Cargando…

Biosensors—Publication Trends and Knowledge Domain Visualization

The number of scholarly publications on the topic of biosensors has increased rapidly; as a result, it is no longer easy to build an informed overview of the developments solely by manual means. Furthermore, with many new research results being continually published, it is useful to form an up-to-da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olson, Nasrine, Bae, Juhee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181820
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112615
_version_ 1783431562108338176
author Olson, Nasrine
Bae, Juhee
author_facet Olson, Nasrine
Bae, Juhee
author_sort Olson, Nasrine
collection PubMed
description The number of scholarly publications on the topic of biosensors has increased rapidly; as a result, it is no longer easy to build an informed overview of the developments solely by manual means. Furthermore, with many new research results being continually published, it is useful to form an up-to-date understanding of the recent trends or emergent directions in the field. This paper utilizes bibliometric methods to provide an overview of the developments in the topic based on scholarly publications. The results indicate an increasing interest in the topic of biosensor(s) with newly emerging sub-topics. The US is identified as the country with highest total contribution to this area, but as a collective, EU countries top the list of total contributions. An examination of trends over the years indicates that in recent years, China-based authors have been more productive in this area. If research contribution per capita is considered, Singapore takes the top position, followed by Sweden, Switzerland and Denmark. While the number of publications on biosensors seems to have declined in recent years in the PubMed database, this is not the case in the Web of Science database. However, there remains an indication that the rate of growth in the more recent years is slowing. This paper also presents a comparison of the developments in publications on biosensors with the full set of publications in two of the main journals in the field. In more recent publications, synthetic biology, smartphone, fluorescent biosensor, and point-of-care testing are among the terms that have received more attention. The study also identifies the top authors and journals in the field, and concludes with a summary and suggestions for follow up research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6603684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66036842019-07-17 Biosensors—Publication Trends and Knowledge Domain Visualization Olson, Nasrine Bae, Juhee Sensors (Basel) Article The number of scholarly publications on the topic of biosensors has increased rapidly; as a result, it is no longer easy to build an informed overview of the developments solely by manual means. Furthermore, with many new research results being continually published, it is useful to form an up-to-date understanding of the recent trends or emergent directions in the field. This paper utilizes bibliometric methods to provide an overview of the developments in the topic based on scholarly publications. The results indicate an increasing interest in the topic of biosensor(s) with newly emerging sub-topics. The US is identified as the country with highest total contribution to this area, but as a collective, EU countries top the list of total contributions. An examination of trends over the years indicates that in recent years, China-based authors have been more productive in this area. If research contribution per capita is considered, Singapore takes the top position, followed by Sweden, Switzerland and Denmark. While the number of publications on biosensors seems to have declined in recent years in the PubMed database, this is not the case in the Web of Science database. However, there remains an indication that the rate of growth in the more recent years is slowing. This paper also presents a comparison of the developments in publications on biosensors with the full set of publications in two of the main journals in the field. In more recent publications, synthetic biology, smartphone, fluorescent biosensor, and point-of-care testing are among the terms that have received more attention. The study also identifies the top authors and journals in the field, and concludes with a summary and suggestions for follow up research. MDPI 2019-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6603684/ /pubmed/31181820 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112615 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Olson, Nasrine
Bae, Juhee
Biosensors—Publication Trends and Knowledge Domain Visualization
title Biosensors—Publication Trends and Knowledge Domain Visualization
title_full Biosensors—Publication Trends and Knowledge Domain Visualization
title_fullStr Biosensors—Publication Trends and Knowledge Domain Visualization
title_full_unstemmed Biosensors—Publication Trends and Knowledge Domain Visualization
title_short Biosensors—Publication Trends and Knowledge Domain Visualization
title_sort biosensors—publication trends and knowledge domain visualization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181820
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112615
work_keys_str_mv AT olsonnasrine biosensorspublicationtrendsandknowledgedomainvisualization
AT baejuhee biosensorspublicationtrendsandknowledgedomainvisualization