Cargando…

Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system

AIM: Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumada, Keisuke, Murakami, Nobuo, Okada, Hideshi, Toyoda, Izumi, Ogura, Shinji, Asano, Takahiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410
_version_ 1783431497686974464
author Kumada, Keisuke
Murakami, Nobuo
Okada, Hideshi
Toyoda, Izumi
Ogura, Shinji
Asano, Takahiko
author_facet Kumada, Keisuke
Murakami, Nobuo
Okada, Hideshi
Toyoda, Izumi
Ogura, Shinji
Asano, Takahiko
author_sort Kumada, Keisuke
collection PubMed
description AIM: Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback system. METHODS: The subject sample included trauma patients who underwent whole‐body CT while being examined for trauma during the 2‐year period, with the interpretation of the CT reported by a radiologist. The frequency and recognition of incidental findings and the involved body region were investigated. The state of incidental findings before and after implementation of a radiography report feedback system was also examined. RESULTS: During the study period, whole‐body CT revealed incidental findings in 79 of 199 trauma patients (40.1%). The mean age of the 79 patients with incidental findings was 62.8 ± 19.5 years, and the mean injury severity score was 16.6 ± 10.0. No difference was observed in the severity of trauma, age, or length of hospital stay. The incidental findings were related to the liver/gallbladder in 22 patients, kidneys in 17, lungs in 14, and the intracranial area in 13. The recognition rate of incidental findings after the implementation of the feedback system increased from 23.3% to 32.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that not all incidental findings are accurately recognized, a proper feedback system is required. A feedback system is beneficial and a need to ensure improvement in the recognition of incidental findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6603323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66033232019-07-12 Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system Kumada, Keisuke Murakami, Nobuo Okada, Hideshi Toyoda, Izumi Ogura, Shinji Asano, Takahiko Acute Med Surg Original Articles AIM: Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback system. METHODS: The subject sample included trauma patients who underwent whole‐body CT while being examined for trauma during the 2‐year period, with the interpretation of the CT reported by a radiologist. The frequency and recognition of incidental findings and the involved body region were investigated. The state of incidental findings before and after implementation of a radiography report feedback system was also examined. RESULTS: During the study period, whole‐body CT revealed incidental findings in 79 of 199 trauma patients (40.1%). The mean age of the 79 patients with incidental findings was 62.8 ± 19.5 years, and the mean injury severity score was 16.6 ± 10.0. No difference was observed in the severity of trauma, age, or length of hospital stay. The incidental findings were related to the liver/gallbladder in 22 patients, kidneys in 17, lungs in 14, and the intracranial area in 13. The recognition rate of incidental findings after the implementation of the feedback system increased from 23.3% to 32.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that not all incidental findings are accurately recognized, a proper feedback system is required. A feedback system is beneficial and a need to ensure improvement in the recognition of incidental findings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6603323/ /pubmed/31304029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Acute Medicine & Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kumada, Keisuke
Murakami, Nobuo
Okada, Hideshi
Toyoda, Izumi
Ogura, Shinji
Asano, Takahiko
Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_full Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_fullStr Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_full_unstemmed Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_short Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_sort incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410
work_keys_str_mv AT kumadakeisuke incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT murakaminobuo incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT okadahideshi incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT toyodaizumi incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT ogurashinji incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT asanotakahiko incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem