Cargando…
Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and physical disability, with a global lifetime incidence rate of 1 in 6. Currently, the only FDA approved treatment for ischemic stroke is the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Stem cell clinical trials for stroke have been underway fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00656 |
_version_ | 1783431451681751040 |
---|---|
author | Krause, Mirja Phan, Thanh G. Ma, Henry Sobey, Christopher G. Lim, Rebecca |
author_facet | Krause, Mirja Phan, Thanh G. Ma, Henry Sobey, Christopher G. Lim, Rebecca |
author_sort | Krause, Mirja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stroke is the second leading cause of death and physical disability, with a global lifetime incidence rate of 1 in 6. Currently, the only FDA approved treatment for ischemic stroke is the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Stem cell clinical trials for stroke have been underway for close to two decades, with data suggesting that cell therapies are safe, feasible, and potentially efficacious. However, clinical trials for stroke account for <1% of all stem cell trials. Nevertheless, the resources devoted to clinical research to identify new treatments for stroke is still significant (53–64 million US$, Phase 1–4). Notably, a quarter of cell therapy clinical trials for stroke have been withdrawn (15.2%) or terminated (6.8%) to date. This review discusses the bottlenecks in delivering a successful cell therapy for stroke, and the cost-to-benefit ratio necessary to justify these expensive trials. Further, this review will critically assess the currently available data from completed stroke trials, the importance of standardization in outcome reporting, and the role of industry-led research in the development of cell therapies for stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6603096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66030962019-07-10 Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet? Krause, Mirja Phan, Thanh G. Ma, Henry Sobey, Christopher G. Lim, Rebecca Front Neurol Neurology Stroke is the second leading cause of death and physical disability, with a global lifetime incidence rate of 1 in 6. Currently, the only FDA approved treatment for ischemic stroke is the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Stem cell clinical trials for stroke have been underway for close to two decades, with data suggesting that cell therapies are safe, feasible, and potentially efficacious. However, clinical trials for stroke account for <1% of all stem cell trials. Nevertheless, the resources devoted to clinical research to identify new treatments for stroke is still significant (53–64 million US$, Phase 1–4). Notably, a quarter of cell therapy clinical trials for stroke have been withdrawn (15.2%) or terminated (6.8%) to date. This review discusses the bottlenecks in delivering a successful cell therapy for stroke, and the cost-to-benefit ratio necessary to justify these expensive trials. Further, this review will critically assess the currently available data from completed stroke trials, the importance of standardization in outcome reporting, and the role of industry-led research in the development of cell therapies for stroke. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6603096/ /pubmed/31293500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00656 Text en Copyright © 2019 Krause, Phan, Ma, Sobey and Lim. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Krause, Mirja Phan, Thanh G. Ma, Henry Sobey, Christopher G. Lim, Rebecca Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet? |
title | Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet? |
title_full | Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet? |
title_fullStr | Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet? |
title_short | Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet? |
title_sort | cell-based therapies for stroke: are we there yet? |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krausemirja cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet AT phanthanhg cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet AT mahenry cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet AT sobeychristopherg cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet AT limrebecca cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet |