Cargando…
A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community
PURPOSE: Genome editing holds both tremendous therapeutic promise and significant potential risk. Sickle cell disease (SCD), the most commonly inherited blood disorder, is a frontline candidate for the clinical applications of this tool. However, there is limited knowledge of patient community value...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0409-6 |
_version_ | 1783431910273318912 |
---|---|
author | Persaud, Anitra Desine, Stacy Blizinsky, Katherine Bonham, Vence L. |
author_facet | Persaud, Anitra Desine, Stacy Blizinsky, Katherine Bonham, Vence L. |
author_sort | Persaud, Anitra |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Genome editing holds both tremendous therapeutic promise and significant potential risk. Sickle cell disease (SCD), the most commonly inherited blood disorder, is a frontline candidate for the clinical applications of this tool. However, there is limited knowledge of patient community values and concerns regarding this new technology. This study aims to investigate the perspectives of three key decision-makers (patients, parents, and physicians) toward participation in future CRISPR-mediated somatic genome editing clinical trials. METHODS: We utilized a mixed-methods approach, involving an educational video tool, two-part survey, and 15 moderated, audio-recorded focus groups, which were conducted in seven U.S. cities. RESULTS: Study participants expressed hope that genome editing technology would rechart the course for SCD, but concerns related to involvement burden, uncertainty of clinical outcomes, and equity in access were identified. Major themes emerged from the focus groups: facilitators of, and barriers to, participation in future somatic genome editing clinical trials; information pertinent to the decision-making process; persons from whom participants would seek counsel before making a decision; and recommendations for the research community on meaningful engagement as clinical trials are designed and approved. CONCLUSION: The advent of genome editing has renewed hope for the SCD community, but caution tempers this optimism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6606394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66063942019-08-07 A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community Persaud, Anitra Desine, Stacy Blizinsky, Katherine Bonham, Vence L. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Genome editing holds both tremendous therapeutic promise and significant potential risk. Sickle cell disease (SCD), the most commonly inherited blood disorder, is a frontline candidate for the clinical applications of this tool. However, there is limited knowledge of patient community values and concerns regarding this new technology. This study aims to investigate the perspectives of three key decision-makers (patients, parents, and physicians) toward participation in future CRISPR-mediated somatic genome editing clinical trials. METHODS: We utilized a mixed-methods approach, involving an educational video tool, two-part survey, and 15 moderated, audio-recorded focus groups, which were conducted in seven U.S. cities. RESULTS: Study participants expressed hope that genome editing technology would rechart the course for SCD, but concerns related to involvement burden, uncertainty of clinical outcomes, and equity in access were identified. Major themes emerged from the focus groups: facilitators of, and barriers to, participation in future somatic genome editing clinical trials; information pertinent to the decision-making process; persons from whom participants would seek counsel before making a decision; and recommendations for the research community on meaningful engagement as clinical trials are designed and approved. CONCLUSION: The advent of genome editing has renewed hope for the SCD community, but caution tempers this optimism. Nature Publishing Group US 2018-12-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6606394/ /pubmed/30581191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0409-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, and provide a link to the Creative Commons license. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Persaud, Anitra Desine, Stacy Blizinsky, Katherine Bonham, Vence L. A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community |
title | A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community |
title_full | A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community |
title_fullStr | A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community |
title_full_unstemmed | A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community |
title_short | A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community |
title_sort | crispr focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0409-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT persaudanitra acrisprfocusonattitudesandbeliefstowardsomaticgenomeeditingfromstakeholderswithinthesicklecelldiseasecommunity AT desinestacy acrisprfocusonattitudesandbeliefstowardsomaticgenomeeditingfromstakeholderswithinthesicklecelldiseasecommunity AT blizinskykatherine acrisprfocusonattitudesandbeliefstowardsomaticgenomeeditingfromstakeholderswithinthesicklecelldiseasecommunity AT bonhamvencel acrisprfocusonattitudesandbeliefstowardsomaticgenomeeditingfromstakeholderswithinthesicklecelldiseasecommunity AT persaudanitra crisprfocusonattitudesandbeliefstowardsomaticgenomeeditingfromstakeholderswithinthesicklecelldiseasecommunity AT desinestacy crisprfocusonattitudesandbeliefstowardsomaticgenomeeditingfromstakeholderswithinthesicklecelldiseasecommunity AT blizinskykatherine crisprfocusonattitudesandbeliefstowardsomaticgenomeeditingfromstakeholderswithinthesicklecelldiseasecommunity AT bonhamvencel crisprfocusonattitudesandbeliefstowardsomaticgenomeeditingfromstakeholderswithinthesicklecelldiseasecommunity |