Cargando…
Genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs): challenges and guidelines
BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are in vivo models of human cancer that have been used for translational cancer research and therapy selection for individual patients. The Jackson Laboratory (JAX) PDX resource comprises 455 models originating from 34 different primary sites (as of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31262303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-019-0551-2 |
_version_ | 1783431667364397056 |
---|---|
author | Woo, Xing Yi Srivastava, Anuj Graber, Joel H. Yadav, Vinod Sarsani, Vishal Kumar Simons, Al Beane, Glen Grubb, Stephen Ananda, Guruprasad Liu, Rangjiao Stafford, Grace Chuang, Jeffrey H. Airhart, Susan D. Karuturi, R. Krishna Murthy George, Joshy Bult, Carol J. |
author_facet | Woo, Xing Yi Srivastava, Anuj Graber, Joel H. Yadav, Vinod Sarsani, Vishal Kumar Simons, Al Beane, Glen Grubb, Stephen Ananda, Guruprasad Liu, Rangjiao Stafford, Grace Chuang, Jeffrey H. Airhart, Susan D. Karuturi, R. Krishna Murthy George, Joshy Bult, Carol J. |
author_sort | Woo, Xing Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are in vivo models of human cancer that have been used for translational cancer research and therapy selection for individual patients. The Jackson Laboratory (JAX) PDX resource comprises 455 models originating from 34 different primary sites (as of 05/08/2019). The models undergo rigorous quality control and are genomically characterized to identify somatic mutations, copy number alterations, and transcriptional profiles. Bioinformatics workflows for analyzing genomic data obtained from human tumors engrafted in a mouse host (i.e., Patient-Derived Xenografts; PDXs) must address challenges such as discriminating between mouse and human sequence reads and accurately identifying somatic mutations and copy number alterations when paired non-tumor DNA from the patient is not available for comparison. RESULTS: We report here data analysis workflows and guidelines that address these challenges and achieve reliable identification of somatic mutations, copy number alterations, and transcriptomic profiles of tumors from PDX models that lack genomic data from paired non-tumor tissue for comparison. Our workflows incorporate commonly used software and public databases but are tailored to address the specific challenges of PDX genomics data analysis through parameter tuning and customized data filters and result in improved accuracy for the detection of somatic alterations in PDX models. We also report a gene expression-based classifier that can identify EBV-transformed tumors. We validated our analytical approaches using data simulations and demonstrated the overall concordance of the genomic properties of xenograft tumors with data from primary human tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis workflows that we have developed to accurately predict somatic profiles of tumors from PDX models that lack normal tissue for comparison enable the identification of the key oncogenic genomic and expression signatures to support model selection and/or biomarker development in therapeutic studies. A reference implementation of our analysis recommendations is available at https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/PDX-Analysis-Workflows. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12920-019-0551-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6604205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66042052019-07-12 Genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs): challenges and guidelines Woo, Xing Yi Srivastava, Anuj Graber, Joel H. Yadav, Vinod Sarsani, Vishal Kumar Simons, Al Beane, Glen Grubb, Stephen Ananda, Guruprasad Liu, Rangjiao Stafford, Grace Chuang, Jeffrey H. Airhart, Susan D. Karuturi, R. Krishna Murthy George, Joshy Bult, Carol J. BMC Med Genomics Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are in vivo models of human cancer that have been used for translational cancer research and therapy selection for individual patients. The Jackson Laboratory (JAX) PDX resource comprises 455 models originating from 34 different primary sites (as of 05/08/2019). The models undergo rigorous quality control and are genomically characterized to identify somatic mutations, copy number alterations, and transcriptional profiles. Bioinformatics workflows for analyzing genomic data obtained from human tumors engrafted in a mouse host (i.e., Patient-Derived Xenografts; PDXs) must address challenges such as discriminating between mouse and human sequence reads and accurately identifying somatic mutations and copy number alterations when paired non-tumor DNA from the patient is not available for comparison. RESULTS: We report here data analysis workflows and guidelines that address these challenges and achieve reliable identification of somatic mutations, copy number alterations, and transcriptomic profiles of tumors from PDX models that lack genomic data from paired non-tumor tissue for comparison. Our workflows incorporate commonly used software and public databases but are tailored to address the specific challenges of PDX genomics data analysis through parameter tuning and customized data filters and result in improved accuracy for the detection of somatic alterations in PDX models. We also report a gene expression-based classifier that can identify EBV-transformed tumors. We validated our analytical approaches using data simulations and demonstrated the overall concordance of the genomic properties of xenograft tumors with data from primary human tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis workflows that we have developed to accurately predict somatic profiles of tumors from PDX models that lack normal tissue for comparison enable the identification of the key oncogenic genomic and expression signatures to support model selection and/or biomarker development in therapeutic studies. A reference implementation of our analysis recommendations is available at https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/PDX-Analysis-Workflows. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12920-019-0551-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6604205/ /pubmed/31262303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-019-0551-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Woo, Xing Yi Srivastava, Anuj Graber, Joel H. Yadav, Vinod Sarsani, Vishal Kumar Simons, Al Beane, Glen Grubb, Stephen Ananda, Guruprasad Liu, Rangjiao Stafford, Grace Chuang, Jeffrey H. Airhart, Susan D. Karuturi, R. Krishna Murthy George, Joshy Bult, Carol J. Genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs): challenges and guidelines |
title | Genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs): challenges and guidelines |
title_full | Genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs): challenges and guidelines |
title_fullStr | Genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs): challenges and guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs): challenges and guidelines |
title_short | Genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs): challenges and guidelines |
title_sort | genomic data analysis workflows for tumors from patient-derived xenografts (pdxs): challenges and guidelines |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31262303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-019-0551-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wooxingyi genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT srivastavaanuj genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT graberjoelh genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT yadavvinod genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT sarsanivishalkumar genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT simonsal genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT beaneglen genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT grubbstephen genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT anandaguruprasad genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT liurangjiao genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT staffordgrace genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT chuangjeffreyh genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT airhartsusand genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT karuturirkrishnamurthy genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT georgejoshy genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines AT bultcarolj genomicdataanalysisworkflowsfortumorsfrompatientderivedxenograftspdxschallengesandguidelines |