Cargando…
Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Clinical studies assessing the feasibility and accuracy of three stone scoring systems’s (SSSs: Guy’s stone score, CROES nomogram and S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scoring system) have reported contradictory outcomes. This systematic evaluation was performed to obtain comprehensive evidence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31262284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0488-y |
_version_ | 1783431665950916608 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Kehua Sun, Fa Zhu, Jianguo Luo, Guangheng Zhang, Peng Ban, Yong Shan, Gang Liu, Changxiang |
author_facet | Jiang, Kehua Sun, Fa Zhu, Jianguo Luo, Guangheng Zhang, Peng Ban, Yong Shan, Gang Liu, Changxiang |
author_sort | Jiang, Kehua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical studies assessing the feasibility and accuracy of three stone scoring systems’s (SSSs: Guy’s stone score, CROES nomogram and S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scoring system) have reported contradictory outcomes. This systematic evaluation was performed to obtain comprehensive evidence with regard to the feasibility and accuracy of three SSSs. METHODS: A systematic search of Embase, Pubmed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies that compared three SSSs up to Mar 2018. Patients were categorized according to stone free (SF) and no-stone free (NSF), Outcomes of interest included perioperative variables, stone-free rate (SFR), and complications. RESULTS: Ten studies estimating three SSSs were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that SF patients had a significantly lower proportion of male (OR = 1.48, P = 0.0007), lower stone burden (WMD = -504.28, P < 0.0001), fewer No of involved calyces (OR = -1.23, P = 0.0007) and lower proportion of staghorn stone (OR = 0.33, P < 0.0001). Moreover, SF patients had significantly lower score of Guy score (WMD = -0.64, P < 0.0001), but, S.T.O.N.E. score (WMD = -1.23, P < 0.0001) and a higher score of CROES nomogram (WMD = 29.48, P = 0.003). However, the comparison of area under curves (AUC) of predicting SFR indicated that there was no remarkable difference between three SSSs. Nonetheless, Guy score was the only stone scoring system that predicted complications after PCNL (WMD = -0.29, 95% CI: − 0.57 to − 0.02, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicated that the three SSSs were equally, feasible and accurate for predicting SFR after PCNL. However, Guy score was the only stone scoring system that predicted complications after PCNL. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-019-0488-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6604199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66041992019-07-12 Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Jiang, Kehua Sun, Fa Zhu, Jianguo Luo, Guangheng Zhang, Peng Ban, Yong Shan, Gang Liu, Changxiang BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical studies assessing the feasibility and accuracy of three stone scoring systems’s (SSSs: Guy’s stone score, CROES nomogram and S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scoring system) have reported contradictory outcomes. This systematic evaluation was performed to obtain comprehensive evidence with regard to the feasibility and accuracy of three SSSs. METHODS: A systematic search of Embase, Pubmed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies that compared three SSSs up to Mar 2018. Patients were categorized according to stone free (SF) and no-stone free (NSF), Outcomes of interest included perioperative variables, stone-free rate (SFR), and complications. RESULTS: Ten studies estimating three SSSs were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that SF patients had a significantly lower proportion of male (OR = 1.48, P = 0.0007), lower stone burden (WMD = -504.28, P < 0.0001), fewer No of involved calyces (OR = -1.23, P = 0.0007) and lower proportion of staghorn stone (OR = 0.33, P < 0.0001). Moreover, SF patients had significantly lower score of Guy score (WMD = -0.64, P < 0.0001), but, S.T.O.N.E. score (WMD = -1.23, P < 0.0001) and a higher score of CROES nomogram (WMD = 29.48, P = 0.003). However, the comparison of area under curves (AUC) of predicting SFR indicated that there was no remarkable difference between three SSSs. Nonetheless, Guy score was the only stone scoring system that predicted complications after PCNL (WMD = -0.29, 95% CI: − 0.57 to − 0.02, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicated that the three SSSs were equally, feasible and accurate for predicting SFR after PCNL. However, Guy score was the only stone scoring system that predicted complications after PCNL. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-019-0488-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6604199/ /pubmed/31262284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0488-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jiang, Kehua Sun, Fa Zhu, Jianguo Luo, Guangheng Zhang, Peng Ban, Yong Shan, Gang Liu, Changxiang Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting sfr and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31262284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0488-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangkehua evaluationofthreestonescoringsystemsforpredictingsfrandcomplicationsafterpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunfa evaluationofthreestonescoringsystemsforpredictingsfrandcomplicationsafterpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhujianguo evaluationofthreestonescoringsystemsforpredictingsfrandcomplicationsafterpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luoguangheng evaluationofthreestonescoringsystemsforpredictingsfrandcomplicationsafterpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangpeng evaluationofthreestonescoringsystemsforpredictingsfrandcomplicationsafterpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT banyong evaluationofthreestonescoringsystemsforpredictingsfrandcomplicationsafterpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shangang evaluationofthreestonescoringsystemsforpredictingsfrandcomplicationsafterpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuchangxiang evaluationofthreestonescoringsystemsforpredictingsfrandcomplicationsafterpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |