Cargando…

Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a world-wide extended zoonosis that causes a grave problem in developing economies. Animal vaccination and diagnosis are essential to control brucellosis, and the need for accurate but also simple and low-cost tests that can be implemented in low-infrastructure laboratorie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gusi, Amahyel M., Bertu, Wilson J., Jesús de Miguel, M., Dieste-Pérez, Lucía, Smits, Henk L., Ocholi, Reuben A., Blasco, José M., Moriyón, Ignacio, Muñoz, Pilar M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007509
_version_ 1783431358086905856
author Gusi, Amahyel M.
Bertu, Wilson J.
Jesús de Miguel, M.
Dieste-Pérez, Lucía
Smits, Henk L.
Ocholi, Reuben A.
Blasco, José M.
Moriyón, Ignacio
Muñoz, Pilar M.
author_facet Gusi, Amahyel M.
Bertu, Wilson J.
Jesús de Miguel, M.
Dieste-Pérez, Lucía
Smits, Henk L.
Ocholi, Reuben A.
Blasco, José M.
Moriyón, Ignacio
Muñoz, Pilar M.
author_sort Gusi, Amahyel M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a world-wide extended zoonosis that causes a grave problem in developing economies. Animal vaccination and diagnosis are essential to control brucellosis, and the need for accurate but also simple and low-cost tests that can be implemented in low-infrastructure laboratories has been emphasized. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated bovine, sheep, goat and swine lateral flow immunochromatography assay kits (LFA), the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and a well-validated protein G indirect ELISA (iELISA) using sera of Brucella culture-positive and unvaccinated brucellosis free livestock. Sera from cattle vaccinated with S19 and RB51 brucellosis vaccines were also tested. Finally, we compared RBT and LFA using sera of white Fulani cattle of unknown bacteriological status from a brucellosis endemic area of Nigeria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although differences were not statistically significant, RBT showed the highest values for diagnostic sensitivity/specificity in cattle (LFA, 96.6/98.8; RBT, 98.9/100; and iELISA, 96.6/100) and the iELISA yielded highest values in sheep (LFA, 94.0/100; RBT, 92.0/100; iELISA, 100/100), goats (LFA, 95.7/96.2; RBT, 97.8/100; iELISA, 100/100) and pigs (LFA, 92.3/100; RBT, 92.3/100; iELISA, 100/100). Vaccine S19 administered subcutaneously interfered in all tests but conjunctival application minimized the problem. Although designed not to interfere in serodiagnosis, vaccine RB51 interfered in LFA and iELISA but not in the RBT. We found closely similar apparent prevalence results when testing the Nigerian Fulani cattle by RBT and LFA. Although both RBT and LFA (showing similar diagnostic performance) are suitable for small laboratories in resource-limited areas, RBT has the advantage that a single reagent is useful in all animal species. Considering these advantages, its low cost and that it is also useful for human brucellosis diagnosis, RBT might be a good choice for resource-limited laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6602290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66022902019-07-12 Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis Gusi, Amahyel M. Bertu, Wilson J. Jesús de Miguel, M. Dieste-Pérez, Lucía Smits, Henk L. Ocholi, Reuben A. Blasco, José M. Moriyón, Ignacio Muñoz, Pilar M. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a world-wide extended zoonosis that causes a grave problem in developing economies. Animal vaccination and diagnosis are essential to control brucellosis, and the need for accurate but also simple and low-cost tests that can be implemented in low-infrastructure laboratories has been emphasized. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated bovine, sheep, goat and swine lateral flow immunochromatography assay kits (LFA), the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and a well-validated protein G indirect ELISA (iELISA) using sera of Brucella culture-positive and unvaccinated brucellosis free livestock. Sera from cattle vaccinated with S19 and RB51 brucellosis vaccines were also tested. Finally, we compared RBT and LFA using sera of white Fulani cattle of unknown bacteriological status from a brucellosis endemic area of Nigeria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although differences were not statistically significant, RBT showed the highest values for diagnostic sensitivity/specificity in cattle (LFA, 96.6/98.8; RBT, 98.9/100; and iELISA, 96.6/100) and the iELISA yielded highest values in sheep (LFA, 94.0/100; RBT, 92.0/100; iELISA, 100/100), goats (LFA, 95.7/96.2; RBT, 97.8/100; iELISA, 100/100) and pigs (LFA, 92.3/100; RBT, 92.3/100; iELISA, 100/100). Vaccine S19 administered subcutaneously interfered in all tests but conjunctival application minimized the problem. Although designed not to interfere in serodiagnosis, vaccine RB51 interfered in LFA and iELISA but not in the RBT. We found closely similar apparent prevalence results when testing the Nigerian Fulani cattle by RBT and LFA. Although both RBT and LFA (showing similar diagnostic performance) are suitable for small laboratories in resource-limited areas, RBT has the advantage that a single reagent is useful in all animal species. Considering these advantages, its low cost and that it is also useful for human brucellosis diagnosis, RBT might be a good choice for resource-limited laboratories. Public Library of Science 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6602290/ /pubmed/31216271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007509 Text en © 2019 Gusi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gusi, Amahyel M.
Bertu, Wilson J.
Jesús de Miguel, M.
Dieste-Pérez, Lucía
Smits, Henk L.
Ocholi, Reuben A.
Blasco, José M.
Moriyón, Ignacio
Muñoz, Pilar M.
Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis
title Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis
title_full Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis
title_fullStr Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis
title_short Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis
title_sort comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, ielisa and rose bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007509
work_keys_str_mv AT gusiamahyelm comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis
AT bertuwilsonj comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis
AT jesusdemiguelm comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis
AT diesteperezlucia comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis
AT smitshenkl comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis
AT ocholireubena comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis
AT blascojosem comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis
AT moriyonignacio comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis
AT munozpilarm comparativeperformanceoflateralflowimmunochromatographyielisaandrosebengaltestsforthediagnosisofcattlesheepgoatandswinebrucellosis