Cargando…

Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and wound infiltration (WI) are common locoregional anesthesia techniques for pain management in patients undergoing colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Comparative data between these two practices are conflicting, and a clear benefit of TAP block ove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedrazzani, Corrado, Park, Soo Yeun, Scotton, Giovanni, Park, Jun Seok, Kim, Hye Jin, Polati, Enrico, Guglielmi, Alfredo, Choi, Gyu Seog
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31266529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3509-y
_version_ 1783431723305926656
author Pedrazzani, Corrado
Park, Soo Yeun
Scotton, Giovanni
Park, Jun Seok
Kim, Hye Jin
Polati, Enrico
Guglielmi, Alfredo
Choi, Gyu Seog
author_facet Pedrazzani, Corrado
Park, Soo Yeun
Scotton, Giovanni
Park, Jun Seok
Kim, Hye Jin
Polati, Enrico
Guglielmi, Alfredo
Choi, Gyu Seog
author_sort Pedrazzani, Corrado
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and wound infiltration (WI) are common locoregional anesthesia techniques for pain management in patients undergoing colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Comparative data between these two practices are conflicting, and a clear benefit of TAP block over WI is still debated. The main purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy in pain control of WI compared with WI plus laparoscopic TAP block (L-TAP) in cases of laparoscopic colorectal resection. Secondary aims are to evaluate other short-term results directly related to pain management: the need for rescue analgesic drugs, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, the resumption of gut functions, and the length of hospital stay. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, two-arm, multicenter, single-blind study evaluating the efficacy of postoperative analgesic management of WI versus WI plus L-TAP in the context of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Randomization is at the patient level, and participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either WI alone or WI plus L-TAP. Those eligible for inclusion were patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colorectal tumor or diverticular disease at the Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Verona University, Verona, Italy, and at the Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. Fifty-four patients are needed in each group to evidence a difference greater than 1 of 10 according to the numeric rating scale for pain assessment to establish that this difference would matter in practice. DISCUSSION: The demonstration of a noninferiority of WI compared with WI plus L-TAP block would call into question TAP block usefulness in the setting of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03376048. Prospectively registered on 15 December 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3509-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6604482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66044822019-07-12 Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial Pedrazzani, Corrado Park, Soo Yeun Scotton, Giovanni Park, Jun Seok Kim, Hye Jin Polati, Enrico Guglielmi, Alfredo Choi, Gyu Seog Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and wound infiltration (WI) are common locoregional anesthesia techniques for pain management in patients undergoing colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Comparative data between these two practices are conflicting, and a clear benefit of TAP block over WI is still debated. The main purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy in pain control of WI compared with WI plus laparoscopic TAP block (L-TAP) in cases of laparoscopic colorectal resection. Secondary aims are to evaluate other short-term results directly related to pain management: the need for rescue analgesic drugs, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, the resumption of gut functions, and the length of hospital stay. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, two-arm, multicenter, single-blind study evaluating the efficacy of postoperative analgesic management of WI versus WI plus L-TAP in the context of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Randomization is at the patient level, and participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either WI alone or WI plus L-TAP. Those eligible for inclusion were patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colorectal tumor or diverticular disease at the Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Verona University, Verona, Italy, and at the Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. Fifty-four patients are needed in each group to evidence a difference greater than 1 of 10 according to the numeric rating scale for pain assessment to establish that this difference would matter in practice. DISCUSSION: The demonstration of a noninferiority of WI compared with WI plus L-TAP block would call into question TAP block usefulness in the setting of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03376048. Prospectively registered on 15 December 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3509-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6604482/ /pubmed/31266529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3509-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Pedrazzani, Corrado
Park, Soo Yeun
Scotton, Giovanni
Park, Jun Seok
Kim, Hye Jin
Polati, Enrico
Guglielmi, Alfredo
Choi, Gyu Seog
Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial
title Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial
title_full Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial
title_fullStr Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial
title_short Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial
title_sort analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31266529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3509-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrazzanicorrado analgesicefficacyofpreemptivelocalwoundinfiltrationpluslaparoscopicassistedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuswoundinfiltrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionstudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentersingleblindnoninferioritytrial
AT parksooyeun analgesicefficacyofpreemptivelocalwoundinfiltrationpluslaparoscopicassistedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuswoundinfiltrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionstudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentersingleblindnoninferioritytrial
AT scottongiovanni analgesicefficacyofpreemptivelocalwoundinfiltrationpluslaparoscopicassistedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuswoundinfiltrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionstudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentersingleblindnoninferioritytrial
AT parkjunseok analgesicefficacyofpreemptivelocalwoundinfiltrationpluslaparoscopicassistedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuswoundinfiltrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionstudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentersingleblindnoninferioritytrial
AT kimhyejin analgesicefficacyofpreemptivelocalwoundinfiltrationpluslaparoscopicassistedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuswoundinfiltrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionstudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentersingleblindnoninferioritytrial
AT polatienrico analgesicefficacyofpreemptivelocalwoundinfiltrationpluslaparoscopicassistedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuswoundinfiltrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionstudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentersingleblindnoninferioritytrial
AT guglielmialfredo analgesicefficacyofpreemptivelocalwoundinfiltrationpluslaparoscopicassistedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuswoundinfiltrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionstudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentersingleblindnoninferioritytrial
AT choigyuseog analgesicefficacyofpreemptivelocalwoundinfiltrationpluslaparoscopicassistedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuswoundinfiltrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionstudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentersingleblindnoninferioritytrial