Cargando…

The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review

Pregnant women are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza and are recognized as a priority group for influenza vaccination. Despite this, uptake is often poor and one reason cited for this is concerns about safety. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, Michelle L., Krishnaswamy, Sushena, Macartney, Kristine, Cheng, Allen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6605784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30380986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1540807
_version_ 1783431828420427776
author Giles, Michelle L.
Krishnaswamy, Sushena
Macartney, Kristine
Cheng, Allen
author_facet Giles, Michelle L.
Krishnaswamy, Sushena
Macartney, Kristine
Cheng, Allen
author_sort Giles, Michelle L.
collection PubMed
description Pregnant women are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza and are recognized as a priority group for influenza vaccination. Despite this, uptake is often poor and one reason cited for this is concerns about safety. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the safety of inactivated influenza vaccination (IIV) in pregnancy. Studies were included if they were: (i) observational or experimental design; (ii) included a comparator group comprising of unvaccinated pregnant women; (iii) comprised of either seasonal IIV or monovalent H1N1 IIV (including adjuvanted vaccines); and (iv) addressed one of the following outcomes: preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), fetal death (including stillbirth or spontaneous abortion), low birth weight (LBW) or congenital abnormalities. Two reviewers screened abstracts and titles and selected full texts for retrieval. Crude odds ratios were calculated from reported event rates, using binomial standard errors. Adjusted odds ratios, hazard ratios and relative rates were extracted as reported in each paper. After removal of duplicates and full text eligibility assessment, 40 studies remained. The aOR for PTB was 0.87 (0.78–0.96), for LBW 0.82 (0.76–0.89), congenital abnormality 1.03 (0.99–1.07), SGA 0.99 (0.94–1.04) and stillbirth 0.84 (0.65–1.08). This study contributes to the increasing body of safety data for IIV in pregnancy and reports a protective effect on PTB and LBW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6605784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66057842019-07-09 The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review Giles, Michelle L. Krishnaswamy, Sushena Macartney, Kristine Cheng, Allen Hum Vaccin Immunother Research Paper Pregnant women are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza and are recognized as a priority group for influenza vaccination. Despite this, uptake is often poor and one reason cited for this is concerns about safety. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the safety of inactivated influenza vaccination (IIV) in pregnancy. Studies were included if they were: (i) observational or experimental design; (ii) included a comparator group comprising of unvaccinated pregnant women; (iii) comprised of either seasonal IIV or monovalent H1N1 IIV (including adjuvanted vaccines); and (iv) addressed one of the following outcomes: preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), fetal death (including stillbirth or spontaneous abortion), low birth weight (LBW) or congenital abnormalities. Two reviewers screened abstracts and titles and selected full texts for retrieval. Crude odds ratios were calculated from reported event rates, using binomial standard errors. Adjusted odds ratios, hazard ratios and relative rates were extracted as reported in each paper. After removal of duplicates and full text eligibility assessment, 40 studies remained. The aOR for PTB was 0.87 (0.78–0.96), for LBW 0.82 (0.76–0.89), congenital abnormality 1.03 (0.99–1.07), SGA 0.99 (0.94–1.04) and stillbirth 0.84 (0.65–1.08). This study contributes to the increasing body of safety data for IIV in pregnancy and reports a protective effect on PTB and LBW. Taylor & Francis 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6605784/ /pubmed/30380986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1540807 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Giles, Michelle L.
Krishnaswamy, Sushena
Macartney, Kristine
Cheng, Allen
The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review
title The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review
title_full The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review
title_fullStr The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review
title_short The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review
title_sort safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6605784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30380986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1540807
work_keys_str_mv AT gilesmichellel thesafetyofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesinpregnancyforbirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT krishnaswamysushena thesafetyofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesinpregnancyforbirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT macartneykristine thesafetyofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesinpregnancyforbirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT chengallen thesafetyofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesinpregnancyforbirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT gilesmichellel safetyofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesinpregnancyforbirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT krishnaswamysushena safetyofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesinpregnancyforbirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT macartneykristine safetyofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesinpregnancyforbirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT chengallen safetyofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesinpregnancyforbirthoutcomesasystematicreview