Cargando…
Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps
Background: Penile compression devices (PCD) or clamps are applied to compress the urethra and prevent urinary incontinence (UI). PCDs are more secure and less likely to leak than pads, allowing men the opportunity to participate in short-term, vigorous activities. However, they are uncomfortable, c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303800 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S188888 |
_version_ | 1783431626756194304 |
---|---|
author | Lemmens, Joseph MH Broadbridge, Jackie Macaulay, Margaret Rees, Rowland W Archer, Matt Drake, Marcus J Moore, Katherine N Bader, Dan L Fader, Mandy |
author_facet | Lemmens, Joseph MH Broadbridge, Jackie Macaulay, Margaret Rees, Rowland W Archer, Matt Drake, Marcus J Moore, Katherine N Bader, Dan L Fader, Mandy |
author_sort | Lemmens, Joseph MH |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Penile compression devices (PCD) or clamps are applied to compress the urethra and prevent urinary incontinence (UI). PCDs are more secure and less likely to leak than pads, allowing men the opportunity to participate in short-term, vigorous activities. However, they are uncomfortable, can cause pressure ulcers (PU) and affect penile blood flow. No objective assessment of tissue health has been undertaken to assess and compare different PCD designs and to provide guidance on safe use. Objective: This study was designed to evaluate existing PCDs in terms of their physiological response and potential for pressure-induced injury. Design, setting and participants: Six men with post-prostatectomy UI tested four selected PCDs at effective pressures, in a random order, in a controlled laboratory setting. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Using objective methods for assessing skin injury, PCDs were measured in situ for their effects on circulatory impedance, interface pressures and inflammatory response. Results and limitations: There was evidence for PCD-induced circulatory impedance in most test conditions. Interface pressures varied considerably between both PCDs and participants, with a mean value of 137.4±69.7 mmHg. In some cases, penile skin was noted to be sensitive to loading with elevated concentration of the cytokine IL-1α after 10 mins wear, indicating an inflammatory response. IL-1α levels were restored to baseline 40 mins following PCD removal. Conclusion: Skin health measures indicated tissue and blood flow compromise during the 50 mins of testing using all PCDs. Although there was an elevation in pro-inflammatory cytokines, PCDs did not cause sustained irritation and skin health measures recovered 40 mins after PCD removal. This research indicates that application of a clamp for one hour with an equal clamp free time before reapplication is likely to be safe. Longer periods are often recommended by manufacturers but have yet to be tested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6603992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66039922019-07-12 Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps Lemmens, Joseph MH Broadbridge, Jackie Macaulay, Margaret Rees, Rowland W Archer, Matt Drake, Marcus J Moore, Katherine N Bader, Dan L Fader, Mandy Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research Background: Penile compression devices (PCD) or clamps are applied to compress the urethra and prevent urinary incontinence (UI). PCDs are more secure and less likely to leak than pads, allowing men the opportunity to participate in short-term, vigorous activities. However, they are uncomfortable, can cause pressure ulcers (PU) and affect penile blood flow. No objective assessment of tissue health has been undertaken to assess and compare different PCD designs and to provide guidance on safe use. Objective: This study was designed to evaluate existing PCDs in terms of their physiological response and potential for pressure-induced injury. Design, setting and participants: Six men with post-prostatectomy UI tested four selected PCDs at effective pressures, in a random order, in a controlled laboratory setting. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Using objective methods for assessing skin injury, PCDs were measured in situ for their effects on circulatory impedance, interface pressures and inflammatory response. Results and limitations: There was evidence for PCD-induced circulatory impedance in most test conditions. Interface pressures varied considerably between both PCDs and participants, with a mean value of 137.4±69.7 mmHg. In some cases, penile skin was noted to be sensitive to loading with elevated concentration of the cytokine IL-1α after 10 mins wear, indicating an inflammatory response. IL-1α levels were restored to baseline 40 mins following PCD removal. Conclusion: Skin health measures indicated tissue and blood flow compromise during the 50 mins of testing using all PCDs. Although there was an elevation in pro-inflammatory cytokines, PCDs did not cause sustained irritation and skin health measures recovered 40 mins after PCD removal. This research indicates that application of a clamp for one hour with an equal clamp free time before reapplication is likely to be safe. Longer periods are often recommended by manufacturers but have yet to be tested. Dove 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6603992/ /pubmed/31303800 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S188888 Text en © 2019 Lemmens et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lemmens, Joseph MH Broadbridge, Jackie Macaulay, Margaret Rees, Rowland W Archer, Matt Drake, Marcus J Moore, Katherine N Bader, Dan L Fader, Mandy Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps |
title | Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps |
title_full | Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps |
title_fullStr | Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps |
title_full_unstemmed | Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps |
title_short | Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps |
title_sort | tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6603992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303800 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S188888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lemmensjosephmh tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps AT broadbridgejackie tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps AT macaulaymargaret tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps AT reesrowlandw tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps AT archermatt tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps AT drakemarcusj tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps AT moorekatherinen tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps AT baderdanl tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps AT fadermandy tissueresponsetoappliedloadingusingdifferentdesignsofpenilecompressionclamps |