Cargando…

Parameter Selection for a Microvolume Electrochemical Escherichia coli Detector for Pairing with a Concentration Device

Waterborne infections are responsible for health problems worldwide and their prompt and sensitive detection in recreational and potable water is of great importance. Bacterial identification and enumeration in water samples ensures water is safe for its intended use. Culture-based methods can be ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Evelina J. Y., Palanisamy, Kannan, Hinks, Jamie, Wuertz, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31141970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112437
_version_ 1783431540647133184
author Han, Evelina J. Y.
Palanisamy, Kannan
Hinks, Jamie
Wuertz, Stefan
author_facet Han, Evelina J. Y.
Palanisamy, Kannan
Hinks, Jamie
Wuertz, Stefan
author_sort Han, Evelina J. Y.
collection PubMed
description Waterborne infections are responsible for health problems worldwide and their prompt and sensitive detection in recreational and potable water is of great importance. Bacterial identification and enumeration in water samples ensures water is safe for its intended use. Culture-based methods can be time consuming and are usually performed offsite. There is a need to for automated and distributed at-source detectors for water quality monitoring. Herein we demonstrate a microvolume Escherichia coli (E. coli) detector based on a screen printed electrode (SPE) bioelectroanalytical system and explore to what extent performance can be improved by coupling it with a filtration device. To confidently benchmark detector performance, we applied a statistical assessment method to target optimal detection of a simulated concentrated sample. Our aim was to arrive at a holistic understanding of device performance and to demonstrate system improvements based on these insights. The best achievable detection time for a simulated 1 CFU mL(−1) sample was 4.3 (±0.6) h assuming no loss of performance in the filtration step. The real filtered samples fell short of this, extending detection time to 16–18 h. The loss in performance is likely to arise from stress imposed by the filtration step which inhibited microbial growth rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6603592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66035922019-07-17 Parameter Selection for a Microvolume Electrochemical Escherichia coli Detector for Pairing with a Concentration Device Han, Evelina J. Y. Palanisamy, Kannan Hinks, Jamie Wuertz, Stefan Sensors (Basel) Article Waterborne infections are responsible for health problems worldwide and their prompt and sensitive detection in recreational and potable water is of great importance. Bacterial identification and enumeration in water samples ensures water is safe for its intended use. Culture-based methods can be time consuming and are usually performed offsite. There is a need to for automated and distributed at-source detectors for water quality monitoring. Herein we demonstrate a microvolume Escherichia coli (E. coli) detector based on a screen printed electrode (SPE) bioelectroanalytical system and explore to what extent performance can be improved by coupling it with a filtration device. To confidently benchmark detector performance, we applied a statistical assessment method to target optimal detection of a simulated concentrated sample. Our aim was to arrive at a holistic understanding of device performance and to demonstrate system improvements based on these insights. The best achievable detection time for a simulated 1 CFU mL(−1) sample was 4.3 (±0.6) h assuming no loss of performance in the filtration step. The real filtered samples fell short of this, extending detection time to 16–18 h. The loss in performance is likely to arise from stress imposed by the filtration step which inhibited microbial growth rates. MDPI 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6603592/ /pubmed/31141970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112437 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Han, Evelina J. Y.
Palanisamy, Kannan
Hinks, Jamie
Wuertz, Stefan
Parameter Selection for a Microvolume Electrochemical Escherichia coli Detector for Pairing with a Concentration Device
title Parameter Selection for a Microvolume Electrochemical Escherichia coli Detector for Pairing with a Concentration Device
title_full Parameter Selection for a Microvolume Electrochemical Escherichia coli Detector for Pairing with a Concentration Device
title_fullStr Parameter Selection for a Microvolume Electrochemical Escherichia coli Detector for Pairing with a Concentration Device
title_full_unstemmed Parameter Selection for a Microvolume Electrochemical Escherichia coli Detector for Pairing with a Concentration Device
title_short Parameter Selection for a Microvolume Electrochemical Escherichia coli Detector for Pairing with a Concentration Device
title_sort parameter selection for a microvolume electrochemical escherichia coli detector for pairing with a concentration device
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31141970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112437
work_keys_str_mv AT hanevelinajy parameterselectionforamicrovolumeelectrochemicalescherichiacolidetectorforpairingwithaconcentrationdevice
AT palanisamykannan parameterselectionforamicrovolumeelectrochemicalescherichiacolidetectorforpairingwithaconcentrationdevice
AT hinksjamie parameterselectionforamicrovolumeelectrochemicalescherichiacolidetectorforpairingwithaconcentrationdevice
AT wuertzstefan parameterselectionforamicrovolumeelectrochemicalescherichiacolidetectorforpairingwithaconcentrationdevice