Cargando…

Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise

Rod photoreceptors of the vertebrate retina produce, in darkness, spontaneous discrete current waves virtually identical to responses to single photons. The waves comprise an irreducible source of noise (discrete dark noise) that may limit the threshold sensitivity of vision. The waves obviously ori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Govardovskii, Victor I., Astakhova, Luba A., Rotov, Alexander Yu., Firsov, Michael L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Rockefeller University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6605685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30992369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812317
_version_ 1783431813461442560
author Govardovskii, Victor I.
Astakhova, Luba A.
Rotov, Alexander Yu.
Firsov, Michael L.
author_facet Govardovskii, Victor I.
Astakhova, Luba A.
Rotov, Alexander Yu.
Firsov, Michael L.
author_sort Govardovskii, Victor I.
collection PubMed
description Rod photoreceptors of the vertebrate retina produce, in darkness, spontaneous discrete current waves virtually identical to responses to single photons. The waves comprise an irreducible source of noise (discrete dark noise) that may limit the threshold sensitivity of vision. The waves obviously originate from acts of random activation of single rhodopsin molecules. Until recently, it was generally accepted that the activation occurs due to the rhodopsin thermal motion. Yet, a few years ago it was proposed that rhodopsin molecules are activated not by heat but rather by real photons generated within the retina by chemiluminescence. Using a high-sensitive photomultiplier, we measured intensities of biophoton emission from isolated retinas and eyecups of frogs (Rana ridibunda) and fish (sterlet, Acipenser ruthenus). Retinal samples were placed in a perfusion chamber and emitted photons collected by a high-aperture quartz lens. The collected light was sent to the photomultiplier cathode through a rotating chopper so that a long-lasting synchronous accumulation of the light signal was possible. The absolute intensity of bio-emission was estimated by the response of the measuring system to a calibrated light source. The intensity of the source, in turn, was quantified by measuring rhodopsin bleaching with single-rod microspectrophotometry. We also measured the frequency of discrete dark waves in rods of the two species with suction pipette recordings. Expressed as the rate constant of rhodopsin activation, it was 1.2 × 10(−11)/s in frogs and 7.6 × 10(−11)/s in sterlets. Approximately two thirds of retinal samples of each species produced reliably measurable biophoton emissions. However, its intensity was ≥100 times lower than necessary to produce the discrete dark noise. We argue that this is just a lower estimate of the discrepancy between the hypothesis and experiment. We conclude that the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of discrete dark noise in photoreceptors must be rejected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6605685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66056852020-01-01 Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise Govardovskii, Victor I. Astakhova, Luba A. Rotov, Alexander Yu. Firsov, Michael L. J Gen Physiol Research Articles Rod photoreceptors of the vertebrate retina produce, in darkness, spontaneous discrete current waves virtually identical to responses to single photons. The waves comprise an irreducible source of noise (discrete dark noise) that may limit the threshold sensitivity of vision. The waves obviously originate from acts of random activation of single rhodopsin molecules. Until recently, it was generally accepted that the activation occurs due to the rhodopsin thermal motion. Yet, a few years ago it was proposed that rhodopsin molecules are activated not by heat but rather by real photons generated within the retina by chemiluminescence. Using a high-sensitive photomultiplier, we measured intensities of biophoton emission from isolated retinas and eyecups of frogs (Rana ridibunda) and fish (sterlet, Acipenser ruthenus). Retinal samples were placed in a perfusion chamber and emitted photons collected by a high-aperture quartz lens. The collected light was sent to the photomultiplier cathode through a rotating chopper so that a long-lasting synchronous accumulation of the light signal was possible. The absolute intensity of bio-emission was estimated by the response of the measuring system to a calibrated light source. The intensity of the source, in turn, was quantified by measuring rhodopsin bleaching with single-rod microspectrophotometry. We also measured the frequency of discrete dark waves in rods of the two species with suction pipette recordings. Expressed as the rate constant of rhodopsin activation, it was 1.2 × 10(−11)/s in frogs and 7.6 × 10(−11)/s in sterlets. Approximately two thirds of retinal samples of each species produced reliably measurable biophoton emissions. However, its intensity was ≥100 times lower than necessary to produce the discrete dark noise. We argue that this is just a lower estimate of the discrepancy between the hypothesis and experiment. We conclude that the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of discrete dark noise in photoreceptors must be rejected. Rockefeller University Press 2019-07-01 2019-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6605685/ /pubmed/30992369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812317 Text en © 2019 Govardovskii et al. http://www.rupress.org/termshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms (http://www.rupress.org/terms/) ). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Govardovskii, Victor I.
Astakhova, Luba A.
Rotov, Alexander Yu.
Firsov, Michael L.
Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise
title Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise
title_full Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise
title_fullStr Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise
title_full_unstemmed Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise
title_short Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise
title_sort rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6605685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30992369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812317
work_keys_str_mv AT govardovskiivictori rejectionofthebiophotonhypothesisontheoriginofphotoreceptordarknoise
AT astakhovalubaa rejectionofthebiophotonhypothesisontheoriginofphotoreceptordarknoise
AT rotovalexanderyu rejectionofthebiophotonhypothesisontheoriginofphotoreceptordarknoise
AT firsovmichaell rejectionofthebiophotonhypothesisontheoriginofphotoreceptordarknoise