small laboratories in resource-limited areas, RBT has the advantage that a single reagent is useful in all animal species. Considering these advantages, its low cost and that it is also useful for human brucellosis diagnosis, RBT might be a good choice for resource-limited laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6602290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66022902019-07-12 Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis Gusi, Amahyel M. Bertu, Wilson J. Jesús de Miguel, M. Dieste-Pérez, Lucía Smits, Henk L. Ocholi, Reuben A. Blasco, José M. Moriyón, Ignacio Muñoz, Pilar M. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a world-wide extended zoonosis that causes a grave problem in developing economies. Animal vaccination and diagnosis are essential to control brucellosis, and the need for accurate but also simple and low-cost tests that can be implemented in low-infrastructure laboratories has been emphasized. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated bovine, sheep, goat and swine lateral flow immunochromatography assay kits (LFA), the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and a well-validated protein G indirect ELISA (iELISA) using sera of Brucella culture-positive and unvaccinated brucellosis free livestock. Sera from cattle vaccinated with S19 and RB51 brucellosis vaccines were also tested. Finally, we compared RBT and LFA using sera of white Fulani cattle of unknown bacteriological status from a brucellosis endemic area of Nigeria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although differences were not statistically significant, RBT showed the highest values for diagnostic sensitivity/specificity in cattle (LFA, 96.6/98.8; RBT, 98.9/100; and iELISA, 96.6/100) and the iELISA yielded highest values in sheep (LFA, 94.0/100; RBT, 92.0/100; iELISA, 100/100), goats (LFA, 95.7/96.2; RBT, 97.8/100; iELISA, 100/100) and pigs (LFA, 92.3/100; RBT, 92.3/100; iELISA, 100/100). Vaccine S19 administered subcutaneously interfered in all tests but conjunctival application minimized the problem. Although designed not to interfere in serodiagnosis, vaccine RB51 interfered in LFA and iELISA but not in the RBT. We found closely similar apparent prevalence results when testing the Nigerian Fulani cattle by RBT and LFA. Although both RBT and LFA (showing similar diagnostic performance) are suitable for small laboratories in resource-limited areas, RBT has the advantage that a single reagent is useful in all animal species. Considering these advantages, its low cost and that it is also useful for human brucellosis diagnosis, RBT might be a good choice for resource-limited laboratories. Public Library of Science 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6602290/ /pubmed/31216271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007509 Text en © 2019 Gusi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gusi, Amahyel M. Bertu, Wilson J. Jesús de Miguel, M. Dieste-Pérez, Lucía Smits, Henk L. Ocholi, Reuben A. Blasco, José M. Moriyón, Ignacio Muñoz, Pilar M. Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis |
title | Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis |
title_full | Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis |
title_fullStr | Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis |
title_short | Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis |
title_sort | comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, ielisa and rose bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gusiamahyelm comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis AT bertuwilsonj comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis AT jesusdemiguelm comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis AT diesteperezlucia comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis AT smitshenkl comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis AT ocholireubena comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis AT blascojosem comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis AT moriyonignacio comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis AT munozpilarm comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis |