Cargando…
Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds
BACKGROUND: Endoparasites are considered a major health problem of South American camelids as shown in a recent survey among German and Austrian camelid owners. Although prophylactic and therapeutic measures such as application of anthelmintics are commonly used, treatment efficacy is usually not as...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31266521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3588-3 |
_version_ | 1783431664287875072 |
---|---|
author | Kultscher, Luise Hinney, Barbara Schmäschke, Ronald Joachim, Anja Wittek, Thomas |
author_facet | Kultscher, Luise Hinney, Barbara Schmäschke, Ronald Joachim, Anja Wittek, Thomas |
author_sort | Kultscher, Luise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoparasites are considered a major health problem of South American camelids as shown in a recent survey among German and Austrian camelid owners. Although prophylactic and therapeutic measures such as application of anthelmintics are commonly used, treatment efficacy is usually not assessed. Owners have expressed significant concerns regarding the effect of antiparasitic therapy, so this study aimed to evaluate the outcome of anthelmintic treatment in German alpaca herds with different drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 617 samples from 538 clinically healthy alpacas > 1 year-old from 27 farms (n = 11–157 animals/herd) were examined. The most common parasites detected by flotation were Eimeria spp. (75.1%) followed by strongylids (55.0%), Nematodirus spp. (19.3%), cestodes (3.1%) and Trichuris (2.7%). After initial coproscopical examination by flotation and strongylid egg quantification by the McMaster technique, positive animals excreting at least 150 eggs per gram of faeces were included in a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) using fenbendazole (n = 71 samples), moxidectin (n = 71) or monepantel (n = 66). Pre-treatment larval cultures (n = 23 positive pooled farm samples) revealed Haemonchus (87% of the farms), Cooperia (43.5%), Trichostrongylus (21.7%), Ostertagia (13.0%), Nematodirus and Oesophagostomum (4.3% each). Fenbendazole treatment reduced egg excretion by 45%, moxidectin by 91% and monepantel by 96%. On the farm level, 13/18 farms that used fenbendazole, 6/6 farms that used moxidectin and 2/5 farms that used monepantel had individual FECR values < 90% (fenbendazole) or < 95% (moxidectin, monepantel). Haemonchus and Cooperia were overrepresented on the farms with reduced treatment efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal strongylids are common in German alpacas and fenbendazole in particular was not sufficiently effective to reduce strongylid egg excretion. Although the FECRT could not unambiguously determine anthelmintic resistance in the present study, the finding that small ruminant strongylids, especially Haemonchus, are common in alpacas indicates that determination of effective anthelmintic doses, monitoring of efficacy and adapted (selective) treatment regimens must be implemented as part of sustainable deworming practices in this species in accordance with recommendations for ruminants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6604192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66041922019-07-12 Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds Kultscher, Luise Hinney, Barbara Schmäschke, Ronald Joachim, Anja Wittek, Thomas Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Endoparasites are considered a major health problem of South American camelids as shown in a recent survey among German and Austrian camelid owners. Although prophylactic and therapeutic measures such as application of anthelmintics are commonly used, treatment efficacy is usually not assessed. Owners have expressed significant concerns regarding the effect of antiparasitic therapy, so this study aimed to evaluate the outcome of anthelmintic treatment in German alpaca herds with different drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 617 samples from 538 clinically healthy alpacas > 1 year-old from 27 farms (n = 11–157 animals/herd) were examined. The most common parasites detected by flotation were Eimeria spp. (75.1%) followed by strongylids (55.0%), Nematodirus spp. (19.3%), cestodes (3.1%) and Trichuris (2.7%). After initial coproscopical examination by flotation and strongylid egg quantification by the McMaster technique, positive animals excreting at least 150 eggs per gram of faeces were included in a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) using fenbendazole (n = 71 samples), moxidectin (n = 71) or monepantel (n = 66). Pre-treatment larval cultures (n = 23 positive pooled farm samples) revealed Haemonchus (87% of the farms), Cooperia (43.5%), Trichostrongylus (21.7%), Ostertagia (13.0%), Nematodirus and Oesophagostomum (4.3% each). Fenbendazole treatment reduced egg excretion by 45%, moxidectin by 91% and monepantel by 96%. On the farm level, 13/18 farms that used fenbendazole, 6/6 farms that used moxidectin and 2/5 farms that used monepantel had individual FECR values < 90% (fenbendazole) or < 95% (moxidectin, monepantel). Haemonchus and Cooperia were overrepresented on the farms with reduced treatment efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal strongylids are common in German alpacas and fenbendazole in particular was not sufficiently effective to reduce strongylid egg excretion. Although the FECRT could not unambiguously determine anthelmintic resistance in the present study, the finding that small ruminant strongylids, especially Haemonchus, are common in alpacas indicates that determination of effective anthelmintic doses, monitoring of efficacy and adapted (selective) treatment regimens must be implemented as part of sustainable deworming practices in this species in accordance with recommendations for ruminants. BioMed Central 2019-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6604192/ /pubmed/31266521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3588-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kultscher, Luise Hinney, Barbara Schmäschke, Ronald Joachim, Anja Wittek, Thomas Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds |
title | Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds |
title_full | Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds |
title_fullStr | Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds |
title_full_unstemmed | Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds |
title_short | Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds |
title_sort | current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in german alpaca herds |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31266521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3588-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kultscherluise currentanthelmintictreatmentisnotalwayseffectiveatcontrollingstrongylidinfectionsingermanalpacaherds AT hinneybarbara currentanthelmintictreatmentisnotalwayseffectiveatcontrollingstrongylidinfectionsingermanalpacaherds AT schmaschkeronald currentanthelmintictreatmentisnotalwayseffectiveatcontrollingstrongylidinfectionsingermanalpacaherds AT joachimanja currentanthelmintictreatmentisnotalwayseffectiveatcontrollingstrongylidinfectionsingermanalpacaherds AT wittekthomas currentanthelmintictreatmentisnotalwayseffectiveatcontrollingstrongylidinfectionsingermanalpacaherds |