Cargando…
Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking
Functional electrical stimulation systems are used as neuroprosthetic devices in rehabilitative interventions such as gait training. Stimulator triggers, implemented to control stimulation delivery, range from open- to closed-loop controllers. Finite-state controllers trigger stimulators when specif...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112471 |
_version_ | 1783431584481804288 |
---|---|
author | Zahradka, Nicole Behboodi, Ahad Wright, Henry Bodt, Barry Lee, Samuel |
author_facet | Zahradka, Nicole Behboodi, Ahad Wright, Henry Bodt, Barry Lee, Samuel |
author_sort | Zahradka, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | Functional electrical stimulation systems are used as neuroprosthetic devices in rehabilitative interventions such as gait training. Stimulator triggers, implemented to control stimulation delivery, range from open- to closed-loop controllers. Finite-state controllers trigger stimulators when specific conditions are met and utilize preset sequences of stimulation. Wearable sensors provide the necessary input to differentiate gait phases during walking and trigger stimulation. However, gait phase detection is associated with inherent system delays. In this study, five stimulator triggers designed to compensate for gait phase detection delays were tested to determine which trigger most accurately delivered stimulation at the desired times of the gait cycle. Motion capture data were collected on seven typically-developing children while walking on an instrumented treadmill. Participants wore one inertial measurement unit on each ankle and gyroscope data were streamed into the gait phase detection algorithm. Five triggers, based on gait phase detection, were used to simulate stimulation to five muscle groups, bilaterally. For each condition, stimulation signals were collected in the motion capture software via analog channels and compared to the desired timing determined by kinematic and kinetic data. Results illustrate that gait phase detection is a viable finite-state control, and appropriate system delay compensations, on average, reduce stimulation delivery delays by 6.7% of the gait cycle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6603781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66037812019-07-17 Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking Zahradka, Nicole Behboodi, Ahad Wright, Henry Bodt, Barry Lee, Samuel Sensors (Basel) Article Functional electrical stimulation systems are used as neuroprosthetic devices in rehabilitative interventions such as gait training. Stimulator triggers, implemented to control stimulation delivery, range from open- to closed-loop controllers. Finite-state controllers trigger stimulators when specific conditions are met and utilize preset sequences of stimulation. Wearable sensors provide the necessary input to differentiate gait phases during walking and trigger stimulation. However, gait phase detection is associated with inherent system delays. In this study, five stimulator triggers designed to compensate for gait phase detection delays were tested to determine which trigger most accurately delivered stimulation at the desired times of the gait cycle. Motion capture data were collected on seven typically-developing children while walking on an instrumented treadmill. Participants wore one inertial measurement unit on each ankle and gyroscope data were streamed into the gait phase detection algorithm. Five triggers, based on gait phase detection, were used to simulate stimulation to five muscle groups, bilaterally. For each condition, stimulation signals were collected in the motion capture software via analog channels and compared to the desired timing determined by kinematic and kinetic data. Results illustrate that gait phase detection is a viable finite-state control, and appropriate system delay compensations, on average, reduce stimulation delivery delays by 6.7% of the gait cycle. MDPI 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6603781/ /pubmed/31151183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112471 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zahradka, Nicole Behboodi, Ahad Wright, Henry Bodt, Barry Lee, Samuel Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking |
title | Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking |
title_full | Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking |
title_short | Evaluation of Gait Phase Detection Delay Compensation Strategies to Control a Gyroscope-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System During Walking |
title_sort | evaluation of gait phase detection delay compensation strategies to control a gyroscope-controlled functional electrical stimulation system during walking |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19112471 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zahradkanicole evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking AT behboodiahad evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking AT wrighthenry evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking AT bodtbarry evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking AT leesamuel evaluationofgaitphasedetectiondelaycompensationstrategiestocontrolagyroscopecontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationsystemduringwalking |