Cargando…

Clinical Modality of Resistance and Subsequent Management of Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Failing Treatment with Osimertinib

BACKGROUND: The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib has become the standard treatment for patients with pretreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who acquire the T790M resistance mutation. However, no standard treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mu, Yuxin, Hao, Xuezhi, Yang, Ke, Ma, Di, Wang, Shouzheng, Xu, Ziyi, Li, Junling, Xing, Puyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31124059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-019-00644-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib has become the standard treatment for patients with pretreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who acquire the T790M resistance mutation. However, no standard treatment after osimertinib failure has been established. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to explore the clinical resistance modality upon failure of osimertinib therapy and to assess post-progression treatments in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical data were retrospectively collected in our cancer center of patients with advanced NSCLC treated between 1 March 2017 and 1 July 2018, and who developed resistance to osimertinib. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were analyzed. Clinical resistance modality varied among patients: 15 (23.1%) with local progression, 29 (44.6%) with gradual progression, and 21 (32.3%) with dramatic progression. Most patients experienced intrathoracic progression only (40/65, 61.5%), while ten (15.4%) cases presented intracranial failure only. Upon progressive disease, 20 patients (30.8%) received subsequent chemotherapy, and showed a trend for longer median overall survival (OS) than in those receiving a non-chemotherapy regimen (25.0 vs. 11.8 months, p = 0.106). Thirty-nine patients (60.0%) continued osimertinib beyond progression with a median post-progression treatment duration of 4.1 months. No significant difference in median OS was seen between patients who continued osimertinib and those who discontinued osimertinib (18.9 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.802). In subgroup analyses, OS was improved in patients who experienced dramatic progression and were treated with chemotherapy, but data were immature for patients with local or gradual progression. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy could be an effective option after osimertinib failure in unselected patients.