Cargando…
Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
American Thoracic Society
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201902-0419LE |
| _version_ | 1783431443806945280 |
|---|---|
| author | Karim, Habib M. R. Esquinas, Antonio M. |
| author_facet | Karim, Habib M. R. Esquinas, Antonio M. |
| author_sort | Karim, Habib M. R. |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-6603054 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | American Thoracic Society |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-66030542019-07-16 Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better Karim, Habib M. R. Esquinas, Antonio M. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Correspondence American Thoracic Society 2019-07-01 2019-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6603054/ /pubmed/30896964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201902-0419LE Text en Copyright © 2019 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). For commercial usage and reprints, please contact Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org). |
| spellingShingle | Correspondence Karim, Habib M. R. Esquinas, Antonio M. Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better |
| title | Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better |
| title_full | Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better |
| title_fullStr | Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better |
| title_full_unstemmed | Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better |
| title_short | Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better |
| title_sort | success or failure of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy: the rox index is good, but a modified rox index may be better |
| topic | Correspondence |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201902-0419LE |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT karimhabibmr successorfailureofhighflownasaloxygentherapytheroxindexisgoodbutamodifiedroxindexmaybebetter AT esquinasantoniom successorfailureofhighflownasaloxygentherapytheroxindexisgoodbutamodifiedroxindexmaybebetter |