Cargando…

Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review

With the growing interest in daily activity monitoring, several insole designs have been developed to identify postures, detect activities, and count steps. However, the validity of these devices is not clearly established. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the available informatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ngueleu, Armelle M., Blanchette, Andréanne K., Maltais, Désirée, Moffet, Hélène, McFadyen, Bradford J., Bouyer, Laurent, Batcho, Charles S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31141973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112438
_version_ 1783431577083052032
author Ngueleu, Armelle M.
Blanchette, Andréanne K.
Maltais, Désirée
Moffet, Hélène
McFadyen, Bradford J.
Bouyer, Laurent
Batcho, Charles S.
author_facet Ngueleu, Armelle M.
Blanchette, Andréanne K.
Maltais, Désirée
Moffet, Hélène
McFadyen, Bradford J.
Bouyer, Laurent
Batcho, Charles S.
author_sort Ngueleu, Armelle M.
collection PubMed
description With the growing interest in daily activity monitoring, several insole designs have been developed to identify postures, detect activities, and count steps. However, the validity of these devices is not clearly established. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the available information on the criterion validity of instrumented insoles in detecting postures activities and steps. The literature search through six databases led to 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated 17 different insole models and involved 290 participants from 16 to 75 years old. Criterion validity was assessed using six statistical indicators. For posture and activity recognition, accuracy varied from 75.0% to 100%, precision from 65.8% to 100%, specificity from 98.1% to 100%, sensitivity from 73.0% to 100%, and identification rate from 66.2% to 100%. For step counting, accuracies were very high (94.8% to 100%). Across studies, different postures and activities were assessed using different criterion validity indicators, leading to heterogeneous results. Instrumented insoles appeared to be highly accurate for steps counting. However, measurement properties were variable for posture and activity recognition. These findings call for a standardized methodology to investigate the measurement properties of such devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6603748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66037482019-07-17 Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review Ngueleu, Armelle M. Blanchette, Andréanne K. Maltais, Désirée Moffet, Hélène McFadyen, Bradford J. Bouyer, Laurent Batcho, Charles S. Sensors (Basel) Review With the growing interest in daily activity monitoring, several insole designs have been developed to identify postures, detect activities, and count steps. However, the validity of these devices is not clearly established. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the available information on the criterion validity of instrumented insoles in detecting postures activities and steps. The literature search through six databases led to 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated 17 different insole models and involved 290 participants from 16 to 75 years old. Criterion validity was assessed using six statistical indicators. For posture and activity recognition, accuracy varied from 75.0% to 100%, precision from 65.8% to 100%, specificity from 98.1% to 100%, sensitivity from 73.0% to 100%, and identification rate from 66.2% to 100%. For step counting, accuracies were very high (94.8% to 100%). Across studies, different postures and activities were assessed using different criterion validity indicators, leading to heterogeneous results. Instrumented insoles appeared to be highly accurate for steps counting. However, measurement properties were variable for posture and activity recognition. These findings call for a standardized methodology to investigate the measurement properties of such devices. MDPI 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6603748/ /pubmed/31141973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112438 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ngueleu, Armelle M.
Blanchette, Andréanne K.
Maltais, Désirée
Moffet, Hélène
McFadyen, Bradford J.
Bouyer, Laurent
Batcho, Charles S.
Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review
title Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review
title_full Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review
title_short Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review
title_sort validity of instrumented insoles for step counting, posture and activity recognition: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31141973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112438
work_keys_str_mv AT ngueleuarmellem validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview
AT blanchetteandreannek validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview
AT maltaisdesiree validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview
AT moffethelene validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview
AT mcfadyenbradfordj validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview
AT bouyerlaurent validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview
AT batchocharless validityofinstrumentedinsolesforstepcountingpostureandactivityrecognitionasystematicreview