Cargando…

Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking

Functional electrical stimulation systems are used as neuroprosthetic devices in rehabilitative interventions such as gait training. Stimulator triggers, implemented to control stimulation delivery, range from open- to closed-loop controllers. Finite-state controllers trigger stimulators when specif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zahradka, Nicole, Behboodi, Ahad, Wright, Henry, Bodt, Barry, Lee, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112471
_version_ 1783431584481804288
author Zahradka, Nicole
Behboodi, Ahad
Wright, Henry
Bodt, Barry
Lee, Samuel
author_facet Zahradka, Nicole
Behboodi, Ahad
Wright, Henry
Bodt, Barry
Lee, Samuel
author_sort Zahradka, Nicole
collection PubMed
description Functional electrical stimulation systems are used as neuroprosthetic devices in rehabilitative interventions such as gait training. Stimulator triggers, implemented to control stimulation delivery, range from open- to closed-loop controllers. Finite-state controllers trigger stimulators when specific conditions are met and utilize preset sequences of stimulation. Wearable sensors provide the necessary input to differentiate gait phases during walking and trigger stimulation. However, gait phase detection is associated with inherent system delays. In this study, five stimulator triggers designed to compensate for gait phase detection delays were tested to determine which trigger most accurately delivered stimulation at the desired times of the gait cycle. Motion capture data were collected on seven typically-developing children while walking on an instrumented treadmill. Participants wore one inertial measurement unit on each ankle and gyroscope data were streamed into the gait phase detection algorithm. Five triggers, based on gait phase detection, were used to simulate stimulation to five muscle groups, bilaterally. For each condition, stimulation signals were collected in the motion capture software via analog channels and compared to the desired timing determined by kinematic and kinetic data. Results illustrate that gait phase detection is a viable finite-state control, and appropriate system delay compensations, on average, reduce stimulation delivery delays by 6.7% of the gait cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6603781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66037812019-07-17 Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking Zahradka, Nicole Behboodi, Ahad Wright, Henry Bodt, Barry Lee, Samuel Sensors (Basel) Article Functional electrical stimulation systems are used as neuroprosthetic devices in rehabilitative interventions such as gait training. Stimulator triggers, implemented to control stimulation delivery, range from open- to closed-loop controllers. Finite-state controllers trigger stimulators when specific conditions are met and utilize preset sequences of stimulation. Wearable sensors provide the necessary input to differentiate gait phases during walking and trigger stimulation. However, gait phase detection is associated with inherent system delays. In this study, five stimulator triggers designed to compensate for gait phase detection delays were tested to determine which trigger most accurately delivered stimulation at the desired times of the gait cycle. Motion capture data were collected on seven typically-developing children while walking on an instrumented treadmill. Participants wore one inertial measurement unit on each ankle and gyroscope data were streamed into the gait phase detection algorithm. Five triggers, based on gait phase detection, were used to simulate stimulation to five muscle groups, bilaterally. For each condition, stimulation signals were collected in the motion capture software via analog channels and compared to the desired timing determined by kinematic and kinetic data. Results illustrate that gait phase detection is a viable finite-state control, and appropriate system delay compensations, on average, reduce stimulation delivery delays by 6.7% of the gait cycle. MDPI 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6603781/ /pubmed/31151183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112471 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zahradka, Nicole
Behboodi, Ahad
Wright, Henry
Bodt, Barry
Lee, Samuel
Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking
title Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking
title_full Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking
title_fullStr Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking
title_short Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking
title_sort evaluation of gait phase detection delay compensation strategies to control a gyroscope-controlled functional electrical stimulation system during walking
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112471
work_keys_str_mv AT zahradkanicole evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking
AT behboodiahad evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking
AT wrighthenry evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking
AT bodtbarry evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking
AT leesamuel evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking