Cargando…
Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review
With the growing interest in daily activity monitoring, several insole designs have been developed to identify postures, detect activities, and count steps. However, the validity of these devices is not clearly established. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the available informatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31141973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112438 |
_version_ | 1783431577083052032 |
---|---|
author | Ngueleu, Armelle M. Blanchette, Andréanne K. Maltais, Désirée Moffet, Hélène McFadyen, Bradford J. Bouyer, Laurent Batcho, Charles S. |
author_facet | Ngueleu, Armelle M. Blanchette, Andréanne K. Maltais, Désirée Moffet, Hélène McFadyen, Bradford J. Bouyer, Laurent Batcho, Charles S. |
author_sort | Ngueleu, Armelle M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the growing interest in daily activity monitoring, several insole designs have been developed to identify postures, detect activities, and count steps. However, the validity of these devices is not clearly established. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the available information on the criterion validity of instrumented insoles in detecting postures activities and steps. The literature search through six databases led to 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated 17 different insole models and involved 290 participants from 16 to 75 years old. Criterion validity was assessed using six statistical indicators. For posture and activity recognition, accuracy varied from 75.0% to 100%, precision from 65.8% to 100%, specificity from 98.1% to 100%, sensitivity from 73.0% to 100%, and identification rate from 66.2% to 100%. For step counting, accuracies were very high (94.8% to 100%). Across studies, different postures and activities were assessed using different criterion validity indicators, leading to heterogeneous results. Instrumented insoles appeared to be highly accurate for steps counting. However, measurement properties were variable for posture and activity recognition. These findings call for a standardized methodology to investigate the measurement properties of such devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6603748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66037482019-07-17 Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review Ngueleu, Armelle M. Blanchette, Andréanne K. Maltais, Désirée Moffet, Hélène McFadyen, Bradford J. Bouyer, Laurent Batcho, Charles S. Sensors (Basel) Review With the growing interest in daily activity monitoring, several insole designs have been developed to identify postures, detect activities, and count steps. However, the validity of these devices is not clearly established. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the available information on the criterion validity of instrumented insoles in detecting postures activities and steps. The literature search through six databases led to 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated 17 different insole models and involved 290 participants from 16 to 75 years old. Criterion validity was assessed using six statistical indicators. For posture and activity recognition, accuracy varied from 75.0% to 100%, precision from 65.8% to 100%, specificity from 98.1% to 100%, sensitivity from 73.0% to 100%, and identification rate from 66.2% to 100%. For step counting, accuracies were very high (94.8% to 100%). Across studies, different postures and activities were assessed using different criterion validity indicators, leading to heterogeneous results. Instrumented insoles appeared to be highly accurate for steps counting. However, measurement properties were variable for posture and activity recognition. These findings call for a standardized methodology to investigate the measurement properties of such devices. MDPI 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6603748/ /pubmed/31141973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112438 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ngueleu, Armelle M. Blanchette, Andréanne K. Maltais, Désirée Moffet, Hélène McFadyen, Bradford J. Bouyer, Laurent Batcho, Charles S. Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review |
title | Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | validity of instrumented insoles for step counting, posture and activity recognition: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31141973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngueleuarmellem validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview AT blanchetteandreannek validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview AT maltaisdesiree validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview AT moffethelene validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview AT mcfadyenbradfordj validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview AT bouyerlaurent validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview AT batchocharless validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview |