Cargando…

Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus

The modalities currently employed to screen for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)/prediabetes are HbA1(c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hour plasma glucose (PG) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The purpose of this review is to highlight the positive qualities and pitfalls of these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brar, Preneet Cheema
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261470
http://dx.doi.org/10.6065/apem.2019.24.2.71
_version_ 1783431544186077184
author Brar, Preneet Cheema
author_facet Brar, Preneet Cheema
author_sort Brar, Preneet Cheema
collection PubMed
description The modalities currently employed to screen for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)/prediabetes are HbA1(c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hour plasma glucose (PG) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The purpose of this review is to highlight the positive qualities and pitfalls of these diagnostic modalities and reflect on the most reasonable and effective approach to screen high risk youth. Given its inherent preanalytical advantages, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1(c)) continues to be the preferred diagnostic modality used by pediatricians to screen high risk youth. However, when the three aforementioned tests are performed in youths of different races/ethnicities, discrepant results for T2DM/prediabetes are observed. The prevalence rates for T2DM vary from 0.53% in Chinese youth (including youth of all body mass indexes) to 18.3% in high-risk, overweight, obese Korean youth. Moreover, the FPG is abnormal (>100 less than <126 mg/dL) in 15% of Korean youth versus 8.7% of Chinese youth. The prevalence rates for prediabetes are 1.49% in Chinese youth versus 21% in Emirati youth (HbA1(c), 5.7%–6.4%). The coefficient of agreement, k, between these screening tests for T2DM are fair, 0.45–0.5 across all youth. However, using HbA1(c) as a comparator, the agreement is weak with FPG (k=0.18 in German youth versus k=0.396 in Korean youth). The American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care Guidelines define “high risk youth” who need to be tested for T2DM and/or prediabetes. OGTT and HbA1(c) do not always detect T2DM in similar individuals. HbA1(c) may not be an ideal test for screening Hispanic and African American youth. FPG and OGTT are suitable screening tests for youth of ethnic minorities and those with cystic fibrosis or hemoglobinopathies. Performing all three tests either together or sequentially may be the only way to encompass all youth who have aberrations in different aspects of glucose homeostasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6603607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66036072019-07-10 Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus Brar, Preneet Cheema Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab Review Article The modalities currently employed to screen for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)/prediabetes are HbA1(c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hour plasma glucose (PG) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The purpose of this review is to highlight the positive qualities and pitfalls of these diagnostic modalities and reflect on the most reasonable and effective approach to screen high risk youth. Given its inherent preanalytical advantages, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1(c)) continues to be the preferred diagnostic modality used by pediatricians to screen high risk youth. However, when the three aforementioned tests are performed in youths of different races/ethnicities, discrepant results for T2DM/prediabetes are observed. The prevalence rates for T2DM vary from 0.53% in Chinese youth (including youth of all body mass indexes) to 18.3% in high-risk, overweight, obese Korean youth. Moreover, the FPG is abnormal (>100 less than <126 mg/dL) in 15% of Korean youth versus 8.7% of Chinese youth. The prevalence rates for prediabetes are 1.49% in Chinese youth versus 21% in Emirati youth (HbA1(c), 5.7%–6.4%). The coefficient of agreement, k, between these screening tests for T2DM are fair, 0.45–0.5 across all youth. However, using HbA1(c) as a comparator, the agreement is weak with FPG (k=0.18 in German youth versus k=0.396 in Korean youth). The American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care Guidelines define “high risk youth” who need to be tested for T2DM and/or prediabetes. OGTT and HbA1(c) do not always detect T2DM in similar individuals. HbA1(c) may not be an ideal test for screening Hispanic and African American youth. FPG and OGTT are suitable screening tests for youth of ethnic minorities and those with cystic fibrosis or hemoglobinopathies. Performing all three tests either together or sequentially may be the only way to encompass all youth who have aberrations in different aspects of glucose homeostasis. Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology 2019-06 2019-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6603607/ /pubmed/31261470 http://dx.doi.org/10.6065/apem.2019.24.2.71 Text en © 2019 Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Brar, Preneet Cheema
Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_short Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261470
http://dx.doi.org/10.6065/apem.2019.24.2.71
work_keys_str_mv AT brarpreneetcheema updateonthecurrentmodalitiesusedtoscreenhighriskyouthforprediabetesandortype2diabetesmellitus