Cargando…

Insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend using basal insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus if glycaemic target cannot be attained on non-insulin anti-diabetic drugs. Available choices of basal insulin include intermediate-acting neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and long-act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lau, E., Salem, A., Chan, J. C. N., So, W. Y., Kong, A., Lamotte, M., Luk, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-019-0180-9
_version_ 1783431683771465728
author Lau, E.
Salem, A.
Chan, J. C. N.
So, W. Y.
Kong, A.
Lamotte, M.
Luk, A.
author_facet Lau, E.
Salem, A.
Chan, J. C. N.
So, W. Y.
Kong, A.
Lamotte, M.
Luk, A.
author_sort Lau, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend using basal insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus if glycaemic target cannot be attained on non-insulin anti-diabetic drugs. Available choices of basal insulin include intermediate-acting neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and long-acting insulin analogues like insulin glargine U100. Despite clear advantages of glargine U100, the existing practice in Hong Kong still favours NPH insulin due to lower immediate drug costs. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine U100 compared to NPH insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with non-insulin anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong. METHODS: The IQVIA™ Core Diabetes Model (CDM) v9.0 was used to conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis of glargine U100 versus NPH. Baseline characteristics were collected from the Hong Kong Diabetes Registry. Efficacy rates were extracted from a published study comparing glargine U100 and NPH in Asia, utilities from published literature, and costs constructed using the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HA) Gazette (public healthcare setting). The primary outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: Insulin glargine U100 resulted in an ICER of HKD 98,663 per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained. The incremental gains in QALY and costs were 0.217 years and HKD 21,360 respectively. Results from scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were consistent with that from base case analysis. CONCLUSION: Insulin glargine U100 is a cost-effective treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes compared to NPH insulin in setting in Hong Kong. This was mainly driven by the significantly lower rates of hypoglycaemia of insulin glargine U100 than NPH insulin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-019-0180-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6604305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66043052019-07-12 Insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis Lau, E. Salem, A. Chan, J. C. N. So, W. Y. Kong, A. Lamotte, M. Luk, A. Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend using basal insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus if glycaemic target cannot be attained on non-insulin anti-diabetic drugs. Available choices of basal insulin include intermediate-acting neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and long-acting insulin analogues like insulin glargine U100. Despite clear advantages of glargine U100, the existing practice in Hong Kong still favours NPH insulin due to lower immediate drug costs. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine U100 compared to NPH insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with non-insulin anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong. METHODS: The IQVIA™ Core Diabetes Model (CDM) v9.0 was used to conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis of glargine U100 versus NPH. Baseline characteristics were collected from the Hong Kong Diabetes Registry. Efficacy rates were extracted from a published study comparing glargine U100 and NPH in Asia, utilities from published literature, and costs constructed using the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HA) Gazette (public healthcare setting). The primary outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: Insulin glargine U100 resulted in an ICER of HKD 98,663 per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained. The incremental gains in QALY and costs were 0.217 years and HKD 21,360 respectively. Results from scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were consistent with that from base case analysis. CONCLUSION: Insulin glargine U100 is a cost-effective treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes compared to NPH insulin in setting in Hong Kong. This was mainly driven by the significantly lower rates of hypoglycaemia of insulin glargine U100 than NPH insulin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-019-0180-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6604305/ /pubmed/31303866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-019-0180-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lau, E.
Salem, A.
Chan, J. C. N.
So, W. Y.
Kong, A.
Lamotte, M.
Luk, A.
Insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title Insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort insulin glargine compared to neutral protamine hagedorn (nph) insulin in patients with type-2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral anti-diabetic agents alone in hong kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-019-0180-9
work_keys_str_mv AT laue insulinglarginecomparedtoneutralprotaminehagedornnphinsulininpatientswithtype2diabetesuncontrolledwithoralantidiabeticagentsaloneinhongkongacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT salema insulinglarginecomparedtoneutralprotaminehagedornnphinsulininpatientswithtype2diabetesuncontrolledwithoralantidiabeticagentsaloneinhongkongacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT chanjcn insulinglarginecomparedtoneutralprotaminehagedornnphinsulininpatientswithtype2diabetesuncontrolledwithoralantidiabeticagentsaloneinhongkongacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT sowy insulinglarginecomparedtoneutralprotaminehagedornnphinsulininpatientswithtype2diabetesuncontrolledwithoralantidiabeticagentsaloneinhongkongacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT konga insulinglarginecomparedtoneutralprotaminehagedornnphinsulininpatientswithtype2diabetesuncontrolledwithoralantidiabeticagentsaloneinhongkongacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT lamottem insulinglarginecomparedtoneutralprotaminehagedornnphinsulininpatientswithtype2diabetesuncontrolledwithoralantidiabeticagentsaloneinhongkongacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT luka insulinglarginecomparedtoneutralprotaminehagedornnphinsulininpatientswithtype2diabetesuncontrolledwithoralantidiabeticagentsaloneinhongkongacosteffectivenessanalysis