Cargando…

Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and physical disability, with a global lifetime incidence rate of 1 in 6. Currently, the only FDA approved treatment for ischemic stroke is the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Stem cell clinical trials for stroke have been underway fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krause, Mirja, Phan, Thanh G., Ma, Henry, Sobey, Christopher G., Lim, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00656
_version_ 1783431451681751040
author Krause, Mirja
Phan, Thanh G.
Ma, Henry
Sobey, Christopher G.
Lim, Rebecca
author_facet Krause, Mirja
Phan, Thanh G.
Ma, Henry
Sobey, Christopher G.
Lim, Rebecca
author_sort Krause, Mirja
collection PubMed
description Stroke is the second leading cause of death and physical disability, with a global lifetime incidence rate of 1 in 6. Currently, the only FDA approved treatment for ischemic stroke is the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Stem cell clinical trials for stroke have been underway for close to two decades, with data suggesting that cell therapies are safe, feasible, and potentially efficacious. However, clinical trials for stroke account for <1% of all stem cell trials. Nevertheless, the resources devoted to clinical research to identify new treatments for stroke is still significant (53–64 million US$, Phase 1–4). Notably, a quarter of cell therapy clinical trials for stroke have been withdrawn (15.2%) or terminated (6.8%) to date. This review discusses the bottlenecks in delivering a successful cell therapy for stroke, and the cost-to-benefit ratio necessary to justify these expensive trials. Further, this review will critically assess the currently available data from completed stroke trials, the importance of standardization in outcome reporting, and the role of industry-led research in the development of cell therapies for stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6603096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66030962019-07-10 Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet? Krause, Mirja Phan, Thanh G. Ma, Henry Sobey, Christopher G. Lim, Rebecca Front Neurol Neurology Stroke is the second leading cause of death and physical disability, with a global lifetime incidence rate of 1 in 6. Currently, the only FDA approved treatment for ischemic stroke is the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Stem cell clinical trials for stroke have been underway for close to two decades, with data suggesting that cell therapies are safe, feasible, and potentially efficacious. However, clinical trials for stroke account for <1% of all stem cell trials. Nevertheless, the resources devoted to clinical research to identify new treatments for stroke is still significant (53–64 million US$, Phase 1–4). Notably, a quarter of cell therapy clinical trials for stroke have been withdrawn (15.2%) or terminated (6.8%) to date. This review discusses the bottlenecks in delivering a successful cell therapy for stroke, and the cost-to-benefit ratio necessary to justify these expensive trials. Further, this review will critically assess the currently available data from completed stroke trials, the importance of standardization in outcome reporting, and the role of industry-led research in the development of cell therapies for stroke. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6603096/ /pubmed/31293500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00656 Text en Copyright © 2019 Krause, Phan, Ma, Sobey and Lim. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Krause, Mirja
Phan, Thanh G.
Ma, Henry
Sobey, Christopher G.
Lim, Rebecca
Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?
title Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?
title_full Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?
title_fullStr Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?
title_full_unstemmed Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?
title_short Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?
title_sort cell-based therapies for stroke: are we there yet?
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00656
work_keys_str_mv AT krausemirja cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet
AT phanthanhg cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet
AT mahenry cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet
AT sobeychristopherg cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet
AT limrebecca cellbasedtherapiesforstrokearewethereyet