Cargando…

The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing

BACKGROUND: Paediatric critical care practitioners often make use of pressure support (PS) to overcome the perceived imposed work of breathing (WOBimp) during an extubation readiness test (ERT). However, no paediatric data are available that shows the necessity of adding of pressure support during s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dijk, Jefta, Blokpoel, Robert G. T., Koopman, Alette A., Dijkstra, Sandra, Burgerhof, Johannes G. M., Kneyber, Martin C. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31267228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0549-0
_version_ 1783431943633764352
author van Dijk, Jefta
Blokpoel, Robert G. T.
Koopman, Alette A.
Dijkstra, Sandra
Burgerhof, Johannes G. M.
Kneyber, Martin C. J.
author_facet van Dijk, Jefta
Blokpoel, Robert G. T.
Koopman, Alette A.
Dijkstra, Sandra
Burgerhof, Johannes G. M.
Kneyber, Martin C. J.
author_sort van Dijk, Jefta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Paediatric critical care practitioners often make use of pressure support (PS) to overcome the perceived imposed work of breathing (WOBimp) during an extubation readiness test (ERT). However, no paediatric data are available that shows the necessity of adding of pressure support during such tests. We sought to measure the WOBimp during an ERT with and without added pressure support and to study its clinical correlate. This was a prospective study in spontaneously breathing ventilated children < 18 years undergoing ERT. Using tracheal manometry, WOBimp was calculated by integrating the difference between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tracheal pressure (Ptrach) over the measured expiratory tidal volume (VTe) under two paired conditions: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with and without PS. Patients with post-extubation upper airway obstruction were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were studied. Median PS during the ERT was 10 cmH(2)O. WOBimp was significantly higher without PS (median 0.27, IQR 0.20–0.50 J/L) than with added PS (median 0.00, IQR 0.00–0.11 J/L). Although there were statistically significant changes in spontaneous breath rate [32 (23–42) vs. 37 (27–46) breaths/min, p < 0.001] and higher ET-CO(2) [5.90 (5.38–6.65) vs. 6.23 (5.55–6.94) kPa, p < 0.001] and expiratory Vt decreased [7.72 (6.66–8.97) vs. 7.08 (5.82–8.08) mL/kg, p < 0.001] in the absence of PS, these changes appeared clinically irrelevant since the Comfort B score remained unaffected [12 (10–13) vs. 12 (10–13), P = 0.987]. Multivariable analysis showed that changes in WOBimp occurred independent of endotracheal tube size. CONCLUSIONS: Withholding PS during ERT does not lead to clinically relevant increases in WOBimp, irrespective of endotracheal tube size. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0549-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6606677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66066772019-07-18 The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing van Dijk, Jefta Blokpoel, Robert G. T. Koopman, Alette A. Dijkstra, Sandra Burgerhof, Johannes G. M. Kneyber, Martin C. J. Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Paediatric critical care practitioners often make use of pressure support (PS) to overcome the perceived imposed work of breathing (WOBimp) during an extubation readiness test (ERT). However, no paediatric data are available that shows the necessity of adding of pressure support during such tests. We sought to measure the WOBimp during an ERT with and without added pressure support and to study its clinical correlate. This was a prospective study in spontaneously breathing ventilated children < 18 years undergoing ERT. Using tracheal manometry, WOBimp was calculated by integrating the difference between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tracheal pressure (Ptrach) over the measured expiratory tidal volume (VTe) under two paired conditions: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with and without PS. Patients with post-extubation upper airway obstruction were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were studied. Median PS during the ERT was 10 cmH(2)O. WOBimp was significantly higher without PS (median 0.27, IQR 0.20–0.50 J/L) than with added PS (median 0.00, IQR 0.00–0.11 J/L). Although there were statistically significant changes in spontaneous breath rate [32 (23–42) vs. 37 (27–46) breaths/min, p < 0.001] and higher ET-CO(2) [5.90 (5.38–6.65) vs. 6.23 (5.55–6.94) kPa, p < 0.001] and expiratory Vt decreased [7.72 (6.66–8.97) vs. 7.08 (5.82–8.08) mL/kg, p < 0.001] in the absence of PS, these changes appeared clinically irrelevant since the Comfort B score remained unaffected [12 (10–13) vs. 12 (10–13), P = 0.987]. Multivariable analysis showed that changes in WOBimp occurred independent of endotracheal tube size. CONCLUSIONS: Withholding PS during ERT does not lead to clinically relevant increases in WOBimp, irrespective of endotracheal tube size. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0549-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6606677/ /pubmed/31267228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0549-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
van Dijk, Jefta
Blokpoel, Robert G. T.
Koopman, Alette A.
Dijkstra, Sandra
Burgerhof, Johannes G. M.
Kneyber, Martin C. J.
The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
title The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
title_full The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
title_fullStr The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
title_full_unstemmed The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
title_short The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
title_sort effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31267228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0549-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vandijkjefta theeffectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT blokpoelrobertgt theeffectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT koopmanalettea theeffectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT dijkstrasandra theeffectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT burgerhofjohannesgm theeffectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT kneybermartincj theeffectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT vandijkjefta effectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT blokpoelrobertgt effectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT koopmanalettea effectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT dijkstrasandra effectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT burgerhofjohannesgm effectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting
AT kneybermartincj effectofpressuresupportonimposedworkofbreathingduringpaediatricextubationreadinesstesting