Cargando…

The Effect of Allogenic Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transfer on Symptoms, Visceral Perception and Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study

Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is suggested as a potential treatment for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to study the effect of allogenic and autologous FMT on IBS symptoms, visceral sensitivity, and compositional changes in fecal and mucosa-adherent microbiota. METHODS: Seve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holster, Savanne, Lindqvist, Carl Mårten, Repsilber, Dirk, Salonen, Anne, de Vos, Willem M., König, Julia, Brummer, Robert J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31009405
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000034
_version_ 1783431405659750400
author Holster, Savanne
Lindqvist, Carl Mårten
Repsilber, Dirk
Salonen, Anne
de Vos, Willem M.
König, Julia
Brummer, Robert J.
author_facet Holster, Savanne
Lindqvist, Carl Mårten
Repsilber, Dirk
Salonen, Anne
de Vos, Willem M.
König, Julia
Brummer, Robert J.
author_sort Holster, Savanne
collection PubMed
description Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is suggested as a potential treatment for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to study the effect of allogenic and autologous FMT on IBS symptoms, visceral sensitivity, and compositional changes in fecal and mucosa-adherent microbiota. METHODS: Seventeen patients with IBS were randomized either to receive fecal material from a healthy donor (allogenic) or to receive their own fecal material (autologous). The fecal material was administered into the cecum by whole colonoscopy after bowel cleansing. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the allogenic and the autologous FMT regarding symptom scores. However, symptom scores of patients receiving allogenic fecal material significantly decreased after FMT compared with baseline (P = 0.02), which was not the case in the autologous group (P = 0.16). Visceral sensitivity was not affected except for a small beneficial effect on urge scores in the autologous group (P < 0.05). While both fecal and mucosa-adherent microbiota of some patients shifted to their respective donor's fecal microbiota, some patients showed no relevant microbial changes after allogenic FMT. Large compositional shifts in fecal and mucosa-adherent microbiota also occurred in the autologous group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a single FMT by colonoscopy may have beneficial effects in IBS; however, the allogenic fecal material was not superior to the autologous fecal material. This suggests that bowel cleansing prior to the colonoscopy and/or processing of the fecal material as part of the FMT routine contribute to symptoms and gut microbiota composition changes in IBS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6602784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66027842019-10-10 The Effect of Allogenic Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transfer on Symptoms, Visceral Perception and Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study Holster, Savanne Lindqvist, Carl Mårten Repsilber, Dirk Salonen, Anne de Vos, Willem M. König, Julia Brummer, Robert J. Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is suggested as a potential treatment for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to study the effect of allogenic and autologous FMT on IBS symptoms, visceral sensitivity, and compositional changes in fecal and mucosa-adherent microbiota. METHODS: Seventeen patients with IBS were randomized either to receive fecal material from a healthy donor (allogenic) or to receive their own fecal material (autologous). The fecal material was administered into the cecum by whole colonoscopy after bowel cleansing. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the allogenic and the autologous FMT regarding symptom scores. However, symptom scores of patients receiving allogenic fecal material significantly decreased after FMT compared with baseline (P = 0.02), which was not the case in the autologous group (P = 0.16). Visceral sensitivity was not affected except for a small beneficial effect on urge scores in the autologous group (P < 0.05). While both fecal and mucosa-adherent microbiota of some patients shifted to their respective donor's fecal microbiota, some patients showed no relevant microbial changes after allogenic FMT. Large compositional shifts in fecal and mucosa-adherent microbiota also occurred in the autologous group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a single FMT by colonoscopy may have beneficial effects in IBS; however, the allogenic fecal material was not superior to the autologous fecal material. This suggests that bowel cleansing prior to the colonoscopy and/or processing of the fecal material as part of the FMT routine contribute to symptoms and gut microbiota composition changes in IBS. Wolters Kluwer 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6602784/ /pubmed/31009405 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000034 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Holster, Savanne
Lindqvist, Carl Mårten
Repsilber, Dirk
Salonen, Anne
de Vos, Willem M.
König, Julia
Brummer, Robert J.
The Effect of Allogenic Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transfer on Symptoms, Visceral Perception and Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
title The Effect of Allogenic Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transfer on Symptoms, Visceral Perception and Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full The Effect of Allogenic Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transfer on Symptoms, Visceral Perception and Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr The Effect of Allogenic Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transfer on Symptoms, Visceral Perception and Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Allogenic Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transfer on Symptoms, Visceral Perception and Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_short The Effect of Allogenic Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transfer on Symptoms, Visceral Perception and Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort effect of allogenic versus autologous fecal microbiota transfer on symptoms, visceral perception and fecal and mucosal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized controlled study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31009405
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000034
work_keys_str_mv AT holstersavanne theeffectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lindqvistcarlmarten theeffectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT repsilberdirk theeffectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT salonenanne theeffectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT devoswillemm theeffectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT konigjulia theeffectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT brummerrobertj theeffectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT holstersavanne effectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lindqvistcarlmarten effectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT repsilberdirk effectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT salonenanne effectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT devoswillemm effectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT konigjulia effectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT brummerrobertj effectofallogenicversusautologousfecalmicrobiotatransferonsymptomsvisceralperceptionandfecalandmucosalmicrobiotainirritablebowelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudy